Congress can't know? You missed the larger point, you apparently approve of Obama's lies and corruption and media complicity. My how things have changed since Bush was in office.
![]() |
Who in congress is asking for names? More to the point, why would a journalist need to know? I doubt seriously if the ones on the intelligence committees of congress would share those names with the public any way. Or say anything in public.
Still missing the forest for the trees.
Don't sidestep the issue, just show me who in congress is doing the hollering.
Hello again, Steve:
I still want to know WHY you don't think 11 dead men on the BP oil platform matter? I want to know WHY, when the CEO appeared before congress, the right wingers were trampling all over themselves to lavish praise upon him.
excon
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57566462/$4-billion-bp-oil-spill-criminal-settlement-approved/
The right embraces rich criminals who do bad things. Banks, oil, doesn't matter.
Benghazi is a case of criminal neglect by Democrats in the government... Benghazi it 1,000 times worse than Watergate the Democrats have milked for decades.
Hillary Clinton has blood on her hands... Barrack Obama has even more blood on his hands.
Hello again, smoothy:
As long as we're doing math, BP wins 11-4. Oh, by the way, mine is REAL math.Quote:
Benghazi it 1,000 times worse than Watergate
Excon
I don't remember us 'right wingers' gushing over the BP execs. I do remember Joe Barton saying the slush fund the President extorted from BP was a shake down.
Do YOU think it was a shakedown?
What do you call it ? There was a big difference between the President telling them to fork over some funds without due process ;and the later judicial settlement .
He told them toput some money up front for immediate relief of affected people and the cost of government help, and resources. What tax payers were supposed to ante up for their mistakes?
And because they did does that let them off the hook for civil and criminal liability? I don't think so.
I asked a simple question, what member of congress hasn't gotten what they need as far as info on Benghazi? There is nothing to dance around they know what they need to, even if it not public yet.
Screw a reporter trying to make a story out of it.
So you 're still stuck on a sentence, not the most transparent administration ever's similarity to Nixon.
Hello again,
This is as good a place as any to ask my question. You righty's are worried about 4 dead, and you WANT answers..
On the 10 year anniversary of the Iraq war, I want to know if Bush/Cheney LIED or the CIA was incompetent... We lost over 4,000 dead and over 30,000 wounded. The cost is in the TRILLIONS... And, I WANT answers.
You don't?
excon
PS> And we LOST the war too.
PPS> (edited) Uhhh. They want us to go into Syria and Iran too.
Remember the stink you lefties made of watergate... where NOBODY DIED...
I think Obama should be impeached... 4 people dead because he was too stupid to pay attention is orders of magnitude worse than a simple burglery someone else committed where nobody even got a paper cut.
If we lost the Iraq war its because Owebama ran away like a coward.
We wouldn't have lost Vietnam if they had treated that like a real war... measured responses is the Politically correct term for halfazzing it. Like we were doing there under the rules to prevent engagement Obama imposed.
And incidentally... Bush and CHeney didn't lie... putting your hands over your ears and going lalallalalallalallala doesn't change the fact the intelligence shows there was WMDs... WMD's WERE found... and prood exists that some of those were sent to Syria...
Obama lost the war when he failed to renew the status of forces agreement . Now the enemy is resurgent in Iraq and is for all intents and purposes the same as the jihadists fighting in Syria now . Yesterday the al-Nusra front in Syria used chemical weapons and blamed it on Assad. All indications are that they have the same chlorine signature that AQ in Iraq's chemical weapons had. (yes there were WMD in Iraq... NOBODY disputed that ) .
You supported the Arab Spring.. look what that unleashed . Why don't you want answers for that ?
Hello again, tom:
Couple things... You SAY the WMD's were there, but they could NOT be found. In order to cover for your neo-con buddies, of course, you'd say they were there. Frankly, I have more confidence in our military than you do. If there WERE WMD, our boys would have found them. Don't you think the question would be worth a committee hearing??
In terms of ANSWERS, Bush/Cheney et all work for ME. The Arab Springers don't.
excon
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:56 PM. |