Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #141

    Mar 31, 2013, 04:05 PM
    No but I would change them to be fair. I mean forcing a bankruptcy to make investors rich and destroy the lives of MILLIONS is fair to you?

    Last I checked those investors are still making money. And workers have a job.
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #142

    Mar 31, 2013, 04:31 PM
    Fair ? What skin do the workers have in the game ? They do a job and get paid .You think the bond holders are just a bunch of greedy capitalists who were ripe to be screwed. To hell with the retires who had money in funds with GM holdings .They don't deserve the protection of the rule of law either . In Obamanation ;the Emperor makes the rules ;even if they violate years of law .
    talaniman's Avatar
    talaniman Posts: 54,325, Reputation: 10855
    Expert
     
    #143

    Mar 31, 2013, 04:42 PM
    I guess their lively hood and future isn't skin enough.
    paraclete's Avatar
    paraclete Posts: 2,706, Reputation: 173
    Ultra Member
     
    #144

    Mar 31, 2013, 07:15 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    fair ? What skin do the workers have in the game ? They do a job and get paid .You think the bond holders are just a bunch of greedy capitalists who were ripe to be screwed. To hell with the retires who had money in funds with GM holdings .They don't deserve the protection of the rule of law either . In Obamanation ;the Emperor makes the rules ;even if they violate years of law .
    I expect no one explained risk to you, stockholders acquire certain risk and so do bondholders. It is unfortunate that some securities are more risky than others, you want security invest in government bonds because any additional yield on other securities is compensation for risk.

    GM was rescued, not for the benefit of investors but for the benefit of employees and the national economy. What was already lost was lost due to inept management. I expect it cost you some money, that's sad Tom but we all experience loss in these difficult times unless we become risk averse
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #145

    Apr 1, 2013, 05:11 AM
    GM was "rescued " as a political payback to the UAW . Ask the non-union employees of the GM chain if the government gave a rat's a$$ about them .$1 billion went to Delphi's union retirees, their non-union retirees nothing.
    Ask the thousands of dealership employees who lost their jobs because they worked in dealerships owned by Republicans if the Obots cared about employees . The bailout violated every fundamental principle of America's bankruptcy code, undermined the rule of law, and cost taxpayers an extra $26.5 billion.
    Had GM gone through chapter 11 ;the company and the employees would be on firmer ground. All the bailout was ,was picking the pockets of taxpayers and bond holders and giving that theft to the union.
    Obama's own car czar Steve Rattner admitted, “We should have asked the UAW to do a bit more. We did not ask any UAW member to take a cut in their pay.”
    Obama said “The free market has never been a free license to take whatever you want from whoever you can. It only works when there are rules of the road to ensure that competition is fair, open, and honest,”
    Yes it does work when “the rules ” are honored.The GM bailout violated all the rules.
    paraclete's Avatar
    paraclete Posts: 2,706, Reputation: 173
    Ultra Member
     
    #146

    Apr 1, 2013, 05:49 AM
    Well tom a few other things violated the rules too like selling junk Bonds around the world while giving the an AAA rating. WhatI see is the system is broken and unbridled capitalism isn't the answer. We have had this answer before there are winners and loosers
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #147

    Apr 1, 2013, 06:02 AM
    unbridled capitalism
    putting words in my mouth again ? The whole bankruptcy system is a form of regulating . Unbridled capitalism ;if it was ever truly practiced ,is something that happened well before the beginning of the last century.
    Look ;I know our laws differ from yours . I just want us to honor our laws . You can do in your country as you wish.
    smoothy's Avatar
    smoothy Posts: 25,490, Reputation: 2853
    Uber Member
     
    #148

    Apr 1, 2013, 06:20 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    GM was "rescued " as a political payback to the UAW . Ask the non-union employees of the GM chain if the government gave a rat's a$$ about them .$1 billion went to Delphi's union retirees, their non-union retirees nothing.
    Ask the thousands of dealership employees who lost their jobs because they worked in dealerships owned by Republicans if the Obots cared about employees . The bailout violated every fundamental principle of America's bankruptcy code, undermined the rule of law, and cost taxpayers an extra $26.5 billion.
    Had GM gone through chapter 11 ;the company and the employees would be on firmer ground. All the bailout was ,was picking the pockets of taxpayers and bond holders and giving that theft to the union.
    Obama's own car czar Steve Rattner admitted, “We should have asked the UAW to do a bit more. We did not ask any UAW member to take a cut in their pay.”
    Obama said “The free market has never been a free license to take whatever you want from whoever you can. It only works when there are rules of the road to ensure that competition is fair, open, and honest,”
    Yes it does work when “the rules ” are honored.The GM bailout violated all the rules.
    The UAW retired Union employees.got raped by Obama during the GM Bankrpucy... My Father was a retired UAW union employee... he died the year he retired... my 78 year old mother lost all of her medical and much of her survivor benefits... with that bankruptcy.

    The retired WHITE COLLAR non-union employees kept all of theirs...
    speechlesstx's Avatar
    speechlesstx Posts: 1,111, Reputation: 284
    Ultra Member
     
    #149

    Apr 1, 2013, 10:24 AM
    Beware April Fools also...

    The racist menace? Muslims declare victory in fight over ‘anti-Islamic’ Lego

    Apparently 'Jabba’s Palace’ looks a little much like a mosque?
    Attached Images
     
    paraclete's Avatar
    paraclete Posts: 2,706, Reputation: 173
    Ultra Member
     
    #150

    Apr 1, 2013, 01:16 PM
    Steriotypes
    smoothy's Avatar
    smoothy Posts: 25,490, Reputation: 2853
    Uber Member
     
    #151

    Apr 1, 2013, 03:05 PM
    Muslims as troglodytes isn't a stereotype... its a proven fact.
    paraclete's Avatar
    paraclete Posts: 2,706, Reputation: 173
    Ultra Member
     
    #152

    Apr 1, 2013, 03:22 PM
    I think Jabba the hut is actually a capitalist steriotype not a muslim one but I see the likeness of the St Sofia mosque. The muslims are stuck in a time warp, just like some others I know, they choose to be there and to take offense at whatever the west does. They even take offense at their own because deep down they know their religion is flawed. When you can't laugh at yourselves you are in big trouble
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #153

    Apr 2, 2013, 04:15 AM
    Beware April fools indeed . I have been predicting that the Aussies will fall under the Chinese sphere of influence . It is happening even faster than I realized.
    A month ago we pointed out that as a result of Australia's unprecedented reliance on China as a target export market, accounting for nearly 30% of all Australian exports (with the flipside being just as true, as Australia now is the fifth-biggest source of Chinese imports), the two countries may as well be joined at the hip.
    Over the weekend, Australia appears to have come to the same conclusion, with the Australian reporting that the land down under is set to say goodbye to the world's "reserve currency" in its trade dealings with the world's biggest marginal economic power, China, and will enable the direct convertibility of the Australian dollar into Chinese yuan, without US Dollar intermediation,.
    Thanks, World Reserve Currency, But No Thanks: Australia And China To Enable Direct Currency Convertibility | Zero Hedge
    paraclete's Avatar
    paraclete Posts: 2,706, Reputation: 173
    Ultra Member
     
    #154

    Apr 2, 2013, 04:37 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    Beware April fools indeed . I have been predicting that the Aussies will fall under the Chinese sphere of influence . It is happening even faster than I realized.


    Thanks, World Reserve Currency, But No Thanks: Australia And China To Enable Direct Currency Convertibility | Zero Hedge
    So what we are saying is the american's don't get their cut. Tough isn't it. Actually you should think of the Australian dollar as a reserve currency it is directly negotiable in a number of countries and worth more than the Yankee dollar. Look we are going to grow food and other agricultural products for China, we don't see this as negative thing, they have a market that is opening very quickly to high end products which we have an ability to meet and they aren't as queesy about certain things as you are and certainly not as protective. You had the opportunity to do the right thing with the FTA and you screwed us like you do everyone
    smoothy's Avatar
    smoothy Posts: 25,490, Reputation: 2853
    Uber Member
     
    #155

    Apr 2, 2013, 04:48 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by paraclete View Post
    so what we are saying is the american's don't get their cut. tough isn't it. actually you should think of the Australian dollar as a reserve currency it is directly negotiable in a number of countries and worth more than the Yankee dollar. look we are going to grow food and other agricultural products for China, we don't see this as negative thing, they have a market that is opening very quickly to high end products which we have an ability to meet and they arn't as queesy about certain things as you are and certainly not as protective. you had the opportunity to do the right thing with the FTA and you screwed us like you do everyone
    You need to get over yourselves... or at least pay more attention to how China REALLY treats its subjects.
    paraclete's Avatar
    paraclete Posts: 2,706, Reputation: 173
    Ultra Member
     
    #156

    Apr 2, 2013, 04:50 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by smoothy View Post
    You need to get over yourselves....or at least pay more attention to how China REALLY treats its subjects.
    We are not Chinese subjects, we trade with them, would you have us ignore them and leave the field to you? IIt doesn't work that way. We opened diplomatic dialogue with China while you were still playing cold war
    smoothy's Avatar
    smoothy Posts: 25,490, Reputation: 2853
    Uber Member
     
    #157

    Apr 2, 2013, 04:51 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by paraclete View Post
    we are not Chinese subjects, we trade with them
    Bwaaaaahahahaha... yeah... for now... but not forever.
    paraclete's Avatar
    paraclete Posts: 2,706, Reputation: 173
    Ultra Member
     
    #158

    Apr 2, 2013, 04:54 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by smoothy View Post
    Bwaaaaahahahaha.....yeah.....for now.....but not forever.
    So you may not last forever yourselves, nothing lasts forever
    smoothy's Avatar
    smoothy Posts: 25,490, Reputation: 2853
    Uber Member
     
    #159

    Apr 2, 2013, 05:02 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by paraclete View Post
    so you may not last forever yourselves, nothing lasts forever
    Talk to Taiwan... and Japan... for that matter talk to the People in HongKong.

    Yeah... you should love them when they decide to flex their muscle...
    tomder55's Avatar
    tomder55 Posts: 1,742, Reputation: 346
    Ultra Member
     
    #160

    Apr 2, 2013, 05:13 AM
    Exactly... soon their hegemony will draw you into their geopolitical sphere of influence.

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 

Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.


Check out some similar questions!

Should a one-year lease dated March 27th end on March 31st? [ 5 Answers ]

The apartment is a Tax Credit Sec. 42 apartment and my mom and I are approved Tax Credit Tenants. The owner/manager has been trying to get rid of my mom and me for months... probably even before we moved in. Two months after move-in, I was asked to swing by the office to sign a TIC. (Whaa? I...

How did I false a swab for cocaine 5 days later passed a hair follicle any ides [ 2 Answers ]

Hello all.. I'm writing in regards too I'm a very confused.. mother who has been torn down from the all hell the system puts you through I'm been dealing with dcs for approx 2 yrs 12 days got my youngest baby back and my two oldest were put up termination.. my concern is 3 days before my case...

F-1 Jan-March 07 and became an H1-B since March 07 [ 1 Answers ]

I'm single, and I have more than the 180 something days that the presence test requires. I think I can fill form 1040EZ because H1B holders pay taxes like a normal resident. So my question is, can I use form 1040EZ for my taxes, or which form do I need? What if I was working from Jan to...

Beware of Xylitol [ 1 Answers ]

We visited the dog guide school school recently. Thought I would share some of what I learned. One of their veterinarians gave a talk on current hazards. Xylitol, a newer artificial sweetener finding wide use in sugar free gums, is very bad for dogs, see...


View more questions Search