If woman where suddenly all born both sexed would they kill of men ? In like a natral selection sense

There's no way to answer this question.

There's no way to know what would happen if women were born "both sexed" because it's never happened, and it never will. Each woman would react differently.

The question is not about the question , the question is about the response

And to humble myself the reason I am interested in the response to a Q like this is because I feel as if that is maybe what they would do as I have observed myself, women seem to be very selfish and ignorant (no offence) I believe to be primeval

A totally natural thing from a primevial survival point of view, men less because naturally they are more expendable

Comment on Altenweg's post
And to humble myself the reason I am interested in the response to a Q like this is because I feel as if that is maybe what they would do as I have observed myself, women seem to be very selfish and ignorant (no offence) I believe to be primeval

Peter, if were a man's world, with men being "both sexed" as you call it, what do you think would happen then? Talk about selfish and ignorant (no offense)!! And who would clean the bathrooms?

Men and women do not think, solve problems, or contemplate issues with the same parts of the brain.

The thought processes are routed differently and analyzed in completely different areas in men,than it is in women s brains.
This could account for some of the problems we have understanding and communicating between the sexes.

If they killed all of us, who would kill spiders in the house and take out the garbage?

If we killed all of them who would we blame for causing all the traffic accidents and who would mend our laundry?

Seriously, men and women need each other for more than just procreation. Much more.

Quote:

---

I feel as if that is maybe what they would do as I have observed myself, women seem to be very selfish and ignorant (no offence)

---

You just called women selfish and ignorant and I'm not supposed to take offense to that? Seriously? :rolleyes:

Well, in light of that, seeing as I am a women, I'll answer the question. No, I wouldn't kill all the men, only those that thought of women as selfish and ignorant. :)

Peter, if you scroll to the bottom of the page you'll find the answer box. This is the option you should be using to respond to posts. The comment box is only for small comments, and it's limited. In the answer box you can type as much as you want.

You women are so defensive on the subject, I was not asking a question of men verses women, but a question of morals connected to natural selection! and my coment on women being ignorant was a phycological observation connected with survial in the natural environment as creatures of the natural environment, women can not help it , it is not a fault but a natural thing and the realiseation of it and acceptance of it could improve ones life. And as for being sexest I am not , in fact I do all house jobs etc even when I have a female partner. And I believe in equal rights and opportunities etc, nor am I rasist or agest ,etc. I am a logical person that sees all use in everything and everyone. So eally no offence OK.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by peterbranton

you women are so defensive on the subject

---

If we women called men selfish and ignorant, would you get a little riled?

You did not ask the question in a productive way that would elicit intelligent responses.

Women live longer than men, so it seems like we've figured out how to survive just fine without men. We take care of ourselves much better than men care for themselves -- physically, socially, spiritually, medically, emotionally.

Quote:

---

and my coment on women being ignorant was a phycological observation connected with survial in the natural environment as creatures of the natural environment, women can not help it , it is not a fault but a natural thing and the realiseation of it and acceptance of it could improve ones life.

---

So now we're naturally ignorant, but still, we should take no offense at this opinion, and it is opinion, far from fact. That's a pretty bold statement to make without any facts to back it up. I wonder if you would take offense to my saying that all men are sexist and egotistical. Luckily for you I don't lump people into categories based on their sex.

You may want to remember that there are a lot of women on this site. Trust me when I say that you've gotten lucky that the two women posting on this thread aren't selfish, or ignorant, nor are they easily offended.

In light of your recent post, I'm going to stick to the opinion I expressed in my second post. Lucky for you your hypothetical question would never occur. :)

OMG, I can't believe I'm reading this. Women are the most selfless creatures on earth. We bear the pain of childbirth, we are up at all hours feeding babies while the men sleep. We take care of our sick children and husbands. We take the kids to school and go to work just to come home and cook dinner, clean the house and help with homework.

It's quite apparent you have not had very much interaction with women. You feel it appropriate to criticize us and expect us not to take offense to your criticisms.

I will tell you that I am neither selfish or ignorant. I work 12 hour shifts at night to rush home at 7am to get the kids off to school, then to clean the house and get just a few hours of sleep before the kids come home from school and I have to go back to work.

I know many more selfish men than I do women.

I'm going to try and answer that question.

Just so I'm on the right track, are these killer robot babies? What happened to the exsisting people on the planet?

I'm guess I would leave it all up to Will Smith to save all the men, and hopefully fingers crossed, the credits would roll and I,in my little selfish way would get in my car and go home.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redhed35

im going to try and answer that question.

just so im on the right track, are these killer robot babies? what happened to the exsisting people on the planet?

im guess i would leave it all up to Will Smith to save all the men, and hopefully fingers crossed, the credits would roll and i,in my little selfish way would get in my car and go home.

---

:D:D:D:D:D Those are Greenies Red!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by peterbranton

you women are so defensive on the subject, i was not asking a question of men verses women, but a question of morals connected to natural selection ! , and my coment on women being ignorant was a phycological observation connected with survial in the natural environment as creatures of the natural environment, women can not help it , it is not a fault but a natural thing and the realiseation of it and acceptence of it could improve ones life. and as for being sexest i am not , infact i do all house jobs etc even when i have a female partner. and i beleive in equal rights and opportunities etc, nor am i rasist or agest ,etc. i am a logical person that sees all use in everything and everyone. so eally no offence ok.

---

Im afraid your mising the point here. You proclaim ignorance yet your question is one born of the fact that the logic in it is totally flawed and the basis has no standing.

Maybe you need to go study frogs. As they are omni sexual. You then can see your "natural selection" in progress. Humankind has evolved well beyond natural selection. We continue to evolve. Your question is also mute because we have evolved through technology to a point where man isn't really needed for the survival of the race. But making the statement like you have and the proclamations your making may put you first in line when it begins.

In the modern world we have individual roles. We each have our own attributes. Its no longer the hunter gatherer days like it was long long ago in the beginning. Do many women and many men share common traites of their sexes. Yes. But they are not overiding factors. They are a compliment that causes attraction to the oppisite sex.

You really need to rethink the basis of the question. Evolution is standing in your way.

Quote:

---

and to humble myself the reason I am interested in the response to a Q like this is because I feel as if that is maybe what they would do as I have observed myself, women seem to be very selfish and ignorant (no offence) I believe to be primeval

---

To base such a sweeping generality of over half the population of Earth on observations of a single person , that are limited to the surrounding area cannot be valid data.

Your observations may be valid but cannot be applied to all women. Only the ones that were observed to be like you describe.
Even then their actions may have have misinterpreted by you and not be valid.

What percentage of the 3.1 billion women on Earth have you observed?
It cannot possibly be enough to draw any conclusions that could be applied to any significant number of the female population.

The logic, method, and data are all moot due to lack of information on the scale that would be required to validate any such theory.

To martinizing2, your comment is invalid as you coment saying it is impossible to acumilate knowledge of phycology unless you test half the world pop. Lol you are obviously not a science person! You obviously have very little or no idea what you are commenting on if fact the only reason you are commmenting is to try and strengthen your position in the pack (on here) but thanks any way your comment was also useful for me to observe

Scientific experiments are rarly proformed on half or even near half the pop of the world ! But my observations strech over many years and in many different countries so my reseach is actually quite extensive. The people that are getting defensive really you are not understanding it at all , you are merly trying to turn it into something nasty, un acceptable! I sugest you all learn pyhcology!

I know psychology (not phycology). Taken all of the courses in college, and use it on a daily basis at work.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by peterbranton

scientific experiments are rarly proformed on half or even near half the pop of the world ! but my observations strech over many years and in many different countries so my reseach is actually quite extensive. the people that are getting defencive really you are not understanding it at all , you are merly trying to turn it into some thing nasty, un acceptable!, i sugest you all learn pyhcology !!

---

Why don't you use spell check?

Its difficult to take your argument seriously when your spelling is really quite atroscious.

Is english your second language?

Atroscious, such a great word, its rarely one gets to use it.