Opinions and anecdotes aside it was clear in the last election who the females thought was on their side, and who wasn't.
|
Opinions and anecdotes aside it was clear in the last election who the females thought was on their side, and who wasn't.
What you're saying is women like to be treated as helpless Julias and sex objects? That they enjoy being lied to and get paid less than men?
That's not what I am saying. And that's not what the concept of Julia is about. That's not what the woman who voted for the president is about. That not what the minorities who run from you like the plague are about.
You guys are lousy listeners and its biting you in the butt across the land. You aren't listening, just hollering.
All men are lousy listeners but that's another thread. The point of Julia that you guys don't want to admit is your side WANTS women dependent on you just as you do minorities. You don't like strong, independent women because they think for themselves. That's why your side reflexively bashes a Sarah Palin, a Michelle Malkin, an Ann Coulter because they see through your scam and point out the hypocrisy.
Nearly five decades of the left's effort to bring “equality" to women has gotten us what? The nuclear family is destroyed, millions of abortions, millions of children born of single mothers who don't need men living in poverty - 70 percent of high school dropouts are the children of single women - and the only answer you have is more of the same, free birth control, more spending, more government DEPENDENCE.
I understand that by nature women generally WANT someone to nurture, protect and care for them. I happen to believe that should be a responsible man, a father, a husband. Your side believes government should fill that role. Which does more good and less damage? The evidence doesn't point to the liberal agenda, and if they don't vote for my side I can live with that, it's better than lying to them.
Actually, most of don't. We want opportunities that the righties don't want to give us, but, instead, prefer to keep us barefoot and pregnant and with a small allowance so we can grocery shop and cook a nice dinner.Quote:
Originally Posted by speechlesstx
Bullsh*t, I know better and that barefoot and pregnant line is as pathetic today as it was the first time I heard it. I have never seen a little girl that didn't want to be loved, nurtured and protected - until they got into school and had their brains filled with liberal mush.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wondergirl
Interesting belief, one I disagree with vehemently.Quote:
All men are lousy listeners
No that's a religious thing such as Promise Keepers - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaQuote:
your side WANTS women dependent on you
It's the message, vitirol and hate they spew not their gender. Same with Limbaugh.Quote:
That's why your side reflexively bashes a Sarah Palin, a Michelle Malkin, an Ann Coulter
Nope, you keep repeating it to make yourself feel better but it's not the case.Quote:
I happen to believe that should be a responsible man, a father, a husband. Your side believes government should fill that role.
I really don't care what drivel you post, it's just lies.
Little boys need to be loved, nurtured, and protected too. That's what a two-parent family is supposed to do, plus the partners validate each other. And don't forget, I'm from a family of Republicans and married into a family of Republicans and actually listen to dinner table and living room conversations about what the role of women is to be. There are many things I haven't been allowed to do (yes, allowed to do!) because I was born in the wrong decade and happen to have the wrong plumbing. Democrats don't seem to care about my plumbing.Quote:
Originally Posted by speechlesstx
I'm sorry, but that's not my conservative family. We don't talk that way, it's not preached in our conservative church, and I do nearly all the cooking for my wife and daughter, my own laundry, iron my own shirts, sweep, mop, do dishes and clean the toilet if it needs it. And I stand firm on my statement:Quote:
Originally Posted by Wondergirl
"I have never seen a little girl that didn't want to be loved, nurtured and protected - until they got into school and had their brains filled with liberal mush."
One can still be a strong, independent woman and want the other, too, but the liberal lie says they can't, they don't need a man, they can be promiscuous, it's not really a child so they can kill it at will - yet they need big daddy government - the same big daddy government that pays their female employees less than men, makes them pole dance for a job and get subjected to tweeted pics of their stuff.
Or, as Hitler's mistress, just get sent "back to wherever the hell she came from."
Quote:
Former South Carolina Democratic party chairman Harpootlian today attempted to clarify remarks he made Friday at the party’s Jefferson-Jackson dinner when he assured the audience that the Democratic challenger to GOP governor Nikki Haley would “send her back to wherever the hell she came from.”
Many understood Harpootlian’s barb to be directed at Haley’s ethnicity — she is the Indian-American daughter of Sikh immigrants. The longtime Democratic activist immediately waved off such criticism, and today told MSNBC, “All I’m suggesting is she needs to go back to being an accountant in a dress store rather than being this fraud of a governor that we have.”
Haley, who was raised in Bamberg, S.C. previously worked in her parents’ clothing business, Exotica International, and took over the bookkeeping there at the age of 13.
Harpootlian is no stranger to controversy. At last year’s Democratic National Convention, he compared Haley to Hitler’s mistress — after she participated in a press conference from a basement television studio at the NASCAR Hall of Fame in Charlotte, N.C. Harpootlian said she was “down in the bunker á la Eva Braun.”
He was replaced as chairman of South Carolina’s Democratic party on Friday.
This thread has reached 1500 posts. Time to start a new one.
THREAD CLOSED
Hello again,
Couple things...
I don't know where this 1500 post limit came from, but it's NOT in the software, and it's NOT in the rules. This is a VIABLE thread discussing important issues of the day. Indeed. There are posts here as recent as yesterday.
For those reasons, the thread is now,
REOPENED
excon
Come on ex move on the whole subject is ad nausium anyway there is no war on women, you should ask about the war on men
“The Whole World in Her Hands”: A Gyno-Maniacal War on Men? – UPDATED
Never mind I'll start a new thread
That was my question, what's the logic in closing a popular thread?
These things have a habit of straying from the point
It's unbelievable the amt of power mods have on this site. This issue is current and is it really relevant if the users create a new thred ,or continue discussions on existing ones ?
Clete ,love the 1st comment on the link
It has finally come to this: Purity is despised while amateur prostitution is elevated to the societal level of a secular virtue.
Another example of this can be found in today's Foreign Policy Magazine. It argues that there is a sexual revolution that has the potential to topple the Iranian regime. This sexual revolution in sum is a drop in birth rates ,more abortions ,more divorces etc. The author seems to argue that these imitations of Western culture is a good thing for the country .
Erotic Republic - By Afshin Shahi | Foreign Policy
Please note the 1500 post limit is site policy and has been for several years.
This is mostly due to search engine spiders.
Feel free to continue in a Part Two.
>Finally Closed<
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:16 AM. |