Lions 6-10, 4gm win streak (no longer active streak in the NFL besides the Pats) we're hungry, determined and angry. We've learned to win and not give it away in the 4th. Too bad the seasons done!
It should be an interesting draft!
![]() |
Lions 6-10, 4gm win streak (no longer active streak in the NFL besides the Pats) we're hungry, determined and angry. We've learned to win and not give it away in the 4th. Too bad the seasons done!
It should be an interesting draft!
That is true. I am eager to see what Detroit does with Shaun Hill, he had a huge role in the late success of the Lions and to just dump him when Stafford gets back would be horrible.
Even as a backup he is worth more then ever letting go. Especially with Stanton being #2 if Hill leaves. Ewww... (I'm a huge State boy but Stanton just isn't performing like Hill)
The draft will be exciting that's no doubt. Hill is a free agent now and I'm concerned they're just going to dump him. What a mistake.
I didn't understand why SF let Hill go, his play helped Singletary get the head coaching job.
Time for a nanny state update. No surprise here, the latest city to seek a ban on Happy Meals instead of dealing with real issues is... New York City.
We aren't happy people . I wonder when Comrie will propose banning dirty water hot dog stands ?
Want to see how long it takes for NY to ban being rude?
I don't suggest holding your breath,
Boston Mayor Thomas Menino just banned sugary drinks from city property.
“I want to create a civic environment that makes the healthier choice the easier choice in people’s lives, whether it’s schools, work sites, or other places in the community," said Menino in the press release issued last week about the soda ban.
Menino announced the ban to force people into healthier choices the day after reaching an agreement to allow the sale of mixed drinks at Fenway Park, as Coke is obviously the healthier choice when mixed with Jack Daniels.
I think they should ban wealthy Senators from parking yachts elsewhere to avoid paying taxes to the state they represent.
Or prevent them from Harping on alternative energy like wind power then like the hypocrites they are... work to ban them in their own back yard.
Speech, or at least living in the state he is a Senator for:)
Check out Oregon, politicians are elected but don't even reside here! Is that crazy? Ohhh I have not been up to date on all the issues of late, been out of commission, I can't wait to go read a good year of CRAP you guys write about! LMAO
Start, or showing up for work instead of being "fleebaggers" in another state.
I just need to get back into the swing of things and see what the hell is happening around this world. I will get back with you... LOL
Nice to see you back. :)
Some Chicago schools are now banning lunches packed from home. No word yet on whether they'll allow the sale of mixed drinks.
I read that in this morning's paper. The kids who packed their own lunches brought chips and soda and cookies. The school principal hoped the school would give them a better variety and more nutritious food. The kids are throwing it away.
Go back to chips and sodas and cookies?
I'm thinking the school should involve the kids in making up the menu. Both should compromise.
I can't imagine the ruckus my mom would've made if they prevented us from bringing in the lunches she made for her 5 children.
Actually... yes I can imagine it. She stormed the gates of the schools more than once.
I believe it was stated in the article that other schools are also participating in the ban. Its not stated as to which ones. So far as obese goes what's to stop them from eting more then one meal or when at home doing nothing outside and only playing video games? What studies are now showing is that the more active the children the worse off the diet is because of quick easy choices being made by the parents.
This is just another infringement upon peoples rights.
Ban? If the parents refuse to feed their kids correctly, SOMEone has to.
From the article, "A Chicago Public Schools spokeswoman said she could not say how many schools prohibit packed lunches and that decision is left to the judgment of the principals."
It's not a state "ban."
Then, whose responsibility is it?Quote:
So far as obese goes what's to stop them from eting more then one meal or when at home doing nothing outside and only playing video games?
That makes no sense.Quote:
What studies are now showing is that the more active
The children the worse off the diet is because of quick easy choices being made by the parents.
Then the parents need to talk with the principals.Quote:
infringement on people's rights
It's the responsibility of the parents and the doctors treating the children to consult on eating habits if it has become a problem. If its not a problem then there is no reason to butt into it. Unless you believe the goobermint will save us all from what we do.
Do you really believe in one size fits all type of programs?
Sometimes cookies... sometimes chips too . Usually the sandwich was some brand of bologna conconction or peanut butter (would the school even permit me to bring that into school these days ?),on some soggy bleached white bread .It's the best my parents could do at that time .
When I got lunch money it was usually purchase ice cream from the school ,and save the balance for candy from 7-11 on the way home. On days the school served hot dogs or some chef boyardee concoction I usually got the hot lunch.
What you are saying is that the principle is assuming the parents will act irresponsibly and has decided to assume the role of parent. This is all nanny statism . Yeah there are always good intentions . But bottom line ,it is not their place to decide what parents feed their kids.
Maybe they should concentrate instead on what they are paid to do. Teach the kids!!
And here is the rest of the story. Seems its being pushed by the Federal Goobermint.
Nachos for lunch? Yes, every day - Chicago Tribune
So today's menu is...
Chartwells Schools
I maybe ate lunch at school a half dozen times through sixth grade. I walked home the 5 blocks for lunch 99 percent of the time. In Jr High and High School I got an allowance for lunch, more often than not I ate anywhere but the school cafeteria. Face it, the food sucked and I would never force kids to eat school food or more importantly, say parents can't send their kids to school with a lunch.
Those issues would motivate me to speak up. When mine were in school they knew me by first name. I wasn't knitpicky but I did stand up against the system a few times. I also had a principle tell me that my son had surpassed the capacity in a subject for the private school he was in and they were surprised when I pulled him out of it the next day. Go figure.
Who pays the principal? The people. He is "the state," of, provided by, or concerned with the civil government of a country. I'm still the parent, not him.
Yes. The end of cursive?Quote:
Would you scream if they took recess away from your kid? Or handwriting? Or sentence diagramming?
So then parents will attend PTA meetings, parent-teacher conferences, and be comfortable in the principal's office talking about school policies and procedures -- and reaching compromises.
Well, recess is gone, as is handwriting and diagramming. Someone didn't speak up.Quote:
Michelle Obama probably has her big fat behind involved in this.
After all, Bertha Butt herself has a lot to say about big bums.
Yeah they probably dropped calligraphy and the use of the abacus too.Quote:
Yes. The end of cursive?
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:32 AM. |