Ask Me Help Desk - Kam and Walz 2nd Amendment

Kam and Walz 2nd Amendment

This is what we know .

Walz says that he used to keep a shotgun in his truck at school so he could hunt pheasants. In other words he believes the framers added the 2nd amendment so he could hunt small game .

Be vewy vewy quiet I’m hunting wabbits!! �� (youtube.com)

As a Rep of a conservative district from 2007 to 2019 he was pro-2nd amendment. But Minnesota is a blue leaning state. So to become Guv he flipflopped . He went from an A to an F rating by the NRA.
He said that he decided that we should not have 2nd amendment rights "for the kids" (you know ....the kids they don't want ) .

Now Kam the Sham claims to be gun friendly because she claims to own a "Glock" . What kind of Glock ? That wasn't asked by Whitaker on 60 Minutes. There are over 34 models available.
34 Different Types of Glocks Explained | Craft Holsters®

She says she even shoots it at a shooting range. Does that mean she thinks the 2nd amendment is for recreational shooting at a range? (expect to see video of her doing target practice in the coming days )

She says her law enforcement background proves she is pro-2nd amendment. But she was never a cop. She was a lawyer in a DAs office and rose to become AG of California .

But what does she REALLY think about gun ownership ? 2019 she said that if she were elected she would impose a " mandatory buy back"... gun confiscation by fiat.

Kamala Harris on a mandatory buyback program 2019 (youtube.com)

Let's face the facts . The Dems want to scrap the Constitution .

Walz says "Electoral College needs to go" (msn.com)

They want to scrap the electoral college because it appears to be working against them. However, if that reverses, then they'll be all for it. Pragmatism rules the day.

Kam's campaign distanced itself from the comment.

Quote:

Getting rid of the Electoral College is not a position the campaign holds, a campaign official said.

Walz says "Electoral College needs to go," but campaign says that's not its position - CBS News

That's really funny. "It is the official position of the Harris campaign that our VP nominee doesn't know what he's talking about."

“I have a habit of speaking before I think on some things,” Mr. Walz told an audience of donors in Nevada

“Nine weeks ago, I was sitting in my house, minding my own damn business,” he said, to a wave of laughter. “And now I’m here, trying to do my best, at times saying stupid things,”

Tim Walz Takes His Folksiness on the Road, Trying Not to Say ‘Stupid Things’ - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

Walz is running with the position that being a knucklehead is a positive .

As for Kam ;hard to know what she thinks .
Flashback 2019 She was "open " to abolishing the electoral college (6:36 mark of interview )
Senator Kamala Harris on Running for President, Electoral College, Her Family & Star Wars (youtube.com)

Kam the Sham with a Glock is as believable as Mike Dukakis in a tank.

https://www.usnews.com/object/image/...=responsive640

Quote:

Originally Posted by tomder55

“I have a habit of speaking before I think on some things,” Mr. Walz told an audience of donors in Nevada

“Nine weeks ago, I was sitting in my house, minding my own damn business,” he said, to a wave of laughter. “And now I’m here, trying to do my best, at times saying stupid things,”

Tim Walz Takes His Folksiness on the Road, Trying Not to Say ‘Stupid Things’ - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

Walz is running with the position that being a knucklehead is a positive .

What is Trump's excuse for his rambling wordsalads and dementia?

please provide examples.

Quote:

please provide examples.

My thought exactly. I doubt if an example will be forthcoming. TDS is not based upon real life.

But I am happy to see WG post again. Hope you are doing well.

Quote:

“And now I’m here, trying to do my best, at times saying stupid things,”

Pretty sound judgment by the governor.

Don't you watch Trump and listen to his speeches???

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LgjFr-LjN8I

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9qL64xsumw

If your brother or sister or wife acted and talked like that, you'd strongly suggest medical intervention! My SIL was like Trump, rambling, lying (e.g., she claimed she ate only lettuce and cheese), confused sentences that didn't make sense, etc. She died of dementia. Her younger sister talks and acts like that. Diagnosed as having early Alzheimer's (dementia). She's in rehab (no progress toward normal speech and behavior) and is headed for a nursing home this week

Against my better judgement, I listened to the first YouTube clip. I found nothing at all that suggested any mental impairment such as, for instance. Governor Walz saying he had become good friends with the school shooters during his VP debate. So perhaps you could be SPECIFIC as to what you found that was objectionable. In order to avoid being disappointed, I already expect no meaningful response at all, but I sincerely hope you prove me wrong.

No I do not watch comic Seth Meyers late night no ratings critiques of Trump . As with the other comics on late night ;Colbert , Kimmel and Jimmy Fallon who could not come up with an original thought without their team of over paid staff writers ;their opinions don't matter . At least when Jon Stewart does a skit it is half way amusing .

As for the interview with Levin ;where is Trump wrong ?

ok let me explain Watergate better than Trump ...not that he is wrong in his critique.

1 . Watergate was a personal vendetta by FBI deputy director who had a beef with Nixon because he thought he should be appointed director after J Edgar Hoover was planted . (the FBI vs the President ..... sound familiar?)

2. Both Houses of Congress were overwhelming Dem .If they voted to convict it would stick and Nixon forcibly removed..
He opted to not have a Constitutional crisis .
Being the patriotic statesman he was ;he had once before opted for what was good for the country over what was right and fair . I am speaking of the 1960 election when he opted to not contest or dispute the JFK steal of the election.

3 . How quaint it would be these days for the President to take responsibility for the actions of staffers. Nixon did not break into Watergate or order it to be done. But his operatives did the deed at the direction of his staffers .

4 , He could've easily destroyed the smoking gun tapes just like Evita scrubbed her server or Bubba had Sandy Burger go the the National Archives to pilfer documents that were incriminating to him and his pi$$ poor foreign policy regarding al Qaeda .

5. The Repub party was not the almost conservative party it is today in 1974. It was populated by northern "Rockefeller limousine liberals 'who were not much different than the Dems of the day. Both sides hated Nixon because he was disrupting their global initiatives .(Don't forget that the deep state put a bullet in JFK s head for defying their desire to have an endless war in South East Asia. ) Nixon was working on peace initiative and indeed had a plan to end the Vietnam war . The Repub establishment did not have Nixon's back.

Trump has felt the wrath of the deep state for similar reasons. From Trump's perspective it would have been logical for Nixon to fight on . Trump was impeached twice and never convicted . So yeah it is logical for his to suggest that Nixon gave up too easily .

Walz channeled his best Elmer Fudd to prove he likes guns

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GZw4YRfX...g&name=360x360

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...-ElmerFudd.png

Quote:

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

Against my better judgement, I listened to the first YouTube clip. I found nothing at all that suggested any mental impairment such as, for instance. Governor Walz saying he had become good friends with the school shooters during his VP debate. So perhaps you could be SPECIFIC as to what you found that was objectionable. In order to avoid being disappointed, I already expect no meaningful response at all, but I sincerely hope you prove me wrong.

Watch him on tv. Listen to his broken sentences, word ramblings, lies, misinformation, craziness, and mean-spirited speeche.

If you consider that sanity, I have a bridge to sell you.

Quote:

Watch him on tv. Listen to his broken sentences, word ramblings, lies, misinformation, craziness, and mean-spirited speeche.

Please stop. You have been asked repeatedly to provide specifics which you clearly cannot do. Your postings just seem to be a type of "speeche" motivated by TDS. At some point you have to provide evidence.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

Please stop. You have been asked repeatedly to provide specifics which you clearly cannot do. Your postings just seem to be a type of "speeche" motivated by TDS. At some point you have to provide evidence.

Watch him, listen to him. I don't need to post evidence. He is his own worst enemy! Your eyes and ears (and hopefully your brain) will see and hear -- and know!!!

Quote:

I don't need to post evidence

Lame response if there ever was one. You don't post evidence because you don't have any.

I'll give you an example to show how it's done. This is from KH. She was answering (if you can call it that) a question about what she called opponent Donald Trump’s fixation on crime in Democrat-run cities. See if you can figure this out.

Quote:

“I talked with somebody once who said, ‘You know, if you just look at, where the stars are in the sky. Don’t look [at] ’em as just random things, if you just look at ’em as points,’ ” Harris responded. ” ‘Look at the constellation — what does it show you?’
“So you just outlined it, Roland, what does it show you? That the cities that he picks on in terms of black population or black mayor or both,” she said. “C’mon.”

Even worse, she is claiming, accidentally, that black cities with black mayors tend to have high crime rates.

Kamala delivers new baffling word salad involving constellations and crime, gets dubbed ‘Galileo Harris’ (msn.com)

Quote:

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

Lame response if there ever was one. You don't post evidence because you don't have any.

Apparently, you haven't read that website either. And must be MAGAites. Or watched and listened to him (even on Fox News he was a bumbling idiot!) I cannot believe how two educated and usually sane men like you and tomder don't see through Trump. Even our cat howls in agony when he's on tv.

I am clear headed and have no delusions . To me this is not a character election. I know where the respective candidates will lead the nation. Sometimes flawed people make good leaders ;and sometimes saints fail to lead. The examples of that are too many to mention.

So even if Trump is all you say he is ;in my mind he will be a better President because he has done so in the past . When Kam came up to the plate this term she has either whiffed or has been a no show. She did succeed in the one thing the Dems did intentionally . They intentionally created the inflation that is destroying the middle class they pretend to champion. She cast the deciding vote as President of the Senate to get that done.

I will keep on posting this Jim Clyburn comment.
Democrat Rep. Jim Clyburn Admits Democrats "KNEW" Inflation Would Result From Their Big Spending (youtube.com)

Quote:

Apparently, you haven't read that website either

Uhm...you haven't posted a website to read. You posted two youtube clips. I listened to one which had no evidence at all of slurred speech or mental confusion. The only mental confusion I'm seeing is from you when you complain about me not reading a Youtube clip. At any rate, you've already stated you don't need to post evidence because...well, just because.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

Uhm...you haven't posted a website to read. You posted two youtube clips. I listened to one which had no evidence at all of slurred speech or mental confusion. The only mental confusion I'm seeing is from you when you complain about me not reading a Youtube clip. At any rate, you've already stated you don't need to post evidence because...well, just because.

How about this:
"Should Google be broken up?” interviewer John Micklethwait, editor in chief of Bloomberg News, asked Trump on Tuesday.
Trump’s immediate response, in full:
"I just haven’t gotten over something the Justice Department did yesterday, where Virginia cleaned up its voter rolls and got rid of thousands and thousands of bad votes. And the Justice Department sued them, that they should be allowed to put those bad votes and illegal votes back in and let the people vote. So I haven’t — I haven’t gotten, I haven’t gotten over that. A lot of people have seen that and they can’t even believe it."

And there's more.

https://www.salon.com/2024/10/16/his...a5f5c89032d102

I wrote about the Feds suing Va in support of illegal voters here

Election steal the 2024 edition - Page 2 (askmehelpdesk.com)

You posted, "Should Google be broken up?” interviewer John Micklethwait, editor in chief of Bloomberg News, asked Trump on Tuesday.

The full question was as follows. "Maybe we can change the subject to technology, seeing you wouldn’t answer about the Federal Reserve. The US Justice Department is thinking about breaking up Alphabet as Google likes to be known now, should Google be broken up?"

So, when we are honest enough to include the entire question (you were not), then his answer, in going to the Justice Department, makes a great deal more sense. He didn't just pull it out of thin air.

Perfect example of why you should avoid using Trump-hating websites. The question is at about the 40 minute mark below. Took me all of about ten minutes to find this. Shame on you.

Donald Trump Economic Club of Chicago | Rev

Quote:

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

You posted, "Should Google be broken up?” interviewer John Micklethwait, editor in chief of Bloomberg News, asked Trump on Tuesday.

The full question was as follows. "Maybe we can change the subject to technology, seeing you wouldn’t answer about the Federal Reserve. The US Justice Department is thinking about breaking up Alphabet as Google likes to be known now, should Google be broken up?"

And what did Trump say then in answer to that question? (I'm very sure he doesn't know what Google is or how to use it. Has he ever touched a computer keyboard? Does he own and use a tablet?)

If he doesn't know how to use Google, then perhaps he's in the same boat that you sometimes appear to be in. As I posted earlier, it took me all of about ten minutes to find the full question. I would not like to think that you didn't look because you didn't care enough about the truth to make the effort. I much prefer to think that you simply don't know how.

As to Trump's answer, he did what pols do repeatedly. He simply pivoted to an area that he considered to be more important, or possibly less threatening. Harris does that repeatedly. Watch the Fox interview if you want to know more about that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

If he doesn't know how to use Google, then perhaps he's in the same boat that you sometimes appear to be in. As I posted earlier, it took me all of about ten minutes to find the full question. I would not like to think that you didn't look because you didn't care enough about the truth to make the effort. I much prefer to think that you simply don't know how.

Of course I know how to Google! I was a public librarian for almost 30 years. The shoe didn't fit for finding it and providing the correct answer (what he should have said), but since he doesn't know what the heck Google is, he sidestepped the question and ran off onto another topic.

Quote:

As to Trump's answer, he did what pols do repeatedly. He simply pivoted to an area that he considered to be more important, or possibly less threatening. Harris does that repeatedly. Watch the Fox interview if you want to know more about that.

Ha ha ha ha ha!!! "he pivoted". Nope, he totally ignored it, not having the faintest idea about the question and how to answer it.

And Brett Baby didn't give Harris time to respond but rattled on and on with his own take on things. (And yes, I watched the interview in real time.)

Quote:

Of course I know how to Google!

Yeah. You just choose not to. Ignorance fueled by TDS is a terrible flaw with you.

Quote:

but since he doesn't know what the heck Google is

The person who cannot seem to use Google somehow knows that another person doesn't know what it is? That's a little hard to believe.

Quote:

Nope, he totally ignored it, not having the faintest idea about the question and how to answer it.

More TDS fueled conjecture.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

Yeah. You just choose not to. Ignorance fueled by TDS is a terrible flaw with you.

The person who cannot seem to use Google somehow knows that another person doesn't know what it is? That's a little hard to believe.

More TDS fueled conjecture.

Goodbye!

I'm sorry to hear that, but you need to learn that your posts here will be examined and reflected on. It reminds me of the old saying, "If you can't stand the heat, then get out of the kitchen." And that's not to mention that you reply in a straightforward fashion as well. Note below.

Quote:

Ha ha ha ha ha!!! "he pivoted".

Apparently, you haven't read that website either. And must be MAGAites.

I cannot believe how two educated and usually sane men like you and tomder don't see through Trump. Even our cat howls in agony when he's on tv.

I would encourage you to hang tough and defend your views.

Dems still trying to gaslight on guns . To prove he is an everyday American man ;Missouri Dem candidate Lucas Kunce ;who is 'gunning " for Josh Hawley's Senate seat was taking target practice as a range with former Repub ;former Kangaroo court member Adam Kinsinger . Problem was that he almost killed a reporter by taking shots at a steel target at close range. The ricochet wounded a tv reporter .

KC reporter struck by bullet fragment at Lucas Kunce shooting range campaign event