James O'Keefe's investigative journalists reveal huge 2016 election fraud, which was likely sanctioned by the White House and Hillary Clinton:
https://video.search.yahoo.com/video...hrtab-900&tt=b
|
James O'Keefe's investigative journalists reveal huge 2016 election fraud, which was likely sanctioned by the White House and Hillary Clinton:
https://video.search.yahoo.com/video...hrtab-900&tt=b
I tried to watch, but was immediately turned off by all the obscenities. If he can't make a case in plain, educated English....
Ummmm, we all know Alex Jones is a self-described conspiracy nut.Quote:
Originally Posted by TxGreaseMonkey
For those of you who are prejudiced against Alex Jones, I presented the original work by Veritas, which implicates Obama and Hillary in 2016 election fraud.
Alex Jones HIMSELF says he's a conspiracy nut!Quote:
Originally Posted by TxGreaseMonkey
You are like a broken record--look at the facts (video) yourself and see how voter fraud has taken place. It has already forced major resignations in the Democratic Party. If you won't view the video, you should move on.
There has been a LOT of voter fraud at least the last two presidential elections too... when you have a precinct with statistically impossible numbers ( ZERO Republican votes its blatant. Then there were the numerous precincts that had more votes than existed adults of legal voting age residing there much less registered to vote.
The left were bashing them as Conspiracy theorists, WIKILEAKS however has proven its happened and the DNC has a major hand in it. And of course... that they rigged the Primary to push out the wining candidate to put the Hildebeast in. I'd like to know what Bernie was promised by them to placate him after that.
There's even more illegal activity going on:
Rigging the Election – Video III: Creamer Confirms Hillary Clinton Involvement | Project Veritas Action
Wow, everything this guy does borders on despicable:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_O%27Keefe
How anyone can be in his camp as a source of anything is beyond me. There's not one of his projects not is not fraught with deceit. He's basically the right's smear artist.
As opposed to most of the Media who are working under direction of the DNC on behalf of Hillary protecting her and smearing Trump.. The main stream media has NO credibility left... nowhere in the world. PRAVDA used to be the running joke under the USSR, Wiki-leaks and other events have proven all the rest are just like them.
Voter fraud is well known. The cemetery vote in Memphis is well known.
Trump is his own worst enemy. No smearing is needed.Quote:
Originally Posted by smoothy
That's quite a wide-ranging conspiracy theory you got going there. So the DNC pays off the world media? Do you hear yourself?Quote:
Originally Posted by smoothy
The "world media" are overwhelmingly controlled by left wingers who no thinking person believes doesn't go out of their way to defend toe socialist/communist ideals they stand for, and demonize all others. Spend some time around the inner workings of government and time abroad to see how the media distorts events into something that never actually happened as reported. Then you will "get it". There is no legal or moral requirement for the media to be even remotely honest.Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedKarma
Thats a shame, because they are using "freedom of the press" to publish fantasy and fiction and pass it off as reality and fact when it isn't.
The Washington Post and New York times both , two of the most left leaning publications out there only mention Hillarys crimes as a footnote when they bother to comment on them at all, while dedicating entire pages to libel and slander Trump for allegations made with NO proof.
I saw a shooting in Baltimore back in the 80's. ( the victim survived)...took the ambulance 15 minutes to get there, it took the Police 45 minutes to get there, they stayed all of 10 minutes and left...I was there for another hour sitting where I was when it happened less than 20 feet away..the only non-involved witness to the event. Nobody ever asked me what happened...when I finally got up and left, get home then listened to what the media reported, not one single news program had it even remotely right...they all talked about a riot that ensued and how long it lasted, when in fact it was a fight that never involved more than 3 people and lasted only a few minutes before the shooting when 2 of them ran off. The only other witness was the guys wife/girlfriend and the guy who got shot was the one who started the fight in the first place.
And I could go on and on about other events not just here but in Europe in the years after that eye opening event.
The worst informed person is those who think they get the facts from the newspaper, radio or TV. They all tell you what they want you to know. Which is not what actually happened.
Do I see everything they report? Of course not, but when 95+% of what you do see is grossly misreported...its a rational thought to believe most of what you don't is being distorted as well.
Where do they get all the money? Why doesn't the right do anything about it?Quote:
Originally Posted by smoothy
I work for the government and I have travelled extensively.Quote:
Originally Posted by smoothy
Well we know that Trump LOVES to sue people, this should be a slam dunk, no? But yet Trump hasn't done that. What do you think that means?Quote:
Originally Posted by smoothy
smoothy, the media quotes Trump. Nothing more is needed. His quotes damn him. (And I'd had such great hopes that he, an outsider, would succeed at this....)
You don't have to "PAY" true leftist believers... Doe China pay everyone, did the Soviet Union? Did Cuba? We All know leftists everywhere will excuse ANYTHING Hillary does because she is one of them. And about what "Trump said".. Did you and other learn NOTHING about how the media selectively edits peoples words to change what they are saying. Naming just one.. how the 911 call George Zimmerman made was edited to completely chage the character of what was reported... but then... they left only survives by lies, deception and misrepresentation. They do that by editors in the media controlling what will be reported and how... and hiring only those politically sympathetic or getting rid of those who they find out aren't already. THis might be news to those who get everything they know from the media.. but its common knowledge to those who have seen what they do to "facts".Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedKarma
Wondergirl... did you not learn from what the media did editing the 911 call George Zimmerman made so they could paste the call as something totally different than what was actually made? That wasn't an isolated event...Quote:
Originally Posted by Wondergirl
Ummmm, I watch and listen to Trump in real time. No one is changing his words. Again, he is his own worst enemy.Quote:
Wondergirl... did you not learn from what the media did editing the 911 call George Zimmerman made so they could paste the call as something totally different than what was actually made? That wasn't an isolated event...
So you've met him in Person? A highly biased media does creative editing all the time... and when they aren't doing that they are constantly trying to tell you what they want you to believe the other person was thinking. Sorry, I've seen the media stretch the truth and flat out lie so often in the last 35 years I can't trust them when they give the weather report any more.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wondergirl
It hasn't been Journalism in a very long time...its Propaganda dissemination.
Notice how they avoid all of Hillary's frequent gaffs and open mouth, insert foot moments. Or her frequent Tirades and angry rages she is famous for by anyone who has been anywhere near her.
What he says in public (my Republican in-laws quoted him with great excitement after attending his rallies), what he said at the debates, what he tweets.... are all fake? His tv appearances at his rallies? He's on video. Those all have been tampered with?Quote:
Originally Posted by smoothy
At this point of the game.. I don't hold the RNC in much higher regard than I do the DNC.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wondergirl
Incidentally everything you see on TV is edited. Precious little is actually broadcast live. Raw footage gets filmed on location, it gets sent back to the office where editing takes place to clean it up and make it fit a given time frame all before its broadcast.
How do I know this, I have a longtime friend (17 years long) that owns a company that does this service for news crews that don't have full support staff locally...I also know half of the employees there. Almost went to work there 2 years ago.
In fact what little is live..really isn't actually live, but time shifted to varying degrees so someone can dump a determined amount of video in case someone drops an F bomb before it goes out on the air.
So Trump has not said anything I've seen him say on tv in real time? Even the debates were shams?Quote:
Originally Posted by smoothy
Another excuse to hide one's head in the sand.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wondergirl
Hide from what?Quote:
Originally Posted by Catsmine
And I, a Republican, had high hopes for an outsider like Trump.
Wow, nothing on that page is backed but any facts - it's total fear mongering at its worse. I'm ashamed for those that believe anything on that site.Quote:
Originally Posted by TxGreaseMonkey
If you believe the media who CLEARLY support ONLY the Democrat candidate ( as proven the last 8+ presidential elections I've noticed) then you aren't getting ANY of the facts.
They are just part of the Democrat campaign team and the Democrat party should be required to list their work as campaign contributions which clearly would violated campaign finance laws.
The media aren't held to the truth in advertising laws everyone else is. They commit libel on a daily basis.
NEW YORK – WND’s reporting in late August of a marked classified email Hillary Clinton forwarded to aide Huma Abedin could cast light on FBI Director James Comey’s dramatic disclosure to members of Congress Friday that the bureau had reopened its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server due to new information apparently discovered in the sexting probe of former Rep. Anthony Weiner, Abedin’s estranged husband.
Comey, however, said in his letter to Congress that he was only ‘briefed yesterday,’ meaning WND readers knew of the potential security breach two months before the director did.
As WND reported Sept. 8, Clinton forwarded an Aug. 8, 2009, email – clearly marked “Classified” – to a personal, nonsecure email address registered to aide Abedin, [email protected]. Abedin then forwarded the message to another personal, nonsecure account, [email protected].
In sworn testimony before Congress, however, Clinton declared, “There was nothing marked classified on my emails, either sent or received.”
The 2009 email, sent to Clinton from longtime adviser Sidney Blumenthal, was discovered in a cache of emails obtained by Judicial Watch through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. The exchange concerned the “disastrous nature” of an Obama trip to Germany, charging the U.S. was “totally out of the loop in Berlin – no ambassador,” resulting in the expectation that “Germans and Russians will now cut their own separate deals on energy, regional security, etc.”
WND also reported two-thirds of Abedin’s released emails were forwarded to personal addresses she controlled and Clinton’s State Department chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, may have received classified information through personal email accounts.
In WND’s report of the marked classified email, Greg Davis, a U.S. Army veteran with more than 30 years experience as a military intelligence officer, told WND the handling of the message is “an obvious violation of national security regulations regarding the handling of classified information for which people normally go to prison.”
Sign the precedent-setting petition supporting Trump’s call for an independent prosecutor to investigate Hillary Clinton!
Davis, the creator of the intelligence-oriented website SpookdBlog.com, said that typically the Justice Department would grant Abedin immunity from prosecution in return for her willingness to turn state’s evidence against Clinton.
“If Huma refused to cooperate, the Department of Justice could threaten to seek a maximum prison term for her should their effort to bring a criminal prosecution against her succeed,” he said at the time.
The email containing marked classified information previously was released by the State Department, but it was unknown until the Judicial Watch released that Clinton forwarded the exchange to Abedin’s nonsecure, personal Yahoo account.
See the classified email:
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2016/09/JUDICIAL-WATCH-huma-abedin-to-yahoo-account-BLUMENTHAL-CONFIDENTIAL-part-1.jpg
http://www.wnd.com/files/2016/09/JUD...IAL-part-1.jpgDavis’ LinkedIn biography reads: “30+ years in intelligence operations and analysis, with operational experience in every HUMINT (Human Intelligence) capacity including C1 (Command and Control), Special Operations, at the Defense Intelligence Agency and CIA, and analytical positions at Department of Defense, Defense Intelligence Agency, and State Department.”
Davis also holds a master’s degree in international economics from Georgetown University and the University of Oxford.
Related stories:
Hillary sent ‘marked classified’ info to nonsecure Abedin account
VIDEO: CLINTON EMAILS: STATE DEPARTMENT FOUGHT 'CLASSIFIED' MARK
Read more at Hillary sent ‘marked classified’ info to nonsecure Abedin account
Comey came forward today to prevent a public mutiny of seasoned FBI agents, who strongly opposed his handling of the Clinton email investigation. Steve Pieczenik has been saying members of the military, intelligence community, and FBI may do this, in order to save the republic from tyranny under Clinton. We may face a constitutional crisis, if a grand jury is not immediately convened. What the FBI found must be very serious. Carl Bernstein said it must be a "bombshell."
From the NY Post: http://nypost.com/2016/10/28/weiner-...probe/?ref=yfp
And it's already starting..
2 woman arrested for election fraud in Miami-Dade County | Miami Herald
Coego committed voter fraud to vote for a Republican, and Curgil for medical marijuana.Quote:
Originally Posted by smoothy
The terrible thing about voter fraud is the fraudulent votes won't be disallowed until after the Boards of Elections rule, likely sometime in 2020.State Board of Elections investigating possible voter fraud in Onslow County - WCTI
Hillary to be indicted after election:
Clinton scrambles following FBI announcement on new email evidence... Hillary To Be Indicted After Election: Trump Responds To FBI Investigation » Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!
http://www.infowars.com/a-vote-for-h...r-world-war-3/
Nope, more lies by you.Quote:
Hillary to be indicted after election:
The DNC has been arguing vote fraud is impossible despite ample proof its occurring, has occurred and will continue to occur as long as no id requirements are in place at.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wondergirl
Which is why voter ID requirements exist everyplace in the world except here in the USA and apparently Australia.
The DNC hasn't said it's "impossible," but it IS unlikely. Various sources cite that only 31 out of one billion ballots have been subject to in-person voter fraud. Each polling place is staffed by members of both parties and pledge to watch for voter fraud plus do whatever they can to prevent it (and report it, if it happens). Of course, like in the case cited, a Miami-Dade Republican voting official committed voter fraud. If you can't trust the officials....Quote:
Originally Posted by smoothy
There has been plenty of time to get voter ID passed. Nothing was accomplished. And even voter photo ID doesn't guarantee there won't be voter fraud. There will still be whining heard in the hallways.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wondergirl
Its not unlikely either... there have been ample situations in previous elections where results were statistically impossible, such as where republicans received ZERO votes... others where it has been proven move votes were cast than there were eligible adults of voting age living, much less the lower number of people actually registered, ACORN, several Democrat Politicians basted voting in two states, the Illinois Ballot box stuffing (what are party officials doing with Ballot boxes in their sole unsupervised posession anyway to "Forget" was in their trunk when they needed more numbers?) etc, etc.
And statistically a small percentage of those actually committing a crime at any time will actually be caught doing it shows its not impossible OR unlikely.
If it looks like a duck, yada, yada, yada,
Clinton Coup vs. Intelligence Community Counter-Coup
October 29, 2016 Dr. Steve R. Pieczenik, MD, PhD
http://stevepieczenik.com/wp-content...nknown-22.jpeg
America you are witnessing: Clinton Coup vs Counter-Coup by our Brave Intelligence Community!
In my last blog, I outlined the different nefarious methods that the Clintons used to initiate a coup against our government. They did not need soldiers or the use of any force. Through lying, obstruction of justice and the eventual compromise of the DOJ, FBI, WH, and CIA, they effectively took over the USG without one shot fired or even one vote for Hillary.
Trump’s forces understood that the political system was/is rigged. Yet all he could do was to vehemently point out the different parts of our USG which had been co-opted by the Clintons. Simultaneously, I have informally worked with certain elements of our military intelligence across the IC spectrum to use alt-media sources to expose the massive criminal behavior of the Clintons-past, present and future.
http://stevepieczenik.com/wp-content...nknown-21.jpeg
As a way of counter-acting the Clinton’s silent coup of corruption, these brave men and women of the IC have released a series of emails through Julian Assange and Wiki-Leaks which underscore the Clintons’ massive corruption attempts to take over our USG through the rigged electoral system.
Usually, a military coup presents itself with soldiers in the street and tanks splayed out all over Washington DC and at other key communications points in the USA.This time around there was a new type of Counter-coup, an Info-Counter Coup using Wiki-leaks. Wikileaks disseminates the truth around the world, while at the same time making sure that the FBI Director, James Comey, opened up the Uma Abedin files with regards to national security violations.
The FBI, with the assistance of their colleagues in the intelligence community, have forced HRC and Uma Abedin to address compromising issues that could eventually lead to the prosecution of Hillary and her staff. If she is elected to POTUS, there will be an effort on the part of the DOJ, FBI and others to impeach her for crimes and treason committed against the state.
http://stevepieczenik.com/wp-content...ages-38-1.jpeg
You are now witnessing a new type of American Revolution. The Clintons and Podesta initiated a silent coup to undermine the USG through corruption and co-optation of the elite political leaders. In turn, they were met by the by the silent counter-coup of our civilian/military Intelligence community. In the age of the internet, brave American warriors are everywhere. They monitor any internal/external attempts to undermine this great republic.
God Bless these Brave Men/Women and Our Great Republic!
Republicans received zero votes because no one voted for anyone in that party. I'm sure Democrats never get votes in my Republican home town in western NY.Quote:
Originally Posted by smoothy
I sure wish you'd document those allegations (and use reputable, unbiased sources, not Alex Jones).
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:23 AM. |