I understand that the court may use the circumstances and level of commitment of petitioners in deciding an adoption petition (as factors, not determinative alone) based on "the best interests of the child" standard. I wanted to be clear that it was not a preclusive factor. You mentioned that Utah uses it as an exclusion, do you have authority for that (I did a quick westlaw search, but only found one case that said it could be considered as a factor only, though admittedly I did not spend a lot of time searching (I also realize that in practice outcomes can be decided for other than the legal reasonings listed). This was more of a "state of the law" question.
If I understand you correctly, there is no legal preclusion then of a single/unmarried person from adopting (which was my understanding).

