What's ridiculous is attempting to assign positions to me based on someone else's behavior.Quote:
Originally Posted by talaniman
|
What's ridiculous is attempting to assign positions to me based on someone else's behavior.Quote:
Originally Posted by talaniman
That plan isn't necessary Tom it is already in play. Celebrities along with the rest of you have said yes to the plan that you should @#$%yourselves every day. You endorse gun violence, you say they will never take my gun away, what part of cause and effect do you not understand?
Don't be ridiculous .I support gun ownership ;not gun violence. Nor do I glorify it while getting on my platform demanding everyone (except my personal body guard ) surrender their guns.
So you have a personal bodyguard, how is that working out for you? A great waste of money no doubt. I don't need a personal bodyguard because certain weapons are prescribed, and as a result gun violence is confined to the criminal classes who take great delight in slaughtering each other
We have not had a political assassination attempt in this country in many decades
Try to keep up .I was talking about the hypocrite Hollywierd crowd.Quote:
so you have a personal bodyguard, how is that working out for you?
You really need to let me know when you're in sarcasm mode. Celebrities have bodyguards for reasons other than violent attack by members of the gun toting public
The ban is for army guns and the clips over 10 shots to the general public. You will still have more than enough guns for fun, and personal protection.
Indeed but let's hope no more massacres
That may or may not be the ban. Biden hasn't convened yet .FrankenFeinstein and Andrew Cuomo are talking confiscation.
Confiscation it is then
Good luck with that
It is your people who are proposing it, I guess the fiscal cliff must have brought reason in other areas
Who is "your people " ? Feinstein and Cuomo are Dems .
No Tom americans, you remember them, the other 47%
Thought I would drop this here.
Assault Rifle vs. Sporting Rifle - YouTube
Thank's dad that video proves why semi-automatic weapons should be banned, not just high load magazines but the weapon itsself. There is no reason why you need to fire multiple shots in that manner. It was demonstrated that you could fire 80 shots a minute.Quote:
Originally Posted by califdadof3
If you have a sporting rifle with a small load magazine you don't need more fire power.
The video also demonstrated a case for recall of all large load magazines in the community
Big difference between urban and rural. I see no function for either rifles in a city.
Well you do have sporting shooters in a city, but your case is well made, they are undoubtedly a minority, depending upon what your regard as sport, no doubt the gang gbangers think it is sport to do a drive by. The most recent shooting just shows the whole thing is out of hand and sporting shooters should see that the responsible action is to get on side with the community and do what it takes to make everyone safe. So what if they are a little inconvienced, having to reload their magazine more often. No one should have high load magazines or be allowed more than one magazine on their person. It isn't just automatic fire that makes a weapon the equivalent of a military weapon, it is calibre, rapid fire, and the ability to put a lot of shots on a target.
You can't see why someone like a judge that's put hundreds of people behind bars that just got outed on a map for being a registered gun owner by an irresponsible newspaper with an agenda might need an AR-15 or better, a shotgun for protection? Or how about that battered woman that finally got away whose name and address just went public? Naw, you can never see a need for anything like that eh?Quote:
Originally Posted by talaniman
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:40 AM. |