I guess it's your genre. We KNOW you read porn because you just admitted to it, and it would be a strange thing to testify to on a message board, but I guess that's how liberal dems do things? Sorry to disappoint you, but I did not. Now that was largely because I had no access to it, and for that I am eternally grateful. But I'm just glad to read that you now admit it is porn. A few months ago you tried to suggest it was not, perhaps believing it ranked up there with Shakespeare?
One thing I believe we can say for sure. If DJT had written it, you would call it porn with a capital P, but since you don't despise SA, then it is "soft" porn. Is it "soft" porn only when liberal dems write it? Is that how you determine the difference?