You mean to say you don't think he could remove it with a Presidential Order?Quote:
Originally Posted by tomder55
|
You mean to say you don't think he could remove it with a Presidential Order?Quote:
Originally Posted by tomder55
The STATE of Michigan declared water in Flint safe and ended the free bottled water give away earlier this month . The EPA gave $100 million to solved the problem.
Would you drink it?Quote:
Originally Posted by tomder55
https://www.michigan.gov/flintwater
Quote:
Will filters and water test kits continue to be available?
Yes. The state will continue to provide free water filters, replacement cartridges, and water testing kits until service line replacement is completed. Filters will continue to be available for residents who feel more comfortable using a filter until their confidence in the water quality can be re-established. Filters and residential sampling kits are available at City Hall or by contacting CORE at 810-238-6700.
QUOTE]not without passing it through a charcoal filter .But that is how I deal with public water at home also .Would you drink it?[/QUOTE]
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...-helped-trump/
Senate Intelligence committee backs finding that Russia tried to help Trump
Unlike the House investigation clown circus with it's republican sycophants for the president, Nunes, Jordan, and Gowdy, the Senate was a bipartisan investigation.Quote:
Congress’ leading probe into the Russian meddling issue released a summary of its initial findings on Tuesday, which concluded that the “overall judgments” made by the country’s leading intelligence agencies in January 2017 “were well-supported and the tradecraft was strong.”The committee’s investigation also found “that the Russian cyber operations were more extensive than the hack of the Democratic National Committee and continued well through the 2016 election.”
The Democrats were a short time ago skeptics of Intel assessments. Even when proof backed up the assertions they doubted the reliability of intel ;not just gathered by the hand picked investigators of political hack James Clapper ,but of the world's intel agencies evaluations . Here we have a case where there has been zero evidence submitted to the public ;yet we are asked to trust the assessment of the Intel agencies .
The report doesn't imply that the Russians influenced the outcome of the election -- only that they had ambitions to do so.Now let's for argument sake grant that Russia's agitprop campaign was designed to undermine Evita and help Trump win . Where is the proof of "collusion " by the Trump campaign ? I'm sorry ,buttelling us that Clapper, Brennan and Comey said so does not convince .One could also ask why the investigation into Russian meddling was put on "stand down " during the fall of 2018 ?
https://www.onenewsnow.com/politics-...efit-or-obamasQuote:
isch: "'We've been told to stand down.' … 'I was incredulous and in disbelief. It took me a moment to process.' … Is that an accurate description of what happened?"Daniel: "That is an accurate rendering of the conversation at the staff meeting."Daniel went on to say it was "not accurate to say all activities [related to the investigation] ceased at that point," but essentially he had been told by Susan Rice to stop investigating Russian meddling at its height – more than two months before the election.
Of the 2 candidates ,I can only think of one where there is proof of aiding Russia. That would be Evita's Uranium One deal with it's$$$$ 145 Million to the Clinton Foundation.If one calls a few thousand spent on pathetic social media plugs interference then what would they call paying for a fake dossier to support using intel services to spy on a campaign via FISA warrants and implanting politically motivated FBI hacks into the oppositions campaign ?
BTW where did the Democrat's server go ? Convenient that it just went missing when the truth about the hacks are there for discovery.
It was fall 2016, and from your link source
You also forget that Slick Mitch and repub leaders refused to go along with the plan to make it public in a bipartisan way, preferring to make it a dem political stunt if Obama released the info anyway. Which is exactly what the Dufus claims now, and exactly why you are repeating his talking points yet again.Quote:
[SIZE=4][COLOR=#333333]Daniel[/COLOR][/SIZE]: "... We shifted our focus in that September and October time frame to focus heavily on better protecting and assisting the states in better protecting the electoral infrastructure and ensuring that we had the greatest visibility as possible into what the Russians were doing and developing essentially an incident response plan for election day."
That was his answer to Bartiromo's question about bringing up Russian interference in the election.Quote:
BTW where did the Democrat's server go ? Convenient that it just went missing when the truth about the hacks are there for discovery.
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/other...ump/ar-AAzuYiL
Of course we know his statement is just another LIE he feeds the gullibles and sycophants.Quote:
The morning host later asked Trump if he would bring up Russian interference in the election during his upcoming summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump ignored the question, instead saying he would like to know "why the FBI didn't take the server from the DNC," apparently referring to the unsubstantiated claim that the Democratic National Committee refused to cooperate with federal law enforcement during its investigation of its hacked server during the 2016 election.
Did John Podesta deny CIA and FBI access to DNC server, as Donald Trump claims? | PolitiFact
I don't need your computer if I download YOUR hard drive to put it in simple terms for the technologically challenged.Quote:
The DNC says it cooperated with the FBI, providing information on the server through a third-party vendor.The FBI provided no comment, but then-FBI director Comey said it was an appropriate substitute.
Robert Mueller ,in a court filing Friday ,said that his prosecutors will not present evidence regarding Trump campaign collusion with Russia during the upcoming trial for Paul Manafort. That's because he's got nothing .
So show trial in the best leftist traditions
Place your bets folks. Simple logic, why would he show anything about The Dufus in the Manafort trial? Manafort is NAILED as is.
Why do you indulge this BS
It's just a discussion what's your problem?
No problem, it is irrelevant
The next big news will come from what Michael Cohen does in the next few weeks as the noose tightens around him. Now that will be very relevant.
Speculation
Probable cause!
Manafort is being charged with unrelated business activity years before he was briefly part of the Trump campaign. btw Manafort is being held in solitary confinement 23 hrs a day . They don't treat serial killers that badly. Could it be they don't want him involved in preparing his defense ?
I agree Manafort was an international criminal long before The Dufus hired him. CHEAP! If the Dufus can imprison little kids and teens then isolating Manafort for his own safety shouldn't bother you.
https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnew...ussian-companyQuote:
I agree Manafort was an international criminal long before The Dufus hired him.
https://qz.com/1291470/photos-immigr...enter-in-2014/Quote:
If the Dufus can imprison little kids and teens then isolating Manafort for his own safety shouldn't bother you.
So why is catching a criminal big news, are they hard to catch over there
White collar criminal types are hard to convict
https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...slVIJ2hwtQ--~C
Ask Tom, he thinks jails are for poor people and rich guys should be above the law.
pure nonsense ! I think jail is for the guilty ;not to pressure someone to testify against a different target like what happened to Judith Miller during the Plame leak investigation ..... or Manafort being confined to solitary confinement as if he is a threat to the prison population . Oh I think there are quite a few rich criminals that deserve frog marching in orange pant suits .... Evita comes to mind .Quote:
Ask Tom, he thinks jails are for poor people and rich guys should be above the law.
Maybe the prison population is a threat to Manafort, which makes it for his own good, and his boss being The Dufus sharing the cell comes to my mind.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomder55
Manafort is in jail for witness tampering - a very serious crime that goes to the heart of the justice system itself.
However, solitary confinement seems excessive.
During the Ken Starr investigation, the Clintoons set up a Joint Defense Team for all Clintoon people to be coached and represented by the Clintoon defense attorneys. They essentially rehearsed the witnesses ahead of time. As with everything else the Clintoons do, they got away with it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomder55
Rehearsing witnesses is perfectly legal. Tampering with witnesses - aka suborning perjury - is NOT legal. It is a felony.
Yep the witch hunter has got 12 more specific witches (Russians) tied to Putin for interfering in the 2016 election.
https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2018...3111531499393/
AND
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.a28543a7ab38
Wonder if The Dufus will pimp slap Vlad if he lies about it when they meet Monday? The Dufus was briefed earlier this week on the indictments.
more indictments of people he will never bring to trial . This is the Friday news dump to counter the disaster Strzok Congressional testimony.
so I can't quite figure it out . Is Julian Assange and Wikileaks heroes or traitors this week ?Quote:
There was "no evidence" any tampering affected the vote count in any 2016 election, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said at a news conference Friday.
So why didn't the FBI use FISA warrants and infiltrators to spy on the Sanders campaign ?Quote:
“if you have anything Hillary related we want it in the next tweo [sic] days prefable [sic] because the DNC [Democratic National Convention] is approaching and she will solidify bernie supporters behind her after,” referring to Clinton’s rival for the Democratic nomination, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). WikiLeaks explained, “we think trump has only a 25% chance of winning against hillary . . . so conflict between bernie and hillary is interesting.”
For a Friday news dump, it sure lays the predicate for an underlying crime very well.
https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download
From
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018...t-to-collusion
It's been floated that this hack into the election is retaliation for the Panama Papers.Quote:
According to the indictment, a figure posing as Guccifer 2.0 communicated with “a person who was in regular contact with senior members of the presidential campaign.” In August 2016,the indictmentsays, “Guccifer 2.0” wrote to this person, “Thank u for writing back . . . do u find anyt[h]ing interesting in the docs i posted?” Two days later, they said, “please tell me if i can help u anyhow . . . it would be a great pleasure to me.”
All he is doing is giving Donald ammunition for his meeting with Vlad
To do what arrest him? Pimp slap him? What's the Dufus going to do to the guy who helped him get elected?
Obviously he is going to shake his hand, where have you been lately, oh I know, gazing down upon us lesser beings from your fundamental orificeQuote:
Originally Posted by talaniman
I think he will say to Vlad thanks for your help but please don't do it again to which Vlad will reply do you think you could stay out of Ukraine. Ukraine is to Russia what Taiwan is to China
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018...t-to-collusion
That would be Roger Stone ;and no Guccifer 2.0 was not Russian military . Stone admits his contact with Guccifer 2 .0 .Why is he not on the indictment ? We will never know of course because Mueller never intended to bring these Russians to trial . It is no secret in the real world that the hacks came from within the Democrat campaign .That's one of the reasons why the Dems took so much effort to scrubbing their servers by CrowdStrike and making them missing .Quote:
According to the indictment, a figure posing as Guccifer 2.0 communicated with “a person who was in regular contact with senior members of the presidential campaign.” In August 2016,the indictmentsays, “Guccifer 2.0” wrote to this person, “Thank u for writing back . . . do u find anyt[h]ing interesting in the docs i posted?” Two days later, they said, “please tell me if i can help u anyhow . . . it would be a great pleasure to me.”
Why was it that the emperor hiredSteven Chabinsky, the general counsel and chief risk officer for CrowdStrike, to the 'Commission on Enhancing National Cybersecurity ' 2 months before the report that alleged Russian hacking ?
It was CrowdStrike that 1st alleged Russian hacking .
Why didn't the FBI examine the DNC Server themselves ? Why did they take the word of CrowdStrike without corroboration ? The DNC said the FBI never requested to see the server . Comey told the Senate there were multiple requests by the FBI that were ignored . Who's lying ? The FBI and Mueller is using on faith the narrative the DNC provided …. oh wait ,that's right ...the DNC handed over to the FBI a 'replica' of the server that was created by ….you guessed it..... CrowdStrike .
So what is CrowdStrike ? Well they are a cyber -security firm largely funded by Clintoon backing Google .Another funder of the company is Warburg Pincus ,a company run by former Clintoon staffer Timothy Geithner .
And of course this wasn't the 1st time Evita or her interests were involved in destroying forensic evidence . They did the same thing to Evita's private served .
This alone is enough cause to get Mueller's case tossed .
The timing of the announcement is suspicious ,with Strzok making an a$$ of himself in Congressional hearings and right before Trump and Putin's sit down .
The timing is perfect, just like Comey's announcements, How come he isn't investigating Comey for interference?
That was the best right wing loony mish moss I ever read. Alex Jones has nothing on you guys.
Hacking incidents under the emperor ...
DPRK launched Sony hack, December 2014
Home-brew server reveal, March 2015.
Shanghai launched OPM theft, June 2015.
GRU spearfishing start March 2016.
Question …. why did the emperor tell his cyber security expert to stand down when he started investigating allegations of Russian hacks of the DNC ? https://www.yahoo.com/news/obama-cyb...204935758.html
Hillary conceded, Obama transferred power, and The Dufus is breaking the "CHINA"! LOL, Russia wasn't on peoples mind when Romney ran, though the man was correct given events of a few years later. Wonder why none of Dufus's underlings admitted to, nor REPORTED any contacts with Putin's flunkies AFTER being warned they would try? Wonder why Slick Mitch didn't want the American people to be warned of Russia's antics before the election and threatened to politicize the facts if it was revealed?
Have you forgotten that state and local officials discovered hacking from outside sources during the 2016 campaign? The Dufus has NEVER acknowledged any of this or done a darn thing about it since he became Prez! Explain that to me Tom?
Are you seriously accusing Yertle of a conspiracy to steal the election ? You'd have to wake him up first .Quote:
Wonder why Slick Mitch didn't want the American people to be warned of Russia's antics before the election and threatened to politicize the facts if it was revealed?
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:37 PM. |