Ask Me Help Desk - Can my Doctor withhold information which would prove a crime?

I have conclusive evidence that I have been given an incorrect diagnosis and my medical records have been falsified;

Evidence

I have recorded evidence that the statements made about me are false etc.
There is no evidence to support the diagnosis
I have written evidence from a doctor that the diagnosis is incorrect
The Trust has refused to answer my outstanding question concerning the diagnosis

However, I am finding it difficult to get a solicitor to advise me.

Is there anything I can do to get my case to court?

[QUOTE=rolandprecilla;2847087]
The Trust has refused to answer my outstanding question concerning the diagnosis

However, I am finding it difficult to get a solicitor to advise me.

Is there anything I can do to get my case to court?[/QUOTE

Who is the Trust, is that similar to the College of Physicians and Surgeons here in Canada? Probably you are having a problem finding a solicitor to take your case (and I am basing this on this WHOLE THREAD) is because you do not have a case, rollandprecilla. Your assumptions are incorrect, your assumptions do not hold water that is why you can't find a solicitor.

So, facing that, no, without a solicitor you can't get your case to court unless in the British court system you can represent yourself without solicitor, and in that case, you wouldn't have a chance because you really haven't got a leg to stand on.

You have been going on about this since November of last year.

Tick

[QUOTE=tickle;2847103]

Quote:

Originally Posted by rolandprecilla

The Trust has refused to answer my outstanding question concerning the diagnosis

However, I am finding it difficult to get a solicitor to advise me.

Is there anything I can do to get my case to court?[/QUOTE

Who is the Trust, is that similar to the College of Physicians and Surgeons here in Canada? Probably you are having a problem finding a solicitor to take your case (and i am basing this on this WHOLE THREAD) is because you do not have a case, rollandprecilla. Your assumptions are incorrect, your assumptions do not hold water that is why you can't find a solicitor.

So, facing that, no, without a solicitor you can't get your case to court unless in the British court system you can represent yourself without solicitor, and in that case, you wouldnt have a chance because you really havent got a leg to stand on.

You have been going on about this since November of last year.

tick

Yes I have been going on about this since last year, but only just realised that in fact I have a very strong case - based on a "breach of common law duty" regarding the diagnosis. So thank you for your encouraging message.

[QUOTE=rolandprecilla;2847111]

Quote:

Originally Posted by tickle

Yes I have been going on about this since last year, but only just realised that in fact I have a very strong case - based on a "breach of common law duty" regarding the diagnosis. So thank you for your encouraging message.

My 'encouraging message' was not meant to be facetious, it is fact, but I think you are answered out here and no further suggestions can be offered as you refuted all that was offered by our knowledgeable experts. So what is the point. Just do what you have to do, go to court with or without and get it over with and stop dithering about it.

Tick

If you really had a strong case, they why do you think no one will take it? Frankly, I think you have built this up in your mind to the point that you refuse to accept the facts.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ScottGem

If you really had a strong case, they why do you think no one will take it? Frankly, I think you have built this up in your mind to the point that you refuse to accept the facts.

Indeed I believe I have a strong case. The reason no one will take it is simply called "conflict of interest" because it involves the police.

The same applies to all responses received on this website, although I do appreciate them because the fact is victory is still guaranteed.

Quote:

Originally Posted by rolandprecilla

Indeed I believe I have a strong case. The reason no one will take it is simply called "conflict of interest" because it involves the police.

Hello r:

We get small town people here all the time telling us that lawyers won't take their cases because the lawyers are afraid of the local powers...

Of course, that's NUTS. Lawyers LOVE to sue the establishment... That's what they do. They exploit conflict. That's HOW they make their living.

If you're telling us the same thing, that's nuts too.

excon

Quote:

Originally Posted by excon

Hello r:

We get small town people here all the time telling us that lawyers won't take their cases because the lawyers are afraid of the local powers...

Of course, that's NUTS. Lawyers LOVE to sue the establishment... That's what they do. They exploit conflict. That's HOW they make their living.

If you're telling us the same thing, that's nuts too.

excon

As mentioned previously, the encouragement is much appreciated... next?