Totally agree WG, that's about where I stand too. I deleted the totally hilarious response I had written after reading your post.
|
Totally agree WG, that's about where I stand too. I deleted the totally hilarious response I had written after reading your post.
Tal, just keep your fantasies going. I think you and Athos would make a good combo. You could talk about your rear end fantasies until late into the night. You sure have a love of it. You talk about men's rear ends endlessly.
Why not?Quote:
I would not choose abortion unless my OB had an excellent medical reason to have one done.
You read my post before I deleted it and wrote the above.Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
Yeah, but you still wrote it. Go see a shrink and get some help. You need it. Maybe he/she could see the two of you together. It really is a sickening obsession.
While I'm at the shrink, can you answer the questions I asked?Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
1. Should women who have abortions be charged with murder?
2. Do you support funding into research how to save the lives of zygotes? If not, why not? They are unborn children, are they not?
You want to keep the snark going or respond to WG and my attempt at honest discussion? Makes me no difference.
WG: I would not choose abortion unless my OB had an excellent medical reason to have one done.
A disabled child would not have had a negative impact on my life. Financial instability has never been a problem in my marriage. My relationships have always been free of physical and mental abuse. I have never been a single mother, especially one with few or no financial resources.Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
Geez louise! They paraphrased/reworded your fascination with 45. Get a grip!Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
If you don't like the snark, then don't start it. It's not my sickening obsession.Quote:
You want to keep the snark going
If you had not had the financial resources, and if a disabled child would have had a negative impact, would you have had an abortion?Quote:
A disabled child would not have had a negative impact on my life. Financial instability has never been a problem in my marriage. My relationships have always been free of physical and mental abuse. I have never been a single mother, especially one with few or no financial resources.
If Biden knocked on your front door, would you open it and shake his outstretched hand?Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
Well, so much for the honest discussion. But since you insist on suddenly changing the subject (wonder why?), I'll answer your question. Yes.
You asked me questions that are impossible to answer. I haven't been nor will I ever be in either of those situations. And no, I didn't change the subject. I threw a similarly impossible-to-answer question back at you to stress that answers are not always simply "pick one: yes or no".Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
No he's not covid safeQuote:
Originally Posted by Wondergirl
Biden is. Am guessing JL isn't.Quote:
Originally Posted by paraclete
They're known as hypothetical questions. They are asked and answered all the time and are very useful in probing issues. And of course you changed the subject. This is why I don't like discussing anything with you. You are so fearful and evasive that we can never get anywhere. As soon as you sense some danger to your position in a question then you start dodging and weaving and get as far away from honest discussion as I can imagine. I'm done with it for now as we never will get anywhere for those very reasons.Quote:
You asked me questions that are impossible to answer. I haven't been nor will I ever be in either of those situations. And no, I didn't change the subject. I threw a similarly impossible-to-answer question back at you to stress that answers are not always simply "pick one: yes or no".
You change the subject all the time!!! And I have absolutely no idea what I would do if I were under the pressures you mentioned. I am NOT fearful and evasive. I've always made it a point NOT to be in a bad place in my life.Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
No I think it's the personal attacks that makes people wary, and then the way you turn the blame on them that is the real turn off. Case in point YOU changed the subject to your peeve all the time and blast anyone who disagrees with your position, yet blame the poster?Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
You seem obsessed to be right and relentless to prove it. Personally I don't care because it's just you being you, and it matters little if the trash talk gets escalated or not. Others not so much. I rather like it when you start dodging and weaving looking for an answer you ain't got myself. You do it to everybody else but hate it when it's done to you, so maybe take your tired a$$ to bed because that's what cranky kids are supposed to do.
Here are two hypotheticals you are avoiding. I trust you find them useful in probing issues.Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
1. Should women who have abortions be charged with murder?
2. Do you support funding into research how to save the lives of zygotes? If not, why not? They are unborn children, are they not?
No the Doctor should be charged with murder and woman as accessoryQuote:
Originally Posted by Athos
all research into early childhoos should be fundedQuote:
2. Do you support funding into research how to save the lives of zygotes? If not, why not? They are unborn children, are they not?
Abortions are legal with certain restrictions, so where is the violation of law?Quote:
Originally Posted by paraclete
The controversy is when is life begun. Some say at conception, some say at birth, but what has always been missing is the funding for kids as they develop from that zygote and enter into the real world. I think that's what you have eluded to and I would agree with that.Quote:
all research into early childhoos should be funded
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:04 PM. |