Ask Me Help Desk

Ask Me Help Desk (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forum.php)
-   Current Events (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forumdisplay.php?f=486)
-   -   Passing of a Legend (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/showthread.php?t=849739)

  • Sep 8, 2022, 10:39 AM
    Curlyben
    Passing of a Legend
    Queen Elizabeth II has died, Buckingham Palace announces

    Queen Elizabeth II, the UK's longest-serving monarch, has died at Balmoral aged 96, after reigning for 70 years.

    Her family gathered at her Scottish estate after concerns grew about her health earlier on Thursday.

    The Queen came to the throne in 1952 and witnessed enormous social change.

    With her death, her eldest son Charles, the former Prince of Wales, will lead the country in mourning as the new King and head of state for 14 Commonwealth realms.

    In a statement, Buckingham Palace said: "The Queen died peacefully at Balmoral this afternoon.

    "The King and the Queen Consort will remain at Balmoral this evening and will return to London tomorrow."


    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-61585886

    Whether you are a Royalist, federalist, or many others, you must give her her dues for the life of unswerving service to the monarchy and her country.
    She was the longest serving female monarch in the world.
    Welcomed 15 Prime Ministers for the UK Government as well as numerous other Heads of State.

    We are unlikely to ever see her like again.
    May she rest in peace and rejoin her Prince.
  • Sep 8, 2022, 11:13 AM
    tomder55
    Quote:

    Whether you are a Royalist, federalist, or many others, you must give her her dues for the life of unswerving service to the monarchy and her country.
    Indeed !

    IMO the greatest monarch Great Britian has had .

    Long live the Queen . Requiescat in Pace. Hers was a life of duty . She lived up to her pledge of April 21, 1947.

    I declare before you all that my whole life, whether it be long or short, shall be devoted to your service and the service of our great imperial family to which we all belong.

    It is no secret that I am not a fan of monarchy . But forced to live under a monarchy ,she would be my model of a benevolent ruler .
  • Sep 8, 2022, 11:29 AM
    tomder55
    Heck of a way for Liz Truss to enter leadership of the nation ;who now will replace 'Cincinnatus " Johnson

    I have to say ,I can't imagine Gnarly Charlie as King .
  • Sep 8, 2022, 11:39 AM
    Curlyben
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    I have to say ,I can't imagine Gnarly Charlie as King .

    Officially, He will be known as King Charles the Third, I'm sure this will soon become Charles the Turd...
  • Sep 8, 2022, 11:48 AM
    tomder55
    lol I suppose he is a better alternative to Randy Andy . Have they considered skipping a generation ?
  • Sep 8, 2022, 11:53 AM
    Curlyben
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    Have they considered skipping a generation ?

    Now that would be great, as William certainly seems far more grounded.
    You never know, after all Charles is over 70 already, so either way we wont be around for too long.
  • Sep 9, 2022, 02:00 AM
    tomder55
    Lord Conrad Black wrote this a decade ago on her Diamond Jubilee.


    There is room for debate about ideal forms of government, but it would be impossible to elect a more selfless, faultless, tireless holder of such a difficult office. God has saved the Queen these 60 years, and hundreds of millions of people have been well served.

    The Queen's Diamond Jubilee: Conrad Black on the marvellous reign | National Post
  • Sep 9, 2022, 05:55 AM
    tomder55
    Peggy Noonan's trbute in WSJ . I will c/p the entire op ed because it is a subscription site,

    ‘For the British people, Victoria was more than an individual, more even than the queen,” Robert K. Massie wrote in “Dreadnought: Britain, Germany, and the Coming of the Great War.” “She was—and had been as long as most of them could remember—a part of the fabric of their lives. She embodied history, tradition, government, and the structure and morality of their society. They trusted her to remain there, always to do her duty, always to give order to their lives. She did not disappoint them. In return, they gave her their allegiance, their devotion—and their esteem.”
    We all knew it was coming yet it feels like a blow. A mighty presence has passed, one who meant more to us perhaps than we’d noticed.
    The reign of Queen Elizabeth II surpassed Victoria’s (1837-1901) in September 2015. For the vast majority of her people, she was the only monarch they had ever known. Her life spanned almost a century, through wars, through empire and its decline, through every cultural and political shift. And in all that time she was a symbol of continuity, stability and soundness.
    There will be, mostly but not only in Britain, a surge of sentiment as if a big page has been turned and we very much don’t want it to turn—we don’t want to get to the end of that book, don’t want to close it.

    Her virtues were old-school virtues.

    She accepted her life with grace. When she became queen at 25 she recognized it as her duty and destiny. She was a member of a particular family and the heir to a particular throne. She had a duty to the people of her country and would sacrifice a great deal—privacy, leisure, some faint sense of control of one’s life—to meet it. She represented the permanent over the merely prevalent.


    Sally Bedell Smith, in her great biography “Elizabeth the Queen: the Life of a Modern Monarch,” quoted the British journalist Rebecca West, who observed that the monarch is “the emblem of the state, the symbol of our national life, the guardian of our self-respect.” But it was more than that, too; you didn’t have to be English to appreciate what she was doing.

    She did what she said she’d do. After her father’s death, she met with the leaders of Britain at St. James’s Palace. In a clear voice she declared: “By the sudden death of my dear father, I am called to assume the duties and responsibilities of sovereignty. . . . I shall always work, as my father did throughout his reign, to advance the happiness and prosperity of my peoples. . . . I pray that God will help me to discharge worthily this heavy task that has been lain upon me so early in my life.” She did, and everyone watching over the years could see it.

    She gave it everything she had. She was conscientious, serious-minded, responsible. Every day but Christmas and Easter Sunday and wherever she was, she directed her energies to the red leather dispatch boxes of official government papers, Foreign Office cables, budget documents, intelligence reports. She was deskbound as long as needed, often working into the evening. After that the private audiences, public events, consultations. She didn’t flag.

    It wasn’t about her. The important thing was the institution, the monarchy, and its responsibility to its subjects. She wanted to be a queen the country adhered to and was proud of, so she maintained dignity. She knew her role. She didn’t show moods or take sides, never tried to win the crowd, didn’t attempt to establish a reputation for wit or good nature. She was in her public dealings placid, as a great nation’s queen would be. “She has been, as someone once said, the light above politics,” Ms. Smith said Thursday on CNN. “Even when I’d watch her at royal events she would hesitate to clap or smile because she didn’t want to show favoritism. She has wanted to be a force for everybody and a glue for the nation, and that sort of exterior has been important.”

    She was a woman of faith. At her 1953 coronation in Westminster Abbey, the most important moment happened outside of television range. It was when the archbishop of Canterbury poured holy oil and anointed the new queen, “making a sign of the cross on the palms of each of her hands, her forehead, and exposed upper chest,” Ms. Smith wrote. (Victoria hadn’t allowed her archbishop to touch her chest.) Elizabeth felt the anointing “sanctified her before God to serve her people.” Her friends said it was the anointing, not the crowning, that made her queen.

    She understood her role. She was the longest reigning monarch in British history, a continuous thread to the past. Decades passed but the thread remained and never broke, which suggested things would hold together, and everything in the end would be all right. She understood that in the tumultuous 20th century the idea of continuity itself was a gift to her country. She had to be reliable, and was.

    Because of all this, when she entered the room, Britain entered the room. Majesty entered, something old and hallowed and rich in meaning, something going back to tribes that painted themselves blue and forward to the Magna Carta. It was mysterious, but I saw it once: She entered a hall full of voices and suddenly, silence. It was only a few years ago, but I realized that in a time when personal stature is mindlessly thrown off or meanly taken, hers had only increased.

    There is something so touching in the way she had begun in the past few years to laugh and smile so much, to show her joy, her simple pleasure in being there. You saw it in pictures taken this week, which showed her seeing off an old prime minister and seeing in a new one, wearing a plaid skirt and long gray cardigan, holding her cane and laughing merrily. I think of how moved I was by the clip a few months ago of the queen and Paddington Bear, in which she divulged what she kept in her purse—a marmalade sandwich. The royal band outside struck up Freddie Mercury, and she kept time with a spoon on her teacup. I didn’t know when I saw it why it moved me so much, and realized: because my mind was saying don’t go old friend, we’ll miss you.

    The great of Britain have been talking for years about how sad it will be when she departs. They’re about to be taken aback by how deep and pervasive the mourning is. Britain is braced for hard times; people won’t easily lose such a figure of stability and continuity. “King Charles” will sound strange on the tongue.
    And they loved her.

    Now I am imagining the royal funeral, the procession, the carriages of state going slowly down the mall, the deep crowds on each side. The old will come in their chairs and the crowd will kindly put them in front, the best view, to wave goodbye to their friend, with whom they had experienced such history together.

    Requiescat in pace, Elizabeth Regina.

    Queen Elizabeth’s Old-School Virtues - WSJ
  • Sep 9, 2022, 11:38 AM
    tomder55
    Charles the Turd pledged a 'lifelong service' as King. The dude is 73
  • Sep 10, 2022, 03:52 AM
    tomder55
    Clueless went to the Brit embassy in DC to pay his respects Thursday. He signed a condolence book . Camera's caught him using a typed out cheat sheet to write down his own personal message .

    When he finished he put the cue card back into his suit pocket . Then Jill Biden sat down and wrote her thoughts without the aid of some speech writer staffer's assistance .

    President Biden visits British Embassy Following the Death of Queen Elizabeth II - YouTube
  • Sep 20, 2022, 07:43 AM
    tomder55
    https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/...q=60&m=2&f=jpg
  • Sep 20, 2022, 09:53 AM
    Curlyben
    Early figures in indicate that the Queen's funeral drew the largest TV audience ever, at over 4.2 Billion people.....
  • Sep 20, 2022, 09:59 AM
    Wondergirl
    And that line of people waiting to pay their respects at her casket -- incredible! What a wonderful woman and ruler she was!
  • Sep 20, 2022, 12:33 PM
    tomder55
    I started watching at 5 AM Eastern Time and kept the TV on throughout the ceremony .
  • May 6, 2023, 04:23 AM
    tomder55
    Watching live stream of the coronation now with my morning coffee. Charles looks like he could use a jolt of java too.
  • May 6, 2023, 06:03 AM
    jlisenbe
    1 Attachment(s)
    He somehow looks a little less than enthusiastic.

    Attachment 49473
  • May 6, 2023, 06:09 AM
    tomder55
    What is it in the west where we have all these geezer leaders. becoming King at 74 ? He should abdicate now that he is crowned and let William become king.
  • May 6, 2023, 08:38 AM
    Curlyben
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by jlisenbe View Post
    He somehow looks a little less than enthusiastic.

    Attachment 49473

    It was his face when he was being presented with all the bling tat that made me smirk.
    I know it's history and tradition, but I was fully expecting the Glittering Armor of Arceus, or Gauntlets of Ogre Power...
  • May 6, 2023, 09:42 AM
    tomder55
    Did they give him Excaliber too ?
  • May 6, 2023, 10:02 AM
    Curlyben
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    Did they give him Excaliber too ?

    Na, Penny Mordaunt wouldn't give it up....
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65510506

  • All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:04 AM.