Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cozyk

Hey righties, you got to find another fault. That one statement has been beat to death. As I said once before, what else you got?

---

That one statement says it all, Cosyk. She said it. End of story.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wondergirl

I spent over $17,000 and three years of grad school learning about empathy. Just because one has empathy doesn't mean one will cave, but it does mean one can get inside someone else's skin and imagine how that person feels--not a bad ability nowadays. So a Justice has empathy? Why is this a problem? I'm guessing at least the females on the SC have had empathy. Maybe it's not a guy thing.

---

It is a problem because it VIOLATES THEIR OATH OF OFFICE. It is a problem because justice is SUPPOSED to be blind. It is a problem because it violates the ethical requirement of the judge to not see under the person's skin, but rather simply to interpret and apply the LAW.

It is a problem because it goes against the very duties and responsibilities of a SCOTUS Justice.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ETWolverine

It is a problem because it violates the ethical requirement of the judge to not see under the person's skin, but rather simply to interpret and apply the LAW.... It is a problem because it goes against the very duties and responsibilities of a SCOTUS Justice.

---

Hello El:

I can see you missed my Jewish posts a few pages back. You oughta check 'em out. I'll bet you'll have something to say...

excon

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by excon

Hello El:

I can see you missed my Jewish posts a few pages back. You oughta check 'em out. I'll bet you'll have something to say...

excon

---

No he did respond to them on the last page!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Skell

No he did respond to em on the last page!!

---

Hey Skell:

So he did. You know, we got to stop arguing so fast. I can't keep up.

excon

https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/curren...ml#post1787913

What do you Sotomayor supporters have to say about this case?

Did you choose to ignore it because it really shines a light on to her as a judge and not as some individual to fulfill a demographic quota?





G&P