Ask Me Help Desk - Like Bill, Hillary feels your pain

Like Bill, Hillary feels your pain

She's just one of us. The poor things were dead broke and in debt when they left the White House.

Quote:

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton defended her high-dollar speaking gigs in a new interview, saying she and former President Bill Clinton needed the money after leaving the White House.“We came out of the White House not only dead broke, but in debt,” she told ABC News in an interview airing Monday night. “We had no money when we got there, and we struggled to, you know, piece together the resources for mortgages, for houses, for Chelsea’s education. You know, it was not easy.”
As in, plural mortgagees and plural houses.

As if we all have multiple houses, mortgages and a $106 million dollar speaking circuit to pay those debts? Sorry, I don't feel your pain.

Funny how it's OK when Palin does it.

Hillary is a huge pain in the rump for everyone. The witch in incapible of feeling pain. You have to have a conscience and a soul to feel pain, she has neither. But she is really good at causing pain for everyone near her.

I've actually met them both...and not in a public setting on camera. Politally I did not like Bill, but he had personality traits that did not make him unlikeable as person.

Hillary is just a flat out shrew....unlikeable in every way. I gave him a free pass for all his extramarital affairs after meeting her.....she must have something on him if he hasn't tossed her along side the road yet.

When Palin does what?

Earning money.

isn't that why she wrote amemoir ,and made the title of it the same as a previous Sec State of a failed Presidency ?
Attachment 46116
Attachment 46117

Then again ....wouldn't the title 'Hard Choices ' be more appropriate for Bubba ?

What does it matter to you?

I have no issue with anyone making money, It’s the hypocrisy.

@NK. Like your questions

Feel free to ignore my posts tickle.

Speech: there's enough hypocrisy on both sides to keep you busy for a millennia.

No doubt, but this thread is about Hillary's hypocrisy. I don't consider anyone "dead broke" that owns multiple multimillion dollar homes and recieved an $8 miilion book advance when she left the White House "dead broke." Do you?

The same rules don't apply to rich liberals as apply to rich conservatives. Being liberal gives them a free pass on EVERYTHING they like to complain about... and anything they never thought to complain about.

Evita is so poor she could only send Chelsea to Stanford , Oxford and Columbia Universities .
Evita is so poor she doesn't have the money to invest in cattle futures for a 1000% profit .
Evita is so poor that all her political offices have been hand me downs .
Evita is so poor that some of her houses don't have ocean views.
Evita is so poor that she had to steal the White House silverware ,china ,and furniture just to furnish one of her homes .

“It’s expensive being a Clinton.”

Quote:

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

“It's expensive being a Clinton.”

And the target of Clinton haters that fear she will be the next president. Your last rich guy lost, maybe our rich girl will too, who you got against her?

Romney successfully run a number of businesses... Evita has done WHAT exactly as an accomplishment to be proud of? Benghazi?

she was able to conceal FBI files in her office.

Evita is poor .... what difference does it make ?

During her postgraduate study, Rodham served as staff attorney for Edelman's newly founded Children's Defense Fund in Cambridge, Massachusetts,[53] and as a consultant to the Carnegie Council on Children.[54] In 1974 she was a member of the impeachment inquiry staff in Washington, D.C. advising the House Committee on the Judiciary during the Watergate scandal.[55]Under the guidance of Chief Counsel John Doar and senior member Bernard Nussbaum,[36] Rodham helped research procedures of impeachment and the historical grounds and standards for impeachment.
There, in February 1977, Rodham joined the venerable Rose Law Firm, a bastion of Arkansan political and economic influence.[71] She specialized in patent infringement and intellectual property law[34] while also working pro bono in child advocacy;[72] she rarely performed litigation work in court.[73]
Rodham maintained her interest in children's law and family policy, publishing the scholarly articles "Children's Policies: Abandonment and Neglect" in 1977[74] and "Children's Rights: A Legal Perspective" in 1979.[75] The latter continued her argument that children's legal competence depended upon their age and other circumstances and that in serious medical rights cases, judicial intervention was sometimes warranted.[51] An American Bar Association chair later said, "Her articles were important, not because they were radically new but because they helped formulate something that had been inchoate."[51] Historian Garry Wills would later describe her as "one of the more important scholar-activists of the last two decades",[76] while conservatives said her theories would usurp traditional parental authority,[77] allow children to file frivolous lawsuits against their parents,[51] and argued that her work was legal "crit" theoryrun amok.[78]In 1977, Rodham cofounded the Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families, a state-level alliance with the Children's Defense Fund.[34][79] Later that year, President Jimmy Carter (for whom Rodham had been the 1976 campaign director of field operations in Indiana)[80] appointed her to the board of directors of the Legal Services Corporation,[81] and she served in that capacity from 1978 until the end of 1981.[82] From mid-1978 to mid-1980,[nb 4] she served as the chair of that board, the first woman to do so.[83] During her time as chair, funding for the Corporation was expanded from $90 million to $300 million; subsequently she successfully fought President Ronald Reagan's attempts to reduce the funding and change the nature of the organization.[72]
Clinton appointed her chair of the Rural Health Advisory Committee the same year,[84] where she secured federal funds to expand medical facilities in Arkansas's poorest areas without affecting doctors' fees.[85]
In 1979, Rodham became the first woman to be made a full partner of Rose Law Firm

You can cut and paste propaganda with the best of them. Problem is like most propaganda... its mostly manure.

I'm sure Bill feels our pain... he actually has to live with that shrew.

Feel free to counter the facts of her employment with facts that show otherwise. If you can't then you are the one full of manure.
Better go back to DC Clothesline for you.

We could compare resumes if you had a candidate. See who had the most manure and propaganda. Democrats everywhere are chomping at the bit for the republican clown circus to hit the fan... again.

Well lets just say I know a dozen people personally that worked inside the Clinton administration (meaning DIRECTLY with them)... and they ALL said she was an arrogant Biotch who bloviated constantly and lied frequently. I've actually personally worked with her once on a project over several days myself so I am in a position of offering my opinion.

You cut and pasted something off the internet. Hmmmmm, I'll call your stuff a steaming pile.

Evita was fired from the Watergate inquiry and her former boss regrets he didn't persue legal action against her for unethical behavior.
And of course she wiggled out of serious charges involving White Water during her time at Rose Law.

Hillary’s resume? Even she can’t think of anything she’s accomplished. But it is amusing watching lefties still whining about rich Republicans while defending this entitled 1 percenter that thinks she was "dead broke."

Naw, the amusement starts when republicans find a better slimeball than democrats.

Quote:

Well lets just say I know a dozen people personally that worked inside the Clinton administration (meaning DIRECTLY with them)

I highly doubt that.

Quote:

I've actually personally worked with her once on a project over several days myself

No you didn't

No one is defending Hillary. She is indeed another one of the 1%, something that we will never achieve. Not sure why you spend so much time on these elites. But she is indeed more accomplished than any one on this board.

Quote:

But she is indeed more accomplished than any one on this board

Yup, she managed to preside over a State Dept that mistranslated a stolen hotel button to “overcharge” Russia, and get a US Ambassador and 3 other Americans killed. But what difference at this point does it make?

Care to prove that I don't?

There are logs that prove I was.

Benghazi is one hell of an accomplishment... I'd rather not aspire to match that disaster... I have higher standards than that.

Quote:

Care to prove that I don't?

Proving a negative? Logic, science and math are not your strong points.

You seem to ace in stupidity... and bloviating about stuff you don't have a clue about.

And you proved how little you do know about a lot right there... because you don't know squat about the work I do and have done. Where I've been and haven't. You probibly believe bigfoot exists and in alien abductions too if you think Hillary has actually accomplished anything of merit in her life.

You seem like an angry little man.

She may be a rose compared to who the republicans nominate and even though you guys know its true, you ignore it to stick to your rock throwing. That's cool for now, but you won't be able to hide behind the "get Hillary" bunker for long, and hope you can duck when its democrats turn to throw rocks at your nominee.

So enjoy your Karl Rove circle jerk while you can. I know you will.

No... you sound like an angry little man that's upset he's had a boring life...in Canada

The Shocking Truth About Alien Abductions (Powerful Video Evidence) | Collective-Evolution

Just like Hillary's "accomplishments" that's on the internet so it must be true as well.

Hillary's "accomplishments" convieniently leave out her being in contempt of court for over 9 months, and her responsibility for the death of Emabasador Stephens and the other three people at Benghazi... those are after all things a liberal should be proud of.

Including her guilt in Whitewater, Travelgate, FIlegate.. haing VIncent Foster killed in Ft Marcy Park... and numerous other crimes.

She makes Al Capone look like a simple tax cheat.

Must we still insult others?

Well smooth, I got the info from Wiki. All the accomplishments have sources ascribed to them. You could easily follow the sources.

But hating all things liberal seems like religious dogma to you so it follows that no facts will change your mind.

Quote:

She may be a rose compared to who the republicans nominate and even though you guys know its true

yeah no doubt the Repubic leadership is hell bent on shooting themselves in the foot . For what it's worth ,I'm on the Scott Walker bandwagon which will guarantee he don't get the nod.
Evita shouldn't feel too confident . If the Dem heir apparent isn't the VP then they typically pick an upstart that comes out of no-where . Recent examples are McGovern ,Carter ,Dukakis ,Bubba Clintoon ,and of course the emperor.
Look for a suprise challenger like Elizabeth Warren from the extreme left to get the nod.

Yeah... its well know wikipedia NEVER EVER makes a mistake, they are absolutely right ALL the time... and they never have a LIBERAL bias to their stuff despite being wholly run by a bunch of liberals...

Try using Wikipedia to back up a single case in any court... and you will get laughed out of the courtroom because only fools believe everything they find in it.

All things liberal are wothj hating because give a liberal their way...and they will ruin anything and everything. Because a libtard lives in a land of fantasy....where reality and the law of physics don't exist.

Quote:

Try using Wikipedia to back up a single case in any court.

Is this something you would do? LOL! We're not in court here. Just follow sources links or find the source documentation. Surely not everyone has set up fake pages on known sites to conspire against you.