Above all else, Dr. Pieczenick is a truther, especially concerning Bush Jr., Cheeney, and Rumsfeld being responsible for 9/11. It was an inside job (false flag and stand down) to justify the war on terror.
|
Above all else, Dr. Pieczenick is a truther, especially concerning Bush Jr., Cheeney, and Rumsfeld being responsible for 9/11. It was an inside job (false flag and stand down) to justify the war on terror.
It is really sad, when some of you on here don't know "Jack S*** as to whether she is or is not. This place is full of PHD's who have appointed themselves with the honor. Anything listed so far is not proof per usual.
My latest counter-conspiracy theory is that all the people dying around the Clintons were killed by Putin to discredit her and because Trump is his sycophant.
How that is one that I would take to the Bank. LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by joypulv
At least I'm pretty sure I started it. Someone has to. My bank says it's worth 1/10 cent.
Just in (Fox News) Today
that Hillary had to leave the 9/11 event today due to a "medical episode". She had to be assisted to her vehicle by security personnel while stumbling off a curb and losing a shoe. Media was prevented from following her vehicle away from the ceremony so no one knows where she was taken, and, of course, her campaign staff would not provide any answers.
She left after 1 1/2 hours, saying she felt overheated, her staff said.
Hillary has now been diagnosed with pneumonia, which frequently is caused by PD. Many suffering from PD eventually die from pneumonia--I believe she has advanced PD.
But not in this case -- no PD. Advanced PD would put her in a nursing home.Quote:
Originally Posted by TxGreaseMonkey
Dr. Ted Noel's video buttresses my argument that Hillary has advanced PD:
https://video.search.yahoo.com/video...hrtab-901&tt=b
I've been spending time on Reddit where they have very civilized discussions. Posts like these would never see the light of day. This thread is sad, and threads like these seem to always be started by ultra-conservatives, why?
What is un civilized about this discussion? As far as threads like this being started by ultra-conservatives, I question. You sound like a ultra-liberal to make that statement. Maybe you need to spend more time on Reddit where the civilized live.Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedKarma
The name calling for one. Then the unproven claims. All to denigrate the candidate that is not yours.Quote:
What is un civilized about this discussion?
Why do I sound like an ultra-liberal?
Fascism of the left, by trying to suppress criticism?Quote:
I've been spending time on Reddit where they have very civilized discussions. Posts like these would never see the light of day. This thread is sad, and threads like these seem to always be started by ultra-conservatives, why?
Why because you come on the scene rather late and call some of us un-civilized. Did anyone call you a name other than expressing your personal preference politically ?Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedKarma
So unfounded conspiracy theories are labeled are "criticism" in your world. "Fascism"? I don't think you know what the word means nor how to use it properly, it's juts one of those buzzwords people use to try to shut down the other person and derail a discussion.
Don't get me wrong, you're free to say what you like, but we are free to call you on your BS as well. Right?
Not sure what that even means but it's not relevant.Quote:
because you come on the scene rather late
Well maybe just the one who used "narcissistic shrew". Point takenQuote:
call some of us un-civilized
Right, and your BS is no better than any one else's.
The optics of Hillary collapsing during the anniversary ceremony of 9/11 makes her unelectable.
Have you ever had pneumonia?Quote:
Originally Posted by TxGreaseMonkey
Wasn't there a president that had polio?
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:35 PM. |