Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NeedKarma

What you call "Current Events" is usually related to trolling your conservative sites and digging up something you can post that makes fun of liberals - <yawn> It's just constant whining about what's wrong with your country. I'm kind of proud that Canadians on this board don't feel a need to do that.

---

I'm no troll. You go check the huge variety of sources we use and then come back and insult us about something else.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wondergirl

We're not at war.

---

Are we at War in Afphanistan and Iraq? Libya did less to us in recent decades than either of those two. I consider them much the same... only two are further along than the other.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

I'm no troll. You go check the huge variety of sources we use and then come back and insult us about something else.

---

Never said you were a troll, just a one trick pony.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NeedKarma

Never said you were a troll, just a one trick pony.

---

Pot meet kettle.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smoothy

Are we at War in Afphanistan and Iraq?

---

Did Congress declare war in either country?

Yes in both cases .

But we aren't at war with Libya.

Are we bombing Libya? Yes. Sounds like war to me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

Are we bombing Libya? Yes. Sounds like war to me.

---

What are we bombing?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wondergirl

What are we bombing?

---

Another country.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

Another country.

---

Who, what, when, why, where, and with whom?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wondergirl

But we aren't at war with Libya.

---

Not constitutionally

Did someone say bringing this back on subject, last time I looked the caption said Libya
Obama forgetting the lessons of Iraq - CNN.com Noting the cost of missiles used so far could it be said that Libya is justified as part of BO's economic stimulation package

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wondergirl

Who, what, when, why, where, and with whom?

---

Have you not been paying attention?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

Have you not been paying attention?

---

I didn't think you had been.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by paraclete

Did someone say bringing this back on subject, last time I looked the caption said Libya
Obama forgetting the lessons of Iraq - CNN.com Noting the cost of missiles used so far could it be said that Libya is justified as part of BO's economic stimulation package

---

Next they will claim he's helping the unemployment numbers doing it too, by keeping pilots employed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smoothy

Next they will claim he's helping the unemployment numbers doing it too, by keeping pilots employed.

---

Hello again, smoothy:

In fact, destroying military equipment, ours OR theirs is VERY good for our economy. It puts LOTS of people to work.. You CAN see that, can't you? It isn't the preferred way to stimulate the economy, at least not from my perspective.


Did ya see Newt's flip flop??? Before Obama did anything Newt WANTED a no fly zone.. AFTER Obama did something, Newt DIDN'T want a no fly zone... This is the guy who was cheating on his wife at the same time he was criticizing Clinton for cheating on his wife... I guess he thinks we're not paying attention...

excon

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smoothy

Next they will claim he's helping the unemployment numbers doing it too, by keeping pilots employed.

---

Well he will certainly be keeping the munitions workers employed replacing those cruise missiles and of course the aircraft industry, spares if not whole aircraft. As I said the whole exercise is another stimulus package. If you have a recession, have a war, it is an old economic strategy. Very soon they will find an excuse for arms shipments to the rebels, just to level the playing field and there is going to be a whole army to reequip when this is over with shinny new tanks and APC and a new air defence system and a whole new air force, should be very stimulatory for the US with Libya as a new client state, lots of lovelly oil dollars

Newt is old news . I don't take his candidacy seriously . His best work has been writing alternate history fiction novels .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tomder55

Newt is old news . I don't take his candidacy seriously . His best work has been writing alternate history fiction novels .

---

Has someone been commenting in similar vein over there, BO must be becoming more transparent these days, at this rate he will be the invisable man in no time