Quote:
Originally Posted by talaniman
Law Enforcement
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by talaniman
Law Enforcement
It seems they have a comprenhensive portfolio and authority, a sort of when are the police not the police sort of thingQuote:
Originally Posted by cdad
yeh! funny about that never mind Putin can invade the Ukraine and Obama can take lessons
He probibly has velcro straps on his shoes because he had trouble learning to tie them.
Hey I have velco on my shoes, doesn't make me stupid, I can't reach the laces anymore besides it's quicker and I'm all for not wasting time. Wait, what am I doing here.
get with the future, man, laces are so ninetheenth century, or if you were Tom eighteenth century
There is a big difference between not wanting to tie them and not knowing how to tie them. I think it's a safe bet that you know how to tie them.
Yeh but I used to wear 'lastic sided
We call those loafers... I like them because I can quickly and easily slip them on and off when I come into and leave my house.Quote:
Originally Posted by paraclete
Meanwhile the emperor plans on seizing more lands .
Obama to designate national monument in New Mexico - Washington Times
Seems like the right thing to do:
Our next national monument: New Mexico's Organ Mountains-Desert Peaks | Wilderness.org
I think we should annex Canada and make the entire thing a National Park.
Ok. It's beautiful here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedKarma
Some of what I've actually seen in the eastern part of the country is. I'd agree. I really liked Prince Edward Island for example. Nova Scotia was nice but a bit rocky for my tates. Can't say Newfoundland really managed to stick in my memory like those two places did.
I can see you guys being mad about the president acting when everybody else drags their feet, and this isn't the first time conservatives have used the excuse of border security to do NOTHING. Actually it adds more government agents to that part of the border to assist local sheriffs, with manpower and resources that they don't have as well as coordinated management where their was hardly NONE!
Closing roads to sheriffs was always BOGUS, an excuse NOT to have to coordinate with federal law enforcement. We have seen this before and always knew the Bundy style free use of public lands was not restricted to just Nevada. This has always been about the authority of duly organized ranchers/cattlemen against the free rangers who obey no rules but their own.
New Mexico Cattle Growers' Association
Of course its spun as a land grab by conservatives, but the missing FACT is the support of a larger organized and lawful group of ranchers in EVERY state. I pointed out before how Bundy wasn't a member and didn't want to pay dues or follow their regulations either, from the Association in Nevada and had no support from them.
But buy a uninspected cow from Bundy and his ilk. You can't because most slaughterhouses won't accept them.
Range war: County resolves to solve wild horse problem if BLM prioritizes Bundy cattle | St George News
Reducing this widespread complex issue to a spectacular headline is pure CRAP!!Quote:
“The budget calls for an increase of $2.8 million for the Wild Horse and Burro program that would allow the BLM to continue multi-year studies focused on the development of more effective and longer-lasting fertility control agents and techniques,” The BLM said in a statement. “It would also further the BLM's implementation of the National Academy of Sciences recommendations made in 2013.”
On Thursday, the Washington County Commission held an emergency meeting concerning the gathering of Bundy's cattle. It passed a resolution against the transport and sale of the cattle across state lines into Utah, citing the cattle may not have been properly immunized and could contaminate other cattle within the state.
Grazing rights on public land in Clark County. Nev., have either been reduced or closed in the last 20 years in order to secure and preserve habitat for the desert tortoise. However, Bundy chose to ignore BLM regulations and has declared the agency unconstitutional, citing a states rights versus federal overreach argument. Now, after 20 years of back-and-forth between Bundy and the BLM, it and other federal agencies are moving in to physically remove his cattle.
gotta keep the drug runners and human trafficer routes pristine. No doubt the ranchers will be driven off the land in defense of the Organ Mountain Colorado chipmunk and the prickley pear. What the emperor really is doing is ensuring that the Fed government has the say about who gets to exploit the mineral right.
The Feds have had the rights to the eastern flank of this pristine land for ages ... It's where Fort Bliss White Sands Missile Range is . They have been slamming missiles into those mountains for decades.
Attachment 46058
On the western flank (not shown in your photos ) is grass lands that ranchers have used since before there was a USA .
Attachment 46057
I'd say that private interests have been better stewards of the land.
I'd say you'd be wrong.Quote:
I'd say that private interests have been better stewards of the land.
All the more reason to protect the area.Quote:
It's where Fort Bliss White Sands Missile Range is
All you are doing here is supporting the rent seeking system of trade associations charging fees for admission into exclusive clubs. Your Rancher Associations are nothing more than attempts to restrict their trade to members(the already haves) . You see that in many professions that restrict access in this country . These associations of course have a vested interest in the government providing the muscle for the enforcement of their trade rules.Quote:
Of course its spun as a land grab by conservatives, but the missing FACT is the support of a larger organized and lawful group of ranchers in EVERY state. I pointed out before how Bundy wasn't a member and didn't want to pay dues or follow their regulations either, from the Association in Nevada and had no support from them.
But buy a uninspected cow from Bundy and his ilk. You can't because most slaughterhouses won't accept them.
Yes they have a vested interest in defending themselves and the country from rustlers and thieves.
like the BLM ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomder55
Consider the similarities between Labor Unions and Grange Associations. High membership fees, Regulations governing how and when you work, stifling competition by the use of laws: there are differences, but one has to wonder if the Cattle industry is going to go the way of the Auto industry.
Unions are formed and officers are voted on to give workers a voice on wages, benefits, rules, policy and procedure. That how you got a vibrant middle class in America, and why it's not so vibrant now.
Thanks conservatives for screwing that up. No surprise you favor credit downgrades and shrinking capital revenues producing shortfalls in your states budgets, and services, after giving rich guys a tax break. You guys can holler about conservative values but can't count.
Cats .I've made that connection here before in the taxi medallion schemes. Once in the country someone could save until they could purchase a car ...put a taxi sign on the roof ;and be an independent business person. Now that same person needs to become an employee to get a job driving a car,and can almost never hope to advance beyond .
Unions stifle individual achievement . Suddenly seniority counts more than merit .Overachieving on the job is discouraged .Quote:
Originally Posted by talaniman
Your spin is wasted on a union member Tom. It's a false narrative. No merit based in fact. Just repeating talking points.
In NY, yes. In Illinois, not so much. My husband could keep you up all night with stories about the CWA in NY.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomder55
Despite having been in a Union almost 2/3 of my working life... I'm not going to defend them because I've seen so much of their protecting their friends at the expense of others paying the same dues I really lost any trust in them that I ever had... which wasn't abundent to begin with.
I didn't have a choice... the job was a closed shop... if I wanted it , I had to join. It was a bad time of the year to get a job After fiscal years ended, but before they really had the plans and budgets in place for the next... and I needed a job at that time as previous employer went belly up..
It wasn't all bad though either... they did do a few good things , but really I wouldn't even call it a wash. Certain Unions should not exist..or be allowed to exist. Federal and State and local workers for one.....Police and Emergency workers for another. And Above all Teachers.....shouldn't have a union.
THey did spectacularly well up until roughly 35 years ago until the PC crap started being more important than teaching the important stuff that kids NEED to know in the world.
you must think I have no experience on this . See WG's comment . What she says about NY is true . I also have experiences in states with right to work rules.Quote:
Originally Posted by talaniman
So why didn't you get out??Quote:
Despite having been in a Union almost 2/3 of my working life... I'm not going to defend them because I've seen so much of their protecting their friends at the expense of others paying the same dues I really lost any trust in them that I ever had
After 20 years... I've earned a rather significant severance package. Like many others... When I get my package... I'm banking it and moving on to the next employer... I've got 4 or 5 lined up right now.Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedKarma
Your severance package is a negotiated benefit of being in a union, as was mine.
Money talks, that's why unions exist. You stayed because it worked for you.Quote:
After 20 years... I've earned a rather significant severance package.
I doubt that.Quote:
moving on to the next employer... I've got 4 or 5 lined up right now.
Severance packages are also part of the non-union part of the company as well. Its not just unions that have them. But because they are negotiated... there will be some degree of difference in the amount. Every non-union place I worked at previously had severance packages based on your length of service.Quote:
Originally Posted by talaniman
Yeah.. well I Learned decades ago... you do what's best for you... thats what everyone else does.Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedKarma
Doubt all you want... I've got an open offer at three different employers already... and a couple more I've got a really good shot at, good enough to be considered a sure thing.
It helps to have a skill set that not a lot of people have, and significant experience to back it up that is in demand in my area... and it helps to know the right people, I've had a standing offer from one of those employers for the last 5 years. I've known the CEO for the last 17 years. He's said they will create an opening for me if I want it, and when I need it.
That severance package would pay for a rather well equipped brand new Corvette convertible and a few years worth of insurance if I didn't plan on investing it towards retirement. There is a significant finacial encintive to hang around until I have it in hand.
So why are you always criticizing what other people do?Quote:
Yeah.. well I Learned decades ago... you do what's best for you... thats what everyone else does.
Some people go WAYYYYY overboard when they do it. And break existing laws. When Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Ried get rich over years doing exactly what Martha Stewart went to jail for doing just once (and I'm no fan of hers either)....yeah..lets just say I've got a reason to complain.Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedKarma
I'll type slowly for you:Quote:
When Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Ried get rich over years
THEY ALL DO IT. IT'S NOT ONLY ONE PARTY.
The Union Advantage: Facts and Figures
How unions help all workers | Economic Policy Institute
Union questions auto execs' pay packages - USATODAY.com
Union Workers Earn More Than Nonunion
Unions, inequality, and faltering middle-class wages | Economic Policy Institute
Facts over fiction and talking points.Quote:
A major factor driving these trends has been the ongoing erosion of unionization and the declining bargaining power of unions, along with the weakened ability of unions to set norms or labor standards that raise the wages of comparable nonunion workers. This preview of the forthcoming The State of Working America, 12th Editionpresents a detailed analysis of the impact of unionization on wages and benefits and on wage inequality. Key findings include:
- The union wage premium—the percentage-higher wage earned by those covered by a collective bargaining contract—is 13.6 percent overall (17.3 percent for men and 9.1 percent for women).
- Unionized workers are 28.2 percent more likely to be covered by employer-provided health insurance and 53.9 percent more likely to have employer-provided pensions.
- From 1973 to 2011, the share of the workforce represented by unions declined from 26.7 percent to 13.1 percent.
- The decline of unions has affected middle-wage men more than any other group and explains about three-fourths of the expanded wage gap between white- and blue-collar men and over a fifth of the expanded wage gap between high school– and college-educated men from 1978 to 2011.
- An expanded analysis that includes the direct and norm-setting impact of unions shows that deunionization can explain about a third of the entire growth of wage inequality among men and around a fifth of the growth among women from 1973 to 2007.
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Ried BOTH were not rich when they got into office... but accumulated wealth far beyond what they earned through insider trading... and they earned almost their entire wealth from it. Nancy Pelosis husbands business depends on being steered insider information and contracts from her.Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedKarma
Its not like they earned it working before they got into office... like a lot of others actually did... They were just the worst offenders, and the most pompous a s s e s of the bunch.
Just more proof they should be held to the same laws adn the same standards everyone else is.
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:25 AM. |