The longer they take the less relevant they become.
So much for a "bare metal" build, this is a classic DR scenario and should have been handled in a more timely manner.
![]() |
I got on , There are limited messages from site owner and from conservative celebs Sean Hannity ,Mark Levin and Sen Rand Paul .
Parler Status Updates
Meanwhile Congress is aiming to pile on .House Oversight Committee Chair Carolyn Maloney asked the FBI to investigate Parler for a possible role as a 'facilitator ' in the Jan 6 riot in the Capitol .
There seems to be no end to the insanity. But if they want to press that, wouldn't Amazon have to be included? After all, it was their very own AWS that was hosting the Parler site.Quote:
House Oversight Committee Chair Carolyn Maloney asked the FBI to investigate Parler for a possible role as a 'facilitator ' in the Jan 6 riot in the Capitol .
Now on Netflix, well worth the watch, goes a long way to explain alot about how Social Media actually works.
/The Social Dilemma
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uaaC57tcci0
IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11464826/
Netflix: https://www.netflix.com/title/81254224
Well crud. We dropped Netflix months ago. Even at that, after watching documentaries like that one, you still don't know if you have seen the unvarnished truth since you don't hear the counter arguments. Frustrating.
Amazon says Jeff Bezos will step down as CEO.
As for the documentary ,I am not fond of that format . The whole thing could've been condensed . I'm a personal responsibility type of person. I take ownership of my actions . So no matter how much so called manipulation I am subject to ;my thoughts and actions are my own,
Tom, socialist? You are riding the wrong horse there athos
I take ownership of choosing to not answer your questions Deal with it .
consider this conversation over .
Just mention the word "Aquinas".
Speaking of nonsense this qualifies
In the meantime another defamation lawsuit against Faux News and dufus true believers.
Smartmatic's $2.7 billion lawsuit against Fox News: Legal experts give their opinions - CNN
Quote:
"When you are making statements that are knowingly false, and you make them with malice, and you actually tarnish reputations and it has a financial consequence — that's why you have defamation lawsuits in the first place," Coates said, explaining the seriousness of the lawsuit.
Coates is not alone in believing Smartmatic's suit poses real threat to Fox. University of Georgia media law professor Jonathan Peters noted on Twitter that "libel law makes it difficult to prevail where the plaintiff is a public figure and/or where the speech involved a matter of public concern. In various ways, these will be key issues in litigation." But, Peters added that he believed the "smart money" is on Smartmatic.
That seemed to be the general consensus among legal experts who commented on the case Thursday. Despite Fox describing the suit as "meritless," Powell calling it a "political maneuver," and Giuliani saying he looked forward to discovery, most legal experts believed it to have some bite. "This lawsuit is a legitimate threat — a real threat," CNN legal analyst Ellie Honig said. "There is a real teeth to this." And Roy Gutterman, who directs the Tully Center for Free Speech at Syracuse University, echoed to WaPo, "This complaint establishes a compelling narrative in its 270-plus pages. It will certainly be interesting to see how the defendants frame their responses."
discovery
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:04 PM. |