:D It's true!
|
:D It's true!
Romney sure has some dumb supporters
We've heard every single one of her "beliefs" on this site.
See, the difference between your video and the one I posted is that the right-wingers here at AMHD actually say the stuff she says, whereas none of the liberals here advocate anything that shown in your video. That was the point of my post.
Perhaps you should look a little closer.
How much closer would you like to look
Body Language Expert Says Romney Uncomfortable Firing Big Bird - ABC News
He gave Obama a comeback line on a silver platter.. if Obama wasn't so disinterested ,if he didn't think the process was so beneath him ,he would've seized the opportunity .
And by the way.. Big Bird would be better off privatized .
So says the capitalist but privatised Big Bird wouldn't exist
At what? Why so obscure??Quote:
Originally Posted by speechlesstx
Any number of capitalists would compete for the rights to the Big Bird franchise . Same is true with any PBS programing that is popular .Quote:
Originally Posted by paraclete
If that were so why hasn't there been more knockoffs over the years. Jim Henson did well out of it but you haven't had the true kids focus, ''cause you can't ,make money out of kids educational shows.
Come on Tom your bias is showing you don't think anything should be done for the public good, just for the profit
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomder55
Yes, call it Wall Street instead of Sesame Street. Barkley the dog could be the head of Standard and Paws.
Tut
If these videos represents 'the average voter' then you obviously need to expand the PBS. Expand it into something that at least can disseminate political commentary with some semblance of accuracy.
It is obvious that the people on both sides have been mislead.
.
I like it ! A lot of the problems in this country is that kids are not taught personal money management . Many people here can't manage the simple task of balancing a check book ,let alone some of the more complex transactions .Quote:
Originally Posted by TUT317
Why, you don't know what you said?Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedKarma
Are you like this in real life? With your wife, kids and co-workers?Quote:
Originally Posted by speechlesstx
Captain Kangaroo made money for CBS for nearly 30 years.Quote:
Originally Posted by paraclete
Hello:
In the days BEFORE Hannity, the Limp one, and angry right wing talk radio, people like this existed only on the fringe. Now, 47% of the country have fallen prey.
We'll NEVER get them to take responsibility for their country.
excon
Whatever do you mean?Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedKarma
Quote:
Originally Posted by excon
Hi Ex,
If this is true then it points to two possibilities. Either people are getting their information from a single source or the same information is being disseminated by multiple sources. I tend to think the latter. You would also have to wonder why the lack of quality.
Tut
Hello TUT:Quote:
Originally Posted by TUT317
Because quality people would NEVER fall for racist, red neck, right wing clap trap.
excon
It must be that left-wing liberal indoctrination education... oh wait...
That one lady is not a representative example of the majority of conservatives. NK's proposition that the conservatives here are just like her is false as is ex's "47 percent" remark. It's just a game the left loves to play, portray the right as (fill in the blank) racist, loony, extremist, bitter clinger, woman hating, and on and on and on.Quote:
Originally Posted by TUT317
We saw it with the Tea Party, we saw it the "dominionist" conspiracy theory last year, the mythical "war on women", Bush's coming theocracy, etc. And these come right from mainstream liberals and media figures. Occasionally they even admit it's all just a tactic...
Liberal super PAC: Calling Republicans racist more effective than criticizing policy
Come on Tut, if we can't even say the word "golf" without being accused of sending out dog whistles you really can't take this thread seriously can you?
Quote:
Originally Posted by excon
I think the lady in the video feels as though she is under siege from the left. In reality she is probably fighting two battles. The first battle is the ideological battle. The second battle is what we could term actual social, political and economic issue of the day. The nuts and bolts issues you could say.
The trap is to think that by tackling the ideological issues the nuts and bolts issues will automatically be taken care of. To my knowledge this has never been successful in any country, and at any time in history.
Tut
Quote:
Originally Posted by speechlesstx
Yes, I agree with that... See my comment above.
.
Quote:
Originally Posted by speechlesstx
Hello Tut:Quote:
Originally Posted by TUT317
I agree. So does Steve.. It's really just a matter of the numbers, then.. Steve thinks 47% is too high. He's right. I made it up. The REAL number is around 40%.
excon
Maybe if I had said that but I didn't. As stated several times in this thread I stated that we've heard every one of her talking points on this website from several different people (which is true), she just pulls it all together in one person and one video.Quote:
Originally Posted by speechlesstx
Yes, policy doesn't move voters. I assume in this case it means motivating people to go out and vote.Quote:
Originally Posted by speechlesstx
Portraying policy as an ideological battle is more likely to motivate people to get out and vote. It then becomes a contest as to who can create the biggest siege mentality and thus have the greater success at motivating their constituency.
Tut
Well put, that seem to be exactly what is happening. Not sure how it can be curtailed and returned to policy/facts.Quote:
Originally Posted by TUT317
The title of your thread is "All AMHD right-wingers talking points in one video." The claim I asked you to examine closer that you couldn't seem to discern was this:Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedKarma
Yes, you did say that.Quote:
See, the difference between your video and the one I posted is that the right-wingers here at AMHD actually say the stuff she says, whereas none of the liberals here advocate anything that shown in your video. That was the point of my post.
Yes, and I meant it.Quote:
Originally Posted by speechlesstx
And so Romney's constituency is represented by this woman? Back to square one.Quote:
Originally Posted by TUT317
I think he was looking at the bigger picture, not just a single person, nor a single party.Quote:
Originally Posted by speechlesstx
What exactly is the point of this thread?Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedKarma
You seem confused today. You can start from the top again. :-)Quote:
Originally Posted by speechlesstx
What is the point of any thread in the Current Events forum?
Confused? I'm not the one that couldn't remember what I said.Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedKarma
This site is doing funny things. LOL
Anyway, what was the answer to "Perhaps you should look a little closer?" - I don't think you ever answered that.
I haven't noticed any problems with the site.Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedKarma
The whole point of that response was for you to re-examine what you had just said in light of reality.
All right I'll bite: show me where I'm advocated putting a cap on corporate profits.Quote:
Originally Posted by speechlesstx
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:18 AM. |