 |
Being questioned about the lack of testing, Donald Trump said:
"When you test, you have a case. When you test, you find something is wrong with people. If we didn't do any testing, we'd have very few cases."
Read that again. Make sure you understand what this self-proclaimed genius is saying.
If you think it's being taken out of context, there are videos of his exact words all over the internet.
This absence of sane leadership is killing Americans.
so there is a lot that could be read into this:
we arn't doing enough testing
China didn't do enough testing
we are idiots
I am an idiot
Obama didn't leave enough stocks of tests
elect me because I'm the one who is the war time CIC
Yes, you could be an idiot, (your own words) but the words Trump spoke mean what they mean. Not hard to understand. They show a mind that is failing.Quote:
Originally Posted by paraclete
His words show he is a big fat lying cheating dufus like all his other words and wants to get re elected to stay out of jail like his other cronies, and sycophants. Different day, same crap.
Thank you for that thoughtful, unbiased, impartial analysis. "...a big fat lying cheating dufus..." Hmmm. One of the worst cases of TDS I've ever seen.Quote:
His words show he is a big fat lying cheating dufus like all his other words and wants to get re elected to stay out of jail like his other cronies, and sycophants.
In the meantime, in the world of truth, the Biden camp has criticized Cathryn Herridge for her reporting on the unmasking story. The tweet read, "Catherine Herridge is a partisan, rightwing hack who is a regular conduit for conservative media manipulation ploys because she agrees to publicize things before contacting the target to ask for comment." The tweet was later removed after someone, I suppose, realized the optics were not good. So when a reporter doesn't get in touch with Biden BEFORE posting a story, then they get hammered? Herridge was also the reporter who did the interview with AG Barr that Chuck Todd later disgracefully and dishonestly reported on, an action which drew a collective "yawn" from the holier than thou crowd here since they couldn't pin it on Trump. It's the same "yawn" that has been expressed over the Tara Reade allegations and thus fulfills the general motto: If Trump does it, then we go insane. If a liberal dem does it, then its OK. The three here in question, unsurprisingly, are all liberal dems.
So is Joe Biden now the anti-female candidate?? Huh. Sure starting to look that way.
Trump's mind is failing? At least he still knows where he is and who he is.
No I wasn't speaking about me I was speaking as if I were TrumpQuote:
Originally Posted by Athos
Sorry. I misread your post.
1. Are you a doctor? You say I'm suffering from some derangement because I tell the truth about the guy whose arse you have your head stuck up shoulder deep? I think it's you suffering from TDS.
2. Unmasking is done as a matter of routine when monitoring foreign governments. Whether they are talking to Americans, or about them. Not surprised lowly informed right wing loonies make a conspiracy about one of them. Todd apologized, but the dufus never has, something you never acknowledged in your loony mind. Facts matter, except in Loonyville. If a dem does anything you loonies go insane.
3. Another conspiracy theory by the wingers!
4. Yes the dufus knows he is in the WH lying, cheating, and stealing like he did before he got to the WH.
Don't sully yourself.Quote:
Originally Posted by paraclete
If you want to be thought of as something beyond an ignorant, vulgar, half-brained dimwit, you probably should try saying something that at least sounds intelligent. Many of your comments are what I used to hear from my elementary school students. It didn't surprise me from them, but you are supposed to be an adult. Why don't you try acting like one.Quote:
whose arse you have your head stuck up shoulder deep?
"a big fat lying cheating dufus." This is what passes for the truth now?Quote:
I tell the truth about the guy
You missed the point.Quote:
Unmasking is done as a matter of routine when monitoring foreign governments.
There was no conspiracy theory.Quote:
Another conspiracy theory by the wingers!
How many times must you be told I don't give a rats patoot about what you or you loons think about my words actions or behavior. Seems you would be more concerned with extricating your heads from the arse of the most immoral president in history than trying to chunk your silly stupid rocks at a citizen try to wake you the freak up from your delusions.
Now do the right thing and repent your support for a liar and cheater, or be condemned for eternity in your own hellfire. Let me borrow your bible to beat you upside your head because these rock just bounce off your skull!
No I ain't mad, just revved up by your ignorance and stubborn hypocrisy. You wingers are NUTS!
Kind of gets you stirred up when it comes back at you, doesn't it? Well, I see you are passing on the "adult" thing. Oh well.Quote:
How many times must you be told I don't give a rats patoot about what you or you loons think about my words actions or behavior. Seems you would be more concerned with extricating your heads from the arse of the most immoral president in history than trying to chunk your silly stupid rocks at a citizen try to wake you the freak up from your delusions.
Look, I can talk with just about anyone. We have had some informative and enjoyable exchanges, but I'm not going to go along with your senseless, vulgar comments. If that's where this is going, then it won't work. That is up to you.
If you can pass on the adult thing and lie why are you surprised that I can pass on the adult thing with the truth?Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
No, you look at yourself, at what you write and how you write it. Your false statements and passive aggressive dismissals won't go unchallenged. Nor will your falsehoods. If that won't work for you, too bad, that's up to you. You want to play nice, then play nice. That's up to you too.Quote:
Look, I can talk with just about anyone. We have had some informative and enjoyable exchanges, but I'm not going to go along with your senseless, vulgar comments. If that's where this is going, then it won't work. That is up to you.
We can play any way you want too!
Done. So much childishness is enough.
Then grow the freak up!
Georgia started the return to normalcy on 4/25. New cases of the virus are dropping. Deaths are declining. Georgia's averages are no worse than the country as a whole. Let's go back to work using some common sense precautions.
I'm all for safety, and common sense.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/13/coronavirus-updates-georgia-tries-to-reopen-economy-during-pandemic.html
New cases in the state appear to have plateaued in recent weeks, increasing by roughly 700 per day since Georgia started reopening on April 24. But due to the disease incubation period and delays in data reporting, a fuller picture of how lifting restrictions affected Covid-19′s spread may not be available until the final days of May, according to Bob Bednarczyk at Emory University and John Drake at the University of Georgia.
So am I. But common sense has been sadly missing since Trump first announced that Codiv-19 was a hoax. Then he said maybe 9 deaths at most would happen in the US. He soon moved that up to 50, and so on as he increasingly lost control of the administration response until the death count is now predicted to be over 100,000. His right-wing sycophants went along with Trump, and still do.Quote:
Originally Posted by talaniman
Now he pushes to "open" the states. He does this for one reason only - he doesn't think he can be re-elected without a recovering economy. He cares not a whit about people dying. Plus he has the side benefit of those pesky immigrants and minorities having a disproportionate rate of dying. Two birds with one stone.
Tal, your description of Trump bothers no one except his supporters. Your words have the added quality of being true and spot on.
A revealing comment against Tal from Mr. Nasty.
An amazing comment from the Insulter-in-Chief on this board who has the Trumpian habit of accusing others of his own failings.Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
How about you start with that, then we can get past stupidQuote:
If you want to be thought of as something beyond an ignorant, vulgar, half-brained dimwit, you probably should try saying something that at least sounds intelligent.
Two words explain your bitterness: Thomas Aquinas. You got caught and you've never gotten over it.Quote:
An amazing comment from the Insulter-in-Chief on this board who has the Trumpian habit of accusing others of his own failings.
Tal became extremely vulgar in some of his comments. It got old, and I don't regret my comment towards him at all. It was tame compared to his. He had it coming. I can handle honest opinions about what I think or say, but that level of elementary school vulgarity is going too far. If I ever sink to that level, you feel free to call me out on it. For me, I've blocked his posts so he can rant and rave all he wants.
A perfect example of why I jumped bluntly dead in your arse. Crass, crude, juvenile, VULGAR! GUILTY! That's all you seem to understand, so that's what you get! No I won't block you, but I will call your personal attacks out. You want an honest intellectual discussion, then be honestly intellectual.Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
I'm sick of your snide personal attacks!
They are why I rarely post now. I got very weary of the putdowns and shaming.Quote:
Originally Posted by talaniman
As usual, in addition to your Mr. Nasty, you avoid the truth which has been provided for you several times now.Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
Speaking of being caught (but afraid to admit it in your own words) is your Mr. Judas.
Like Judas, you have betrayed Christ. You portray Christ as a monster who condemns most of his creation to eternal torture and punishment in an everlasting hell. This is about as far from the message of the Gospels as is possible. This is YOUR scarlet letter which will be with you wherever you go. Which has more scarlet, do you think? Judas would be a good board name for you. I may start using it to replace jl.
You have been brainwashed from birth and have never examined that hell-ish belief. When scholars have shown the mistranslation you so dearly love, you refuse even to read any of the volumes of information now available in the huge library we call the internet. Your fear at the house of cards you have built being in danger of crumbling is an act of cowardice.
You are obviously unaware that there are major differences between English Bible translations. Many do not contain the concept of a hell of eternal punishment. Here are a few of them: Young's Literal, Rotherham's Emphasized, Weymouth's NT in Modern Speech, Concordat Literal NT, 20th Century NT, as well as many more.
No doubt, like many fundamentalists, you consider the King James Version to be God's perfect Bible, ignoring the fact that it was written 1,600 years after Christ walked the earth. Here is a list of Bibles which have taken major steps in correcting many of the corruptions on the KJV.
Some of them are published by leading Evangelical Christian publishers like Baker Book House, Kregal and Eerdman's Publishing. Here's a partial list of some English Bible translations that do NOT contain Hell nor the concept of everlasting punishment: Rotherham's Emphasized Bible (Kregal Publishers), Young's Literal Translation of the Holy Bible (Baker Book House Publishers; Robert Young is author of the famous Young's Concordance), Concordant Literal Translation of the N.T. (Concordant Publishing Concern), Scarlet's New Testament (Nathaniel Scarlett, 1798), The New Testament (Abner Kneeland, 1823) Emphatic Diaglott (Greek/English Interlinear), The New Covenant (J.W. Hanson, 1884), New Testament in Modern Speech (Weymouth, 1910), The Restoration of Original Sacred Name Bible (1976), The Twentieth Century New Testament (1900), The New Testament of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Anointed (James L. Tomanek)1958), The Western New Testament (1926), The New Testament, a Translation (Rev. Edgar Lewis Clementson, 1938), The People's New Testament (Arthur Overbury), The New Testament, A New Translation based upon the Oldest Manuscripts (Johannes Greber, 1980) Jonathan Mitchell New Testament (2009) Far Above All New Testament (2009).
There are other translations like the Companion Bible King James Version, American Standard Version (1901), the Newberry Reference Bible (Still published by Kregal Publications), and the Riverside New Testament by Ballantine (1934) which contain footnotes, marginal readings and appendages which point out that several key Greek and Hebrew words have been MIStranslated by such Bible versions as the King James Bible.”
The idea of Hell is both laughable and horrifying at the same time. It's astounding what we humans can come up with when we give in to our most base fears of punishment and our most envious desires of schadenfreude.
You're the type of person who drools over the idea that you're morally superior to your neighbor, and will be rewarded with Paradise, while your demonstrably more successful neighbor will pay for their most likely well-deserved success by spending eternity in a lake of fire, being repeatedly stabbed in the butt with a pitchfork by some red guy with horns and a tail.
I do not read the KJV. I do read the New American Standard, English Standard Version, the NIV, the NET, and the Amplified (both), all widely known and respected translations which do not hesitate to speak of hell. In fact, Jesus spoke of it frequently. The idea of hell is certainly terrifying. It is certainly NOT laughable.
The "People's New Testament"? Who did that work, Mao? (joke, for the humor impaired) You have selected a group of virtually unknown translations. Try something mainstream. At Biblegateway.com, I looked at the first fifteen or so translations listed alphabetically. Only one rendered it as something other than "hell" in Matthew 5:29. Anyone who wants to can go online and check that out.
And there remains, of course, Matthew 25.
As to the rest of your rant, I have said none of those things, so it would seem that you suffer from the delusion that just because you say something, that makes it true. This is unlike your deceitful episode with Aquinas which you own lock, stock, and barrel. Your explanation had a distinctly hollow ring to it.
If the KJV being written 1600 years after the life of Christ makes it questionable, then why do you accept translations written even longer than that after his life? Why the double standard?
That's been done. Go back and read it again.Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
Even if I agreed with you, which I don't, a distinctly hollow ring is far preferable to the monstrous God you have made Jesus out to be. This God of yours (according to you) made billions of humans just to see them be tortured in hell for all eternity.Quote:
Your (Aquinas) explanation had a distinctly hollow ring to it.
If anyone doubts this, they have only to go back and read your posts on the subject. Even better, why not state it yourself to save everyone the trouble? You won't of course, because all you can offer is an ancient book which was badly translated in parts. As always, you are afraid to put it in your own words since you may then see the absurdity of what you believe.
Or even worse, as I said way back, this sick need of yours to create such a God lies deep within you. You are now officially a CINO (Christian In Name Only).
It is questionable (partially) because much new information on the era of the Bible has come to light for scholars to examine, and that the KJV never had access to.Quote:
If the KJV being written 1600 years after the life of Christ makes it questionable,
There's no double standard. No one claims the newer versions are perfect. The later translations are simply more accurate translations than the KJV. Most scholars will agree with that statement. It's only the fundamentalists who make the KJV something straight from the hand of God.Quote:
then why do you accept translations written even longer than that after his life? Why the double standard?
I wouldn't argue with that. I'm not a fundamentalist so your final sentence does not concern me.Quote:
There's no double standard. No one claims the newer versions are perfect. The later translations are simply more accurate translations than the KJV. Most scholars will agree with that statement. It's only the fundamentalists who make the KJV something straight from the hand of God.
My comment was based upon your statement that the KJV was written 1600 years after the life of Christ and was therefore unreliable. If that is true, then certainly translations written even more distantly than it was would be even less reliable. I don't think that is true, but your logic about the 1600 years is faulty.
You have not cleared up Matthew 25. You are appealing to your extreme minority view of the translation of eternal which is supported by virtually no one of consequence. You are very much on a very small island. You are certainly welcome to your island, but I will not be joining you.
My views are the views of the Bible. I can no more express my views without quoting scripture than you can express your views by quoting scripture. It is not fear but agreement.Quote:
You won't of course, because all you can offer is an ancient book which was badly translated in parts. As always, you are afraid to put it in your own words since you may then see the absurdity of what you believe.
If the Bible is really an "ancient book which was badly translated in parts," then why do you concern yourself with what it says? Why not throw it in the trash can and just move on?
Obviously, I think you are entirely incorrect in your assessment of the accurate transmission of the Bible.
You can call me Judas if it suits you, Aquinas.
Fine with me. Aquinas is a man I greatly admire.Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
Do you admire Judas?
Your ineffective manipulation of Aquinas is a performance I greatly...think deserves to be remembered, and one which would have made Aquinas blush. Words cannot express how glad I am it was not me behind that production.
What is your view of hell? Do you regard it as fictional? Having chosen the name "Athos", that would make sense.
Why do you ask?Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
With what does "Athos" make sense? And why?Quote:
Having chosen the name "Athos", that would make sense.
yawn . my eyes glaze over when I see theological discussions on a political topic with a biased premise .
1968 Somewhere around 120,000 Americans and over 1 million worldwide died of the Hong Kong Flu pandemic . You read histories of the time and if you look hard ,it is a footnote . No one blamed LBJ for his lack of response even though both he and VP Humphrey were stricken by the virus . Many prominent Americans lost their lives . And in the midst of the pandemic although probably in a lull on the outbreak . Almost a half million kids flocked to Max Yasgur's farm and wallowed in the mud without any social separation .
I think it is a particularly cheap shot to blame Trump for the pandemic when a$$-wipes like il duce Cuomo ORDERED c-19 patients to be placed in nursing homes and d*ck heads like Sandinista Bill was encouraging NYers to use the subways and go out on the town ;and refused to shut the city down until there was almost a revolt in the ranks of NYC government late in March with teachers refusing his orders to go to work in the classroom . There are many leaders in this country who got it wrong . And many like Governor DeSantis of Florida who got it right (who governs a larger population and a much larger senior population than NY ) .
There is only one person in the world who can be blamed for this pandemic and that is Xi Jinping the thug genocidal dictator of China .
I think Trump has, all in all, handled this well. It really fits the description of "the fog of war". We don't even have 20/20 vision on it now. Some of the undue alarm comes from the incredibly competitive battles for viewers by the many, many news channels which exist. They have to have something dramatic to talk about. The virus is serious for sure, but I think we will look back a year from now and decide we overreacted, made entirely possible by the "money grows on trees" philosophy now adopted by both parties and most Americans.
oh he is such a freaking saint!!!
Almost did not read the article when the headline said he supports the WHO probe. It was the WHO who rubber stamped China's claims that the virus was not human to human . The WHO is a DISCREDITED agency that needs to be defunded . Free nations can set up an accountable organization to replace it . It is nice Xi wants to spend billions in investment in 3rd world nations that are devastated by the pandamic he inflicted on the world . But mission accomplished .
He saw China was going to take an economic hit when the virus hit ,and he made a deliberate decision to ensure the rest of his economic competitors suffered the same .
Repeal and replace the WHO? Sounds familiar. Destroy and minimize CDC, why not. Get rid of and obstruct any oversight of this tyrant and his regime? May as well change the title to this OP while were at it. Looks like 100, 000 deaths by June easy.
Great job conservatives.
Going to give a hat tip to the great Governors of NY ,NJ where 50% of the deaths came from the same policies as il duce Cuomo's decision was to [FONT=Verdana,Arial,Tahoma,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]unapologetically[/FONT] expose the most vulnerable to the virus by REQUIRING nursing homes to accept C-19 patients . In Connecticut 70% of covid deaths occurred in senior care facilities . 69% of the deaths in PA occurred in senior housing . These are all lib run states .
Here is a comparison between il duce Cuomo's NY and DeSantis Republican led Fla . Fla has a larger population ;is God's waiting room for seniors . And yet the covid deaths of seniors there is not close to NY
https://scontent-lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...0a&oe=5EE6E921
now that pos Cuomo ,fasia brute, has decided that seniors need to be protected . And his solution ? Test the nursing home staff as if they caused the nursing home crisis in this state . He is a despicable turd .
You can be sure that at least a serious attempt will be made to bail out NY, Cally, et al. The dems never seem to pass up a chance to penalize the irresponsible at the expense of the responsible.
Well the clients likely didn't infect themselves, and how else did it get introduced in a nursing home? How else to you protect the elderly but test those they come in contact with?Quote:
Originally Posted by tomder55
That's too true, tal!Quote:
Originally Posted by talaniman
For at least two months, my nursing home friends and the rest of the residents have been quarantined in their rooms -- no exceptions unless an ambulance takes someone away. No family or other visitors are allowed in the building. Any food or other deliveries are left inside the front door to be wiped by a staff member and taken to the resident. Thus, the only people the residents have contact with is the nursing home staff. And testing still isn't being done in all nursing homes.
I already told you Cuomo came out with a directive MARCH 25 ORDERING that elderly C-19 positive patients be sent to nursing homes . The deaths there are on his bloody hands .Quote:
Well the clients likely didn't infect themselves, and how else did it get introduced in a nursing home? How else to you protect the elderly but test those they come in contact with?
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:29 PM. |