I'm not dumb enough to believe anything the dufus says, or shocked when he lies, cheats, and steals. I rather expect that of him. He has not failed in that regard either.Quote:
Originally Posted by paraclete
|
I'm not dumb enough to believe anything the dufus says, or shocked when he lies, cheats, and steals. I rather expect that of him. He has not failed in that regard either.Quote:
Originally Posted by paraclete
I wonder how shocked you were at Obama's lying and cheating?Quote:
or shocked when he lies, cheats, and steals.
Stop wondering, because the sheer volume of the dufus untruths and deviousness is unmatched in the history of man and that's just counting his 3 years in office so far...without adding his stupid tweets.
Sure it is. Greater than all the history of man!! Hmmm. I’m afraid you’ve gone off the deep end.
Obama is history. Now is what matters.Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
ah the yesteryears
It didn’t matter to you when he was in office, so your protests ring hollow now.
And you know that how?Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
Because you absolutely refuse to be honest about him now. It’s plain.
I like Ike.
Hauling you into 2020, Trump is the president and currect topic.
Like I said. Your refusal of honesty gives you away.
I have absolutely NO clue what you mean by that.Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
I think you do.
If you're talking about Obama, then I say, "WHO???" He's history. I was too busy with personal and health problems to be swooning over him.Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
I guess so.
a lot of rear gunners around here. you do know that rear gunners never see where they are going?
If it was so bad that we lefties let Obama get away with so much as you keep saying, then explain why is it okay for the right to let the dufus get away with just as much, and even more?
So you agree that it was bad for you lefties to let Obama, "get away with so much"? Well, at least that's some progress being made.
No I don't agree at all. I simply asked a question. It is you who calls the lefts behavior toward Obama bad, certainly not I. Why is your behavior toward the dufus any better?
That's what is wrong with your approach. You love Obama, so you wouldn't let wild horses drag a negative comment about him out of your mouth. You hate Trump, so you refuse to acknowledge anything positive about him. It's that inconsistency that I object to. Your moral outrage makes no impression because of it.
Now to answer your question, it is certainly not OK for conservatives to allow Trump to "get away with" illegal behavior. However, at some point you have to actually come up with illegal behavior. We've gone through a bogus impeachment hearing and a bogus Atlantic article. You've come up with nothing, but you want to continue your whining campaign against the pres in the hope that you can get Biden elected. That's thoroughly dishonest, and that's why I call you out on it.
I don't remember you or the RWing saying positive things about Obama, quite the opposite, so is that hate for Obama? Why do you expect the left to do what you didn't do? That was the question.Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
So we are dishonest for whining about the dufus, but it's okay for you to whine about Biden, and that's not thoroughly dishonest? If you can be partisan why can't we? Your approach has as many flaws as mine does. We both want our guys elected. Your inconsistent moral outrage is as partisan as mine. Mine is just a lot more CURRENT!Quote:
Now to answer your question, it is certainly not OK for conservatives to allow Trump to "get away with" illegal behavior. However, at some point you have to actually come up with illegal behavior. We've gone through a bogus impeachment hearing and a bogus Atlantic article. You've come up with nothing, but you want to continue your whining campaign against the pres in the hope that you can get Biden elected. That's thoroughly dishonest, and that's why I call you out on it.
You can whine all you want. No problem with that. But it's the holier than thou pontificating about Trump's supposedly illegal behavior that should be backed up by some evidence.
Partisanship? Maybe. I'd probably be more likely to refer to it as issues based voting. I'll vote for anyone of either party that will agree to appoint fed judges who believe in interpreting law rather than making laws up, and who can help maintain a healthy economy. I would add something about a balanced budget, but that is presently hopeless. We'll just have to learn the hard way.
Nobody here has a more holier than thou attitude than thee, but so what? It's yours to have and no big deal for me.
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:16 PM. |