Ask Me Help Desk

Ask Me Help Desk (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forum.php)
-   Current Events (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forumdisplay.php?f=486)
-   -   It's come to this 2.1 (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/showthread.php?t=777098)

  • Nov 30, 2013, 06:58 AM
    speechlesstx
    It's come to this 2.1
    The People's Republic of NYC may ban vaping because it looks bad.

    New York City May Ban Vaping Because It Looks Like Smoking - Hit & Run : Reason.com

    I can't imagine there is anything more pressing than preventing people from enjoying a safe alternative to cigarettes, can you?
  • Nov 30, 2013, 02:46 PM
    tomder55
    Doesn't surprise me at all. de Blasio is nanny Bloomy on steroids . He will continue all of Bloomy's ban and add some off the wall ones on his own. Coming soon ;a ban on horse drawn carriages in Central Park in the name of animal rights.
  • Nov 30, 2013, 03:46 PM
    paraclete
    can't see the point of banning something that does away with cigarette smoke, unless the tobacco companies support your campaign. do they also ban candy cigarettes?
  • Nov 30, 2013, 03:53 PM
    paraclete
    It's unsafe to knit

    Surely this is first for any nanny state?

    Knitting nannas in court over purler of a protest against logging at Mount St Leonard

    peaceful protesters charged over the disturbance of knitting
  • Nov 30, 2013, 04:01 PM
    tomder55
    these vapor cigs were invented to wean people off tobacco.What happened instead is that they are hooking a new generation on tobacco because they are cool and flavored .Also people can use them undetected indoors so it's become a trend for smokers to take the smokeless ones into bars ,concerts etc.

    And of course the pot crowd have discovered vaporizers for pot too. They are expensive ....the Pax vaporizer goes for about $250 . Since the user doesn't inhale some of the toxins inherent in smoke inhalation ,it's probably a positive development over the alternatives.
  • Nov 30, 2013, 04:07 PM
    tomder55
    I guess they weren't using wood chairs . What's wrong with responsible logging ?
  • Nov 30, 2013, 05:19 PM
    paraclete
    The question is when is it responsible? these protests are about old growth forests, pristine areas, noone protests about plantation forest harvesting, just about destruction of old growth forest to establish plantations; it's a hardwood v softwood debate
  • Nov 30, 2013, 06:14 PM
    speechlesstx
    The whole point of this thread besides the silliness of the world around us is to protest AMHD allowing the last thread to exceed their limits and making over 100 posts to disappear.
  • Nov 30, 2013, 06:32 PM
    tomder55
    much better to keep the old growth forest "pristine " until nature does it's thing and burns it down.
  • Nov 30, 2013, 10:04 PM
    paraclete
    Don't be a cynic Tom, we love our old growth forest and don't want multinational timber companies profiting from them any more than we want multinational agribusiness profiting from our wheat crop.
    We have the will to defy multinationalism!
  • Dec 1, 2013, 02:40 AM
    tomder55
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    The whole point of this thread besides the silliness of the world around us is to protest AMHD allowing the last thread to exceed their limits and making over 100 posts to disappear.

    yes what happened to it ?
  • Dec 1, 2013, 04:00 AM
    paraclete
    It disappeared
  • Dec 1, 2013, 04:05 AM
    tomder55
    along with all the contributions by the members ? Ridiculous !! Many of the comments were supported by research requiring a significant amount of the contributor's time .
  • Dec 1, 2013, 05:21 AM
    paraclete
    Don't weep Tom we all get ignored some of the time
  • Dec 1, 2013, 05:44 AM
    NeedKarma
    Not much of value was lost. It's gets repetitive.
  • Dec 1, 2013, 05:46 AM
    speechlesstx
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by NeedKarma View Post
    Not much of value was lost. It's gets repetitive.

    Thank you for your always thoughtful responses.
  • Dec 1, 2013, 06:02 AM
    NeedKarma
    No problems. That was a good example. :-)
  • Dec 1, 2013, 06:43 AM
    speechlesstx
    As always, a fountain of information dispensed with humility.
  • Dec 1, 2013, 07:44 AM
    tomder55
    NK of course was speaking about his own contributions .
  • Dec 1, 2013, 08:08 AM
    NeedKarma
    Of course.
    Hey, how come you guys never post on the Politics board?
  • Dec 1, 2013, 08:44 AM
    speechlesstx
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    NK of course was speaking about his own contributions .

    I'm not allowed to say such things. Apparently everyone here is free to hurl insults and provoke while I shut up and behave. Oops, there I go again. I feel an infraction coming.
  • Dec 1, 2013, 10:14 AM
    NeedKarma
    :p
  • Dec 1, 2013, 10:21 AM
    speechlesstx
    Thank you for your always thoughtful responses.
  • Dec 1, 2013, 12:12 PM
    NeedKarma
    You're welcome again. Bless you.
  • Dec 1, 2013, 01:53 PM
    paraclete
    Do you think this is why that thread no longer exists
  • Dec 1, 2013, 03:25 PM
    tomder55
    I don't care what the cause was .... there were multiple contributors to the op and their work should not just disappear .
  • Dec 1, 2013, 03:27 PM
    speechlesstx
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by paraclete View Post
    Do you think this is why that thread no longer exists

    No, it exceeded their 1500 post limit. What I don't get is why days after they closed it they shaved off the extra posts they allowed or why certain people are allowed more latitude than others.
  • Dec 1, 2013, 05:11 PM
    paraclete
    Quote:

    I don't care what the cause was .... there were multiple contributors to the op and their work should not just disappear .
    Let's face it you can't take being dissed. I contributed, can't really remember what, and it's all history now anyway, it was good for a laugh at the time and time to move on to what is happening today.

    There is import news they are banning drop bears in Australia, the big white ones in Bundie ads anyway
  • Dec 1, 2013, 05:43 PM
    speechlesstx
    Nah, I can take being dissed. I despise separate rules.
  • Dec 1, 2013, 06:22 PM
    speechlesstx
    Ok, back to the thread.

    'Humans evolved after a female chimpanzee mated with a pig': Extraordinary claim made by American geneticist | Mail Online
  • Dec 1, 2013, 07:43 PM
    paraclete
    Now I can see how some people might think that, so it's not evolution, but hybridation followed by adaptation. Something has to be recognised, all creatures on Earth have a certain amout of common DNA, this is one reason why evolution is thought to exist. What we have here is an example of why it doesn't exist. Pigs, didn't evolve into men, Chimpanzee's didn't evolve into men and I strongly suspect that a oneoff animal hybrid, which was likely to be a mule, didn't either. The hyphophis being put forward here is that pigs and chimps were frequently interacting. If anyone has seen film of chimp society they will know there is a great deal of violence and the possibility of a hybrid infant surviving highly unlikely
  • Dec 3, 2013, 07:22 AM
    speechlesstx
    1 Attachment(s)
    It's come to this, the regime has labeled its young supporters WHYouth. Creepy.

    Quote:

    At 8pm ET, join @KalPenn, @HealthCareTara & @YI_Care for a Hangout on young people & #Obamacare. Ask Qs w/ #WHYouth: http://go.wh.gov/AZjAxB
    2:53 PM - 2 Dec 2013
    Ben Shaprio reacts:
  • Dec 3, 2013, 11:58 AM
    speechlesstx
    Naturally, mocking ensues after the #WHYouth hashtag. It was a typo, shuold have been #WHJugend according to Charles C.W.Cooke.
  • Dec 4, 2013, 09:22 AM
    speechlesstx
    Perhaps this is why Obama is going after #WHYouth, he's lost young adults.

    http://cdn-media.nationaljournal.com...4444&width=300
  • Dec 4, 2013, 09:34 AM
    talaniman
    Obamas numbers are bad but yours are not that good either.

    Republican approval rating falls to lowest point in Gallup poll history - Politicssource
  • Dec 4, 2013, 11:07 AM
    speechlesstx
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    Obamas numbers are bad but yours are not that good either.

    Republican approval rating falls to lowest point in Gallup poll history - Politicssource

    You give me spin from a 2 month old poll? Congress' approval is lower than a salesman, and that includes Democrats.
  • Dec 4, 2013, 01:02 PM
    paraclete
    well those numbers arn't too bad for a supposedly unpopular president, the swinging vote has swung once again
  • Dec 4, 2013, 02:01 PM
    speechlesstx
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by paraclete View Post
    well those numbers arn't too bad for a supposedly unpopular president, the swinging vote has swung once again

    His ratings are lower than Bush's at this point.
  • Dec 4, 2013, 02:04 PM
    paraclete
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    His ratings are lower than Bush's at this point.

    It is only important in relation to the upcoming midterm election
  • Dec 4, 2013, 02:10 PM
    Tuttyd
    edit

  • All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:43 PM.