Quote:

---

Originally Posted by excon

Hello again, tom:

If he's the guy that told you the Ambassador was raped by his Libyan guards, then I'd find a more credible source. Maybe briebart.com. They know stuff.

Bwa, ha ha ha.

excon

---

So even if it's the truth it should be disregarded because of the source? Even Dems are demanding answers now led by John Kerry. I don't get it, if this were Bush there would 4 threads demanding his and Cheney's head on a platter, but you are apparently fine with Obama lying to you and campaigning instead of dealing with a terrorist attack that killed an ambassador.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

but you are apparently fine with Obama lying to you and campaigning instead of dealing with a terrorist attack that killed an ambassador.

---

Hello again, Steve:

So, you don't think the DRONE president is looking for 'em with DRONES??

I didn't see a lie. I saw a miscalculation. Look. Didn't he wait too long to declare the Army major a terrorist?? He DID, didn't he? Did that miscalculation END the world? Nope. Did it CHANGE it much? Nope.

I'm STILL missing something... Unless, you wingers are grasping at straws cause your candidate is going down. That could be it...

excon

The only reason you're missing anything is you aren't paying attention. Or more likely, just don't care that Obama is consistently lying to you.

As I remember it 911 was tied to Saddam, so maybe we better chill until the real facts are found out.

Bet you guys would just love the Prez to stop campaigning and hunt for the terrorist himself. That didn't work out for McCain either.

Quote:

---

As I remember it 911 was tied to Saddam

---

You remember wrong ;or perhaps you can find the quote or source where President Bush or anyone in his adm directly made the link that Saddam was behind 9-11.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tomder55

You remember wrong ;or perhaps you can find the quote or source where President Bush or anyone in his adm directly made the link that Saddam was behind 9-11.

---

The impact of Bush linking 9/11 and Iraq / The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com

Hey have you noticed the crisis is over

From the 2nd paragraph of your link... "Bush never pinned blame for the attacks directly on the Iraqi president. "
I thank you for proving my point.

Hey ! History let's get back to the present

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tomder55

from the 2nd paragraph of your link... "Bush never pinned blame for the attacks directly on the Iraqi president. "

---

But there's more.

Quote:

---

Yet the White House appears to be encouraging this false impression, as it seeks to maintain American support for a possible war against Iraq and demonstrate seriousness of purpose to Hussein's regime.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

The only reason you're missing anything is you aren't paying attention. Or more likely, just don't care that Obama is consistently lying to you.

---

BenghaziGate... the President and Evita sent Ambassador Rice on all the major network Sunday shows to advance the lie that the attack on Ambassador Stevens was directly linked to a YouTube video days after they knew the truth. That lie was reinforced by daily press briefings by White House press secretary Jay Carney.(Baghdad Bob).

The President continues to cling to that fiction in interviews and speeches like his address to the UN.
To further bolster their false narrative they chillingly unleashed the Justice Dept on the video maker and arrested him on some minor inconsequential parol violation,sending the message to the world that the US will come down hard legally on anyone who dare speak out against Islam. It is interesting that they would concentrate on that video ,and not on one created by AQ leader
Ayman al-Zawahri calling on jihadists to avenge the death of his 2nd in command , Yahya al-Libi(ie from Libya), killed in a U.S. drone attack.

They are covering up the now known fact that there was plenty of indication that the Ambassador was personally at risk .Still they didn't even bother to take the precautions of beefing up US security in the region on the anniverary of 9-11 . This after they knew that the counsellate in Benghazi had previously been attacked by bomb in June. Perhaps if he had attended some of the daily national security briefings he would know these basic facts.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tomder55

The President continues to cling to that fiction in interviews and speeches like his address to the UN.

---

Hello again, tom:

I've been asking what the fuss is all about, but nobody here can tell me.. I was watching Hannity last night and HE told me...

It was like I thought... Obama made a speech in Cairo, and you right wingers THOUGHT he solved the Middle East forever.. When you found out he DIDN'T, it was PROOF that his foreign policy is in shambles and he should be replaced by Mitt Romney...

Boy, you guys are really unhappy that Romney is going to LOSE, aren't you?

excon

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by excon

Hello again, tom:

I've been asking what the fuss is all about, but nobody here can tell me.. I was watching Hannity last night and HE told me...

It was like I thought... Obama made a speech in Cairo, and you right wingers THOUGHT he solved the Middle East forever.. When you found out he DIDN'T, it was PROOF that his foreign policy is in shambles and he should be replaced by Mitt Romney...

Boy, you guys are really unhappy that Romney is
gonna LOSE, aren't you?

excon

---

You've learned the Obama way well my son. No matter what, keep advancing the false narrative.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

You've learned the Obama way well my son. No matter what, keep advancing the false narrative.

---

Hello again, Steve:

Well, what's the RIGHT narrative? That the Middle East is in shambles and that Obama didn't stop it? Duh!

excon

PS> (edited) Look, Steve. I'm up on world affairs. I want to know who's screwing it up. But, to find out that the Middle East is a dangerous place, and that they want to kill us, ISN'T surprising. That they got away with another attack, is NOT surprising... That Obama was SLOW to grasp it, is NOT surprising... That you think there's some sort of conspiracy and/or coverup in the White House over it, is NOT surprising...

But, that you think it means the end of the world is pretty surprising...

No not the end of the world... just the end of the Obama Presidency and his phoney narrative that he ended the war on terrorism by wacking OBL and subverting the victory in Iraq.

Hello tom:

I can SMELL the desperation on you. It don't smell good.

excon

Obama can screw up until the cows come home, NOBODY thinks Mitt can do better. Like Grover said he won't be making policy just signing where they tell him. Have you forgotten what he told the donors at his 47% lunch? There is nothing he can do about the situation in the rest of the world.

Just curious. What will you guys do if Mitt loses?

Washington Post details the incompetence of the security arrangement in Benghazi.
In Libya, security was lax before attack that killed U.S. ambassador, officials say - The Washington Post

Quote:

---

But as Stevens met with Benghazi civic leaders, U.S. officials appear to have underestimated the threat facing both the ambassador and other Americans. They had not reinforced the U.S. diplomatic outpost there to meet strict safety standards for government buildings overseas. Nor had they posted a U.S. Marine detachment, as at other diplomatic sites in high-threat regions.

---

Quote:

---

Just curious. What will you guys do if Mitt loses?

---

Haven't considered that possibility .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tomder55

Haven't considered that possibility .

---

http://www.u-tax.co.uk/blog/image.ax...ad-in-sand.jpg