Quote:

---

Doing well is not my purpose

---

Then wouldn't you need to change your purpose?

I don't care about the president's virus problem. He's just one more amongst millions to catch this illness. It has no political meaning at all.

still flying in circles I see

Of course the dufus has all kinds of shady deals to help him along. Legal? Maybe NOT!

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...-2016-nyt-says

https://www.palmerreport.com/analysi...ampaign/33012/

He better hurry up and pardon himself.

Oh my gosh!! "Unusual payments"???

As to the second article, it is headed by this. Donate $25 now to help Palmer Report's editorial takedown of Donald Trump:

So is this what you call using an unbiased source?

And you are, you must remember, the same guy who had no problems with Mr. Obama lying to the whole world about the deaths of 4 Americans in Benghazi. So it just makes all of this rumor-mongering a little hard to take seriously.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

I don't care about the president's virus problem...It has no political meaning at all.

---

No, nothing political. After all, he's just our president....

Being sick is not about politics. I'm sure he ate dinner last night. That is also not about politics.

Just more TDS.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

Oh my gosh!! "Unusual payments"???

As to the second article, it is headed by this. Donate $25 now to help Palmer Report's editorial takedown of Donald Trump:

So is this what you call using an unbiased source?

And you are, you must remember, the same guy who had no problems with Mr. Obama lying to the whole world about the deaths of 4 Americans in Benghazi. So it just makes all of this rumor-mongering a little hard to take seriously.

---

Threw that 2nd link in just for you as I had a choice of DOZENS! Your noun, verb, and Benghazi...blame it on Obama was expected and nothing new.

Choice of dozens of liberal, biased, TDS driven sites? No doubt true. And still don’t care about 4 dead Americans which is sad.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

Choice of dozens of liberal, biased, TDS driven sites? No doubt true. And still don’t care about 4 dead Americans which is sad.

---

What about the 200,000+ who have died in the US from the coronavirus?

I think he Chicoms should be held responsible.

I think terrorists should be held responsible for Benghazi.

How are you going to do that? bomb Tripoli? bomb Benghazi? that boat has sailed, the time for retaliation has passed, terrorists died in the attack

Some were arrested tried and imprisoned too. Unlike the dufus who lets the terrorist in Niger off the hook, and Vlad putting bounties on our troops, and Saudis murdering Americans. Nothing from the right about any of that.

Quote:

---

I think terrorists should be held responsible for Benghazi.

---

Might want to call Obama and let him know they were terrorists. He was confused about that.

Obama called it an act of terror so how does that differ from terrorist attack?

Except that he sent S. Rice to say it was NOT a terrorist attack. How do you explain that?

That's what the preliminary intel report was. She stated that also but listening is not the right wing loony strong point because you're to busy whining and hollering your own noise. You never even bothered to read what was going on at MANY of the embassies around the world in the days before the Benghazi attack.

Do you loons even listen to yourself? If you did you would at least acknowledge your own lunacy and not just everybody else's. I submit as evidence all your lunatic postings on this forum.

Quote:

---

That's what the preliminary intel report was. She stated that also but listening is not the right wing loony strong point because you're to busy whining and hollering your own noise.

---

If that's what the "preliminary intel" was, then why didn't Obama say that in the Rose Garden several days earlier? Why were the two statements so different?

In other news, what a relief!! Biden is not actually running for president, he's running for the Senate. Whew!!

"You know, we have to come together. That's why I'm running. I'm running as a proud Democrat for the Senate,"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

If that's what the "preliminary intel" was, then why didn't Obama say that in the Rose Garden several days earlier? Why were the two statements so different?

---

I thought I gave you this link before of what she actually said.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/week...3#.UKQD2GfSnpg

Your right wing version seems to be the one that's different.

Since you didn't answer, I'll ask again. If that's what the "preliminary intel" was, then why didn't Obama say that in the Rose Garden several days earlier? Why were the two statements so different?