Couldn't Leave This One Unanswered
(From previous thread that was rightfully closed due to Jl's consistent nastiness.)
Quote:
from Athos
Your continued bringing up "the Aquinas incident" which is about two years old is a case in point. Besides the fact of it's being ancient history by now, it was clearly explained to you, but in your troll-like fervor to disagree with anything, you can't let go of it.
Whenever you bring it up, it's a clear sign you have nothing intelligent to say.
Quote:
from Jilsnbe
It's an example of you giving a partial quote to supposedly support a contention of yours. When the entire quote was provided, it plainly contradicted your belief. It was, shall we say, suspicious in the extreme.
Not a bit suspicious when it was explained at length, even going so far as to note two famous examples of the medieval Church silencing Erasmus and Galileo when they proposed controversial subjects. I note you have never included that in your "incident".
To repeat, it never comes up unless you have nothing intelligent to say.
Quote:
My "brand of Christianity" is to depend on what Jesus said. You plainly don't agree
No, your brand of Christianity is to depend on what others say Jesus said.