Quote:

---

yet like JL, still want to prosecute the so called process crimes of Hillary.

---

Seems hypocritical of you to be so happy and enthusiastic to see these guys prosecuted, and yet when we know without question that HC destroyed evidence, you are fine with letting her walk. Strange. As I frequently say, it's all about politics.

Evidence of what exactly? You don't know do you?

I know exactly what it was and so does everyone else not blinded by liberal bias. She destroyed, by great effort, half of the data on her toy email server which the feds wanted. It could not be any plainer.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

I know exactly what it was and so does everyone else not blinded by liberal bias. She destroyed, by great effort, half of the data on her toy email server which the feds wanted. It could not be any plainer.

---

She destroyed evidence of what?

Quote:

---

She destroyed evidence of what?

---

Well, since she destroyed it, then it would be kind of hard to know what it would have been evidence of. I'm sure it was OK since, after all, she said it was. So we'll never know, will we? But they were able to recover enough to know that she had classified material on her toy server, which is a violation of federal law. I'm sure that when AG Lynch met with Bill Clinton for nearly an hour in private, they did not discuss any of those issues, and the decision to not charge HC four days later had no connection with the meeting.

How much of this garbage are you prepared to put up with?? Once again, it's all about politics. She supported gay marriage and abortion, so most libs did not care what she did wrong.

Quote:

---

I find it amusing you defend the wrong doing of these career criminals and con men, yet like JL, still want to prosecute the so called process crimes of Hillary

---

destroying State dept classified material is not in the league of a process crime . It is more like treason .

Quote:

---

She destroyed evidence of what?

---

Since we haven't seen the classified emails she destroyed then that would be hard to answer. That she destroyed emails that belonged to the State Dept from a server she was illegally using is in itself a felony . But if I was to guess ,it was probably evidence of the pay to play scheme she was using in her position as Sec State enriching the Clinton crime family and laundering the bribes through the Clinton Foundation. That would be a good guess. Under the radar ;multiple FBI offices have been running a pay for play investigation for about a year now .

tal ;revelations about Comey admittedly watering down his report about Evita's server and conduct at State ;and that he came to a conclusion before any witnesses were questioned will undoubtedly be revisiting by the new Justice Dept regime now that the old guard is finally being shown the door . At this point Evita will probably argue the statute of limitations has passed .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

Well, since she destroyed it, then it would be kind of hard to know what it would have been evidence of.

---

Another unbelievable comment from one who so prizes evidence.

Quote:

---

She supported gay marriage and abortion.

---

Ahhh, the REAL reason HC is so hated by the loony right.

Quote:

---

Another unbelievable comment from one who so prizes evidence.

---

You're not thinking. Yes, I prize evidence, which is why it is alarming that HC destroyed evidence.

If supporting life and traditional marriage makes me a loon, then I'm loon, but I suspect the shoe is actually on the other foot.

What I don't understand is why we are discussing old accusations against Hilliary, proven or otherwise, when this thread is about Trump attitude to journalists

That's what conservatives do here Clete, when they cannot discuss or debate current issues they dredge up old ones. They have been slinging mud at Hillary so long they just can't stop. They fear the pace of a rapidly changing world. I certainly can understand them being overwhelmed right now.

Evita's past is still relevent in this case since it was her campaign that fabricated the allegations .

Quote:

---

That's what conservatives do here Clete, when they cannot discuss or debate current issues they dredge up old ones. They have been slinging mud at Hillary so long they just can't stop. They fear the pace of a rapidly changing world. I certainly can understand them being overwhelmed right now.

---

It's takes a mud-slinger to know a mud-slinger! (<:

Thank you JL. So true.

https://media2.s-nbcnews.com/j/newsc...3.fit-760w.jpg

I'll have more flexibility once you win the election. How's the dossier sellingwith the FISA court ?

That's pretty good Tom, but didn't conservatives pay to get that dossier started against the dufus before the HC picked it up?

Quote:

---

That's pretty good Tom, but didn't conservatives pay to get that dossier started against the dufus before the HC picked it up?

---

Where did you get that from? And if you link an article, please make it an accurate and pertinent one.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

Where did you get that from? And if you link an article, please make it an accurate and pertinent one.

---

Hello the thought police have arrived, thou shat have no opinion but mine

Quote:

---

Hello the thought police have arrived, thou shat have no opinion but mine

---

Just shooting for accuracy. You should try it yourself!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

Just shooting for accuracy. You should try it yourself!

---

No I prefer the shotgun approach

Quote:

---

No I prefer the shotgun approach

---

Great answer! It does tend to guarantee at least hitting something.