Excon, if the Dems would start upholding their Constitutional responsibilities, including bringing appointments up for a vote as they are supposed to do, Bush wouldn't have to use recess appointments. I don't like recess appointments either, but major judicial and embassadorial positions cannot remain unfilled for an 18 month period. Seems to me that it is the Dems who are abusing the Constitution by not bringing appointments up for a vote so that they don't have to go on record as having voted for or against specific appointments. What choice does Bush have? Leave the positions vacant? Nuh, uh, that ain't going to work.
Elliot