With 48 states requiring auto insurance, why is mandatory health insurance catching so much flak? Thoughts?
|
With 48 states requiring auto insurance, why is mandatory health insurance catching so much flak? Thoughts?
Last time I looked 50 states required mandatory insurance.
You should have posted this in the current events category.
The OP is right, only 48 states (and Wash DC) require auto insurance...
This thread was moved to a discussion forum.
Because there is a big difference between the 2 insurances.Mandatory medical insurance is requiring one to insure themselves . Auto insurance requires one to insure for the damage one does to someone else. The part of auto insurance that covers oneself is optional.
The other big difference is that there is nothing that compels one to drive a car.
Thanks for the input Tom
No problem ;I'm sure there are others on this board who have opposing views . The reason the issue of mandatory medical insurance is raised is because the government would like to compel the insurance companies to cover everyone regardless of their condition. The insurance companies correctly argue that to do that they need healthy customers to offset the expenses... or prohibitively raise fees.
Since many of the "uninsured " are the young and healthy people who have calculated the risk of not having medical insurance doesn't justify the cost of obtaining it; and they have better use for the money ,the money of these young and healthy adults are not available to offset the costs of bringing into the pool the people who are ill they would be required to add.
Therefore the only way to bring these young and healthy adults would be to compel them to pay for insurance.
It really is the same rational behind the so called Social Security Insurance. The young people who are starting in life ,trying to provide for their families are required to shell out of their paychecks funds to provide (inadequately ) for the retirement of the generation before them . In return there is a vague promise that when they are retirement age the money from the yonger population will provide for them . This is nothing more than a wealth transfer and a ponzi scheme .
If you look at the long term prospectus of both Social Security and Medicare (the current government run health care system) you see that both are underfunded for future "entitlement" liabilities.
That is the real reason why the government wants more people in the government run pool. They need to tap into greater resources to pay for the systems they have concocted .
Tom, I have an opposing view, I hope to hear from different view points.
Here's another view: every other developed country has universal health care except the US. The US politicians seem to be more concerned about the health of the insurance companies versus the health of the people in their country.
My 82 Toyota pickup has some pre-existing conditions, suppose I could get Farmers Insurance to cover the damage?
speechlesstx, do you really compare a truck to humans? Tom, what is civilization if the young and healthy don't care for the sick and old, We would be no different than animals.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedKarma
Thanks NK
Why do we think we know the best way over the rest of the world?
parttime, I wasn't the one that started this by comparing mandatory health insurance with mandatory car insurance now was I?
Your politicians (I'm Canadian) are protecting the interests of the corporations that line their pockets.Quote:
Originally Posted by parttime
Interesting question. I agree but am vehemently opposed to the government compelling me the be charitable. Where is the virtue in my giving if I am forced to do so ?Quote:
Tom, what is civilization if the young and healthy don't care for the sick and old, We would be no different than animals.
Throughout history humans answered your question by providing intergenerational care for their families . There was no government compulsion to do so.
So if now it takes a government mandate to compel us to take care of our parents what does it say about our evolution ? Perhaps we really are no different than animals.
Quote:
Originally Posted by speechlesstx
Touche' (spelling?)
It's weird the mindthink that occurs, people in universal healthcare countries view their taxation for healthcare as contributing to their own plan, not to others, because that's exactly what it is.
If it's only a matter of insuring myself I have coverage for myself and my family already. But it isn't really about that is it ?
You're one of the lucky ones. Have a gander at the Health and Wellness forums on this site. Maybe you can help there.
Tom you know, what ancient man did for there sick and old, carry food and water, shelter, defense right to burying the remains. They in essences did what ever it takes, maybe it's the time that health care is what it takes? Do we stand like man of old and do what is necessary or do we continue to slide the other way?Quote:
Originally Posted by tomder55
The vast majority of the American people are also the lucky ones . What is being discussed is a fundamental reorganization of a large percent of the American economy into a controlled economy to satisfy the ones who fall through the nannystate gaps.Quote:
You're one of the lucky ones. Have a gander at the Health and Wellness forums on this site. Maybe you can help there.
Those who lament that the so called reform is stalled have no one to blame but the Democrats over-reach. Had they proposed common sense modest tweeking of the system that also addressed some of the concerns of the minority party they could've done something useful .
Instead ,what they continue to insist upon is a system the United States people reject.
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:59 AM. |