He's not mad (you haven't ever seen him mad) -- and he's not wrong either. The threat of long-term or future health problems, especially with heart and lungs, are the clouds hanging over the heads of those young people who survive COVID-19.
![]() |
Yeah. There's always the threat of the unknown. Same thing is true of driving cars. 40,000 dead a year, and countless injuries, and yet there is no call to do away with cars. At any rate, you still have not said what should be done other than what is being done now. The Trump vaccine is the great hope at this point. I don't know of anything else other than vitamin C and other very marginally effective ideas. The Trump vaccine is the only path forward.
Yes, get rid of gasoline-powered cars (and thus preserve our environment and air quality) by the use of electric cars and smart cars.
Numbers 3 and 4 are not part of the general conversation so far. Even you apparently don't follow those very helpful guidelines.Quote:
At any rate, you still have not said what should be done other than what is being done now.
Trump doesn't believe the virus is that big a deal and has nothing to do with any vaccine development except maybe saying, "Yeah, sure. Go ahead. Have fun playing with those chemicals."Quote:
The Trump vaccine is the great hope at this point.
Still. No answers. Oh well.
So your scheme to go electric would not solve the highway deaths problem. What would it cost? Prediction: You have no idea.
That reading comprehension problem pops up yet again....
Reduce the speed limit. Have periodic driver written and road tests for licensed drivers. If we stop spending millions of dollars on oil drilling e.g., we could put that money into manufacturing low-cost electric cars.Quote:
So your scheme to go electric would not solve the highway deaths problem. What would it cost? Prediction: You have no idea.
The weak as water excuse making shows up again. Poor WG. She can't make her case, so it has to be someone else's fault.Quote:
That reading comprehension problem pops up yet again....
So the cost of electric cars is bigger government and less freedom? No thanks.
What you forget is electric cars have to be powered by electricity, solar cells don't work at night so the renewables cycle doesn't sync therefore the options are nuclear or fossil fueled and the lithium battery industry is a serious pollutant, given there is enough lithium to produce all those batteries, it is another liberal pipe dream
Absolutely well said.Quote:
What you forget is electric cars have to be powered by electricity, solar cells don't work at night so the renewables cycle doesn't sync therefore the options are nuclear or fossil fueled and the lithium battery industry is a serious pollutant, given there is enough lithium to produce all those batteries, it is another liberal pipe dream
Why should I get mad? You presented ratios not data, factors without the actual numbers. Very interesting but incomplete. If you have those real numbers with age breakdowns I would love to see it.
I would never get mad when I intend to chunk a rock...it ruins my accuracy.
You have no idea how ridiculous that statement is, do you? But to make you happy, feast your eyes.Quote:
ratios not data,
Age Group Percentage Count 0 - 4 Years <0.1 48 5 - 17 Years 0.1 108 18 - 29 Years 0.5 1,063 30 - 39 Years 1.3 2,573 40 - 49 Years 3 6,034 50 - 64 Years 14.8 29,791 65 - 74 Years 20.8 41,795 75 - 84 Years 27 54,159 85+ Years 32.5 65,148
https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#demographics
Happy now? Over 85% of deaths were 65 or above. Stay safe, Tal.
Do the math. That's still a lot of young people. SO FAR.
Yeah. 0-30 it's about 6/10 of 1 percent. Now every life is important, but a person would have to be stupid beyond belief to not see that the big, big risk is 65 and above, and the below 50 group has much, much, much, much, much less risk. And that is exactly the point that you decided must surely be wrong.
Yeah. I'll be sure to do that.
Be safe JL, you and your family. I know how I would feel if my kids were part of that 3%. One mans statistic is another devastation.
This is paraphrased from Forbes, a right-leaning publication, showing that electric vehicles are far better for the environment than internal combustion vehicles.
The stark difference in emissions between electric vehicles and internal combustion vehicles over the course of their lifetimes is tremendous. With no combustion and complete lack of tailpipe emissions, electric vehicles produce the bulk of their emissions through their manufacturing process and the sourcing of their energy including the use of rare earths, giving them an advantage over petrol and diesel-powered cars.
As electric vehicles become more common and manufacturing becomes more widespread, battery recycling will be more efficient and reduce the need to extract new materials, therefore lessening the reliance on mining and production of new batteries.
The total impact of electric vehicles is more pronounced when looking at their complete lifetime, where combustion engine vehicles are unable to compete. Electric vehicles are responsible for considerably lower emissions over their lifetime than vehicles running on fossil fuels regardless of the source of their electricity.
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:06 PM. |