Ask Me Help Desk - The BACK DOOR approach to taking away your contraceptives..

The BACK DOOR approach to taking away your contraceptives..

Hello:

Didja hear?? Romney is gonna appoint somebody like BORK to the Supreme Court? There goes your contraceptives, among other hard fought for rights...

excon

Where exactly does it say Romney is going to appoint someone like Bork and take away your contraceptives?

Quote:

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

Where exactly does it say Romney is going to appoint someone like Bork and take away your contraceptives?

Hello again, Steve:

I don't know about you, but a skilled political operative like myself CAN connect the dots.. He DID appoint Bork to be a senior legal adviser. I presume it's because of his views. You probably think he's just a good lunch partner..

Bwa, ha ha ha.

excon

Ah, so like NK you like to argue from a lack of evidence. Smart. Very smart.

Quote:

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

Ah, so like NK you like to argue from a lack of evidence.

Hello again, Steve:

So, you DO think he's along just for luncheon conversation... Bwa, ha ha ha.

excon

Remember excon - only THEY can connect the dots in their threads. Any non-conservative must be ridiculed for doing the same thing.

Quote:

Originally Posted by NeedKarma

Remember excon - only THEY can connect the dots in their threads. Any non-conservative must be ridiculed for doing the same thing.

Not at all, I just won't waste my time trying to connect your nonexistent dots. Or ex's for that matter, it's a huge leap from Bork being a campaign adviser to a "back door approach to taking away your contraceptives" and Romney nominating a guy like Bork. If I had made that leap I feel quite confident your answer would have been something like mine, where did the article say that?

Not only that, but we're expected to avoid daring to connect any dots from Obama to anyone or virtually anything, such as the Solyndra boondoggle or Bill Ayers. You guys made the rules, don't get upset that I'm playing by them.

Quote:

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

You guys made the rules, don't get upset that I'm playing by them.

Hello again, Steve:

You adopt mine. I'll adopt yours. Works for me.

Didn't you say that making Van Jones a czar PROVES Obama is a commie? I ain't going to look, but I'll bet you did.

excon

Quote:

Originally Posted by excon

Hello again, Steve:

You adopt mine. I'll adopt yours. Works for me.

Didn't you say that making Van Jones a czar PROVES Obama is a commie?? I ain't gonna look, but I'll bet you did.

excon

Actually I called Van Jones a "racist, socialist, radical of an idiot" and along with his other pals like Jeremiah Wright and Ayers alluded to Obama's "radical leanings." But I don't believe I've ever called Obama a commie.

That's funny... now Romney is being Borked .

I think Romney is being Romneyed - he's doing it to himself LOL!

Quote:

Originally Posted by NeedKarma

I think Romney is being Romneyed - he's doing it to himself LOL!

Seems quite plain that ex is doing the Borking here. What is this aversion you seem to have to actual evidence?

I was offering my opinion. Is that OK?

Quote:

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

Seems quite plain that ex is doing the Borking here. What is this aversion you seem to have to actual evidence?

Hello again, Steve:

Ok, I guess you didn't like my luncheon idea. Let me see. Bork is a legal adviser to Romney. Although I don't have EVIDENCE, I can presume that he's advising him on legal positions. I can further presume that those positions ARE HIS positions, which are widely known.

Now, it's true, Romney doesn't have to listen to Bork.. He COULD dismiss him from his campaign... But, he hasn't... You wonder why. I don't.

excon

Bork thought the Griswold decision was wrong... BUT ,thought the law banning contraceptives was "nutty" .

Just waiting for you to find some actual dots to connect.

Quote:

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

Just waiting for you to find some actual dots to connect.

Hello again, Steve:

Like your hitters, you wouldn't know a dot if I lobbed one in at 74 MPH.

excon

PS> NK's going to LOVE this.

1 Attachment(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by excon

Hello again, Steve:

Like your hitters, you wouldn't know a dot if I lobbed one in at 74 MPH.

excon

PS> NK's gonna LOVE this.

I'm going to love it too. I guess you haven't checked my batters lately. Bwa ha ha ha!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by excon

PS> NK's gonna LOVE this.

http://www.rising-dead.com/forums/im...con_e_wink.gif

At the end of the day it's only a website that the same 6 people see every day.

Actually there are 5 of us. Its fun, like having breakfast together. Right, left, and the middle.

I'm having breakfast on my own I think I'll have borkin and egg

borkin?

Quote:

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

borkin?

G'day, Mate:

Borkin is Australian for bacon.

excon

I would hope so.

No Ex is wrong I was speaking kiwi at the time

You were speaking pretty good English except for 'borkin.'

Quote:

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

You were speaking pretty good English except for 'borkin.'

Hey it's a joke, have you no sense of humour

Bork Rinds... ok, I tried.

Quote:

Originally Posted by FirstChair

Bork Rinds...ok, I tried.

Look the kiwi has a speech impediment

So borkin and aigs, fush and chups, newspapers come from a dairy, you really don't want to know more

Quote:

Originally Posted by paraclete

Hey its a joke, have you no sense of humour

Don't accuse me of being a liberal, I have a great sense of humor. Just a communication barrier, we have those here, too.

Quote:

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

Don't accuse me of being a liberal, I have a great sense of humor. Just a communication barrier, we have those here, too.

Yes I've noticed

Hello again,

This video about sums it up. Republican women speak.

excon

PS> Ok, maybe they're not Republicans..

I want the Democrats to stop using my womanhood for their mostly liberal propaganda and then obessing over my vagina. I want the Republicans to stop giving the Democrats reasons to be delusional because they think Republicans are trying to control my vagina.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxch-...layer_embedded

Personally not interested in taking the debate to this level

The whole issue is a phony canard. Republicans held the Presidency for 20 of the last 32 years ,including 2 terms each of the 2 conservative Republicans . They also had control of the House of Representatives for a decade until 2006... and again in the current session of Congress. In all that time ,not once was there a move by either executive action ,or legislation that threatened the availabiltiy of contraceptions .
Now we are to believe that a moderate former Governor of Mass. Is more conservative than Goldwater (in Obama's words ),and that contraception availability is threatened . The truth is that the only changes proposed are by the radical POTUS and his Commisars who now think that contracpetion should not only be a "right " ,but also a "free" entitlement .

As I said ,it is a canard and a diversion . The President doesn't want us to dwell on the fact that the labor participation rate is the lowest it has been in the last 30 years .

Canard isn't that some sort of duck, you know quacks like, waddles like, etc and that's the way I see this argument

Quote:

Originally Posted by tomder55

The whole issue is a phony canard. Republicans held the Presidency for 20 of the last 32 years ,including 2 terms each of the 2 conservative Republicans . They also had control of the House of Representatives for a decade until 2006 ...and again in the current session of Congress. In all that time ,not once was there a move by either executive action ,or legislation that threatened the availabiltiy of contraceptions .
Now we are to believe that a moderate former Governor of Mass. is more conservative than Goldwater (in Obama's words ),and that contraception availability is threatened . The truth is that the only changes proposed are by the radical POTUS and his Commisars who now think that contracpetion should not only be a "right " ,but also a "free" entitlement .

As I said ,it is a canard and a diversion . The President doesn't want us to dwell on the fact that the labor participation rate is the lowest it has been in the last 30 years .

But now all of a sudden there is a big push, both state and congress to go backward. What happened? Oh that's right, the job creators saw a democrat coming to clean up the mess so they hid the mop, broom, and bucket, and robbed the piggy bank blind, and blamed the new guy, and told the cops he went that away. Said it best, Mitts only job is to keep the pen hand loose and just sign where they tell him too!

Everybody signs what Grover says to sign. Mitt doesn't care, he gets paid handsomely for it.

I'm just laughing because the left won't be all Grover and Karl screw over, the right will be as poor as the left, that is if they do what the big boys want. They have already won the class war, so it's a sweat shop or nothing for the rest of us, you too Tom.

You can explain to us over peanut butter and beans how Mitt saved the world. Naw cancel that, I'll be marching to Washington, want me to pick you up on the way? Have your own gas money though!

Romney is on theme, jobs ,pro -growth and Federal finances.Hopefully he'll add flat taxes . Obama is left to defend the undefendable ;blame shift ,trash talk, and concoct phony fringe issues.

I guess he can take heart in the fact that Sarko lost to the commie Hollande in France today. Why go into austerity when there are still German Euros to spend ?

Why is anyone talking about vaginas? Why not prostates? This is the silliest election cycle I think I've ever seen.

Quote:

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

Why is anyone talking about vaginas? Why not prostates?

Hello again, Steve:

I don't know how you missed it, but right wing states are passing LAWS that require a foreign object be put all UP INSIDE the vaginas of women who are seeking a legal abortion.. They're NOT passing laws about prostates..

excon