Ask Me Help Desk

Ask Me Help Desk (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forum.php)
-   Current Events (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forumdisplay.php?f=486)
-   -   WHO are the job creators? (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/showthread.php?t=580718)

  • Jul 27, 2011, 12:37 PM
    talaniman

    They have plenty to trickle down, but the redistribution of wealth was the slickest magic trick I have ever seen. I mean all the things they accuse progressives of, and the Prez, they have been doing a long time, and we just sat and watched.

    Maybe this is a wake up call for people to take their country back from greedy corporations. Now lets see who should I vote for??
  • Aug 1, 2011, 07:42 AM
    speechlesstx
    Obama's economy is even worse than previously thought. And yes, it is HIS economy in spite of the fact that the left is still blaming Bush.

    Quote:

    GDP Report Shatters Illusion of Jobless, Productivity-Packed Recovery
    By Derek Thompson

    Jul 29 2011, 12:59 PM ET 80
    It's hard to overstate how much today's GDP report blew up our understanding of the recovery. The recession was deeper than we knew, and the economy is weaker than we thought. We weren't making new jobs, because we weren't making new things, period. The economy grew less than 1% in the first half of 2011.

    Yesterday, analysts thought the economy was expanding by 2.5% a year. This morning, they learned GDP grew by only 1.6% in the last four quarters. This is a remarkable discovery. It's the difference between thinking we're expanding at a decent, if disappointing, pace, and knowing we're growing around half our historical norm.

    Analysts also thought, as recently as twelve hours ago, that the economy declined 6.8% and 4.9% in the quarters bisected by Obama's inauguration. It turns out the actual declines were much steeper: 8.9% and 6.7%.

    To adopt the president's favorite metaphor of the ditch and the driver: The ditch was a 33% deeper than we thought. And we're driving 33% slower than we hoped. Take a look at these graphs, via Economist, to soak it in:


    And what about productivity? The silver lining of the recession had been that, with output climbing and employment flat, American workers were extending their lead over the rest of the world by supercharging productivity gains, which could pay off during the recovery. But now that the output numbers have been corrected, we have to change the story. Michael Mandel, an Atlantic columnist, writes on his personal blog:

    Until this morning, the official data showed that the U.S. productivity growth accelerated during the financial crisis. Nonfarm business productivity growth supposedly went from a 1.2% annual rate in 2005-2007, to a 2.3% annual rate in 2007-2009. Many commentators suggested that this productivity gain, in the face of great disruptions, showed the flexibility of the U.S. economy.

    Uh, oh. The latest revision of the national income accounts, released this morning, makes the whole productivity acceleration vanish. Nonfarm business productivity growth in the 2007-09 period has now been cut almost in half, down to only 1.4% per year

    Illusion, the perfect choice of words to describe everything Obama. How about those jobs Mr. President?
  • Aug 1, 2011, 10:04 AM
    talaniman

    Where is the republican input on jobs? They are so busy destroying government, they haven't even mentioned how to create jobs. You can't just blame one person and let the rest off the hook. According to you, he isn't supposed to create jobs, job creators are.
  • Aug 1, 2011, 10:14 AM
    speechlesstx
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    Where is the republican input on jobs?

    Senate Republican Jobs Plan

    Quote:

    They are so busy destroying government, they haven't even mentioned how to create jobs. You can't just blame one person and let the rest off the hook.
    It was the president and his media accomplices that made the debt ceiling the only "crisis" being discussed.

    Quote:

    According to you, he isn't supposed to create jobs, job creators are.
    I give credit where credit is due. He's the one that claimed his porkulus bill "saved or created" some three million jobs, so let him defend it.
  • Aug 1, 2011, 01:58 PM
    talaniman

    We can argue it wasn't enough, but we have to also acknowledge that the right is no help at all. Funny how the ones screaming about what a waste it was went home and took credit for the results, and gladly so. Just look at Perry taking credit for jobs the stimulus created, and is still creating.
  • Aug 4, 2011, 01:30 PM
    speechlesstx
    Further evidence that businesses are afraid to do anything because of the uncertainty created by this administration.

    Quote:

    Businesses are not comfortable hiring, taking on new projects, or doing much of anything because they have no way to predict what kinds of policies politicians will enact over the next couple of years and the effect those policies will have on them. What I’ve been hearing over the past week from major investors in the markets in New York is that to a man, CEOs and others with whom they speak regularly are frightened and paralyzed when it comes to new projects.
    Have no fear though, Superman is going to take a taxpayer funded bus tour (campaign trip) through middle America as he "pivots to jobs" for the 15th time.
  • Aug 4, 2011, 01:39 PM
    Synnen

    Heh.

    Try to work for a proprietary school right now.

    We can't go forward with ANYTHING, because the rules and regulations from the DOE are subject to change practically every MINUTE
  • Aug 4, 2011, 01:43 PM
    speechlesstx

    Another good reason to abolish the DOE.
  • Aug 4, 2011, 01:47 PM
    Synnen

    /shrug... the DOE does good things.

    Let's get rid of the double standard for proprietary schools versus state schools, though.

    It's like any other business out there---the organizations that oversee it are part of the lobbying/moneymaking in Washington DC.

    Just like part of the reason health care is so expensive is because of the AMA.
  • Aug 4, 2011, 02:40 PM
    speechlesstx
    While the president pivots to jobs for the 15th time, before he gets ready to "save or create" millions more jobs, his press secretary handed Republicans a new slogan: "the White House doesn't create jobs."

    I wish they'd make up their mind.

    P.S. Someone give Jake Tapper a show of his own.
  • Aug 4, 2011, 03:21 PM
    excon
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    Businesses are not comfortable hiring, taking on new projects, or doing much of anything because they have no way to predict what kinds of policies politicians will enact over the next couple of years and the effect those policies will have on them.

    Hello again, Steve:

    That is the STUPIDEST thing I've EVER read about businessmen...

    Let me see... I've got this NEW idea that's going to make MY business run better, but I'm NOT going to institute it because of policies that MIGHT be instigated?? Really?? Let me see. I've got this great NEW product I want to introduce, but I'm not going to because I'm worried about NATIONAL POLICIES??

    Let me say again, that is the STUPIDEST thing I've ever read... The businessmen that DO what your STUPID writer said they're going to do, are going to go BROKE real fast!

    excon
  • Aug 4, 2011, 03:45 PM
    Synnen

    Excon,

    Love you, but you're wrong here.

    We will NOT institute new policies and ideas right now because of the high costs involved in making those changes... and we KNOW the government is looking at changing the rules on how our specific business is going to be able to operate going forward.

    It would be INCREDIBLY stupid to implement new policies and ideas right now for us, because the odds are that we'll have to reverse those decisions in less than a year... and then all of that money will have been spent for NOTHING.

    I'm betting OTHER types of businesses are feeling the SAME way as my business.
  • Aug 4, 2011, 05:20 PM
    talaniman

    Uncertainty is a fancy word for FEAR, and fearful people make some crazy decisions. They are high risk business people. Doesn't matter who you blame YOUR fear on, its still yours to deal with. If you think you have a good plan or idea, have some courage and make it happen, and don't wait for someone to approve or disapprove it. That's crazy. That's not business. Now if you depend on DOE, or a bank or some other entity, well check with them and don't just sit in fear and do nothing. That's crazy. As you can see, this uncertainty crap is a smoke screen, because everyone who hollers uncertainty is already making loot hand over fist. The true job creators sit home because they are uncertain about a job, and the lending is so tight, because BIG banks don't lend to SMALL banks, and that's who lends to the majority of small business. Well guess who supports SMALL business, yep that's right, consumers with jobs, and a few bucks to spend. Those are facts, but uncertainty is easier to explain than DEMAND.

    And what does Jakes grilling of the White House spokesman got to do with anything?

    Oh back to uncertainty,

    Quote:

    And I can prove it and I could spend the next 3 hours giving you examples of all of us in this market place that are frightened to death about all the new regulations, our health care costs escalate, regulations coming from left and right.”
    Lets not forget where this uncertainty came from, rich people screwing up the economy. Till then, nobody gave a rats patoot about the debt, the deficit, regulations, or anything else except making and spending money. So blame your uncertainty on whatever you want. Live in all the fear you want. If you weren't doing the right things before you found out you were robbed, then you probably aren't going to do the right things after, if you didn't learn from the mistakes made before.

    You can start by NOT listening to any fool that says we have a spending problem, and a debt problem, because all you have to do is Google 1936 recession, and see we have been down this road before, and it wasn't WWII that saved us then. Also see who was saying no, and watering down the stimulus back then. HMM!! No wonder there is uncertainty, because repeating mistakes would make me afraid too.
  • Aug 5, 2011, 06:41 AM
    speechlesstx
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by excon View Post
    Hello again, Steve:

    That is the STUPIDEST thing I've EVER read about businessmen...

    I can't help it if you refuse to listen to what they're saying.
  • Aug 5, 2011, 06:45 AM
    speechlesstx
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    And what does Jakes grilling of the White House spokesman got to do with anything??

    Um, everything. Someone in the mainstream media is holding the president accountable for all his bluster about jobs. Attaboy Jake!
  • Aug 5, 2011, 06:53 AM
    excon
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    I can't help it if you refuse to listen to what they're saying.

    Hello again, Steve:

    What "THEY'RE" saying?? Why listen to what THEY say?? I'M a businessman. I'm one of THEM. If I listened to other businessmen, I'd be BROKE. I'm successful because I listen to ME. And, I'll tell you again how I run my business. When I see an opportunity in the market place, I TAKE it. I DON'T consider the political climate. I DON'T consider what the Wall Street Journal says. I don't consider what pundits say. I don't consider how much tax I'm going to have to pay on my profit. I only HOPE there's a profit to pay taxes on.

    But, that's just me..

    excon
  • Aug 5, 2011, 07:52 AM
    speechlesstx
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by excon View Post
    What "THEY'RE" saying???? Why listen to what THEY say??? I'M a businessman. I'm one of THEM. If I listened to other businessmen, I'd be BROKE. I'm successful because I listen to ME. And, I'll tell you again how I run my business. When I see an opportunity in the market place, I TAKE it.

    You keep saying that.

    No one quit doing business. No one is avoiding opportunities. That's why casinos are investing in Macau, that's where the opportunities are at the moment. If this administration wasn't such a "wet blanket" they'd be investing here, but this administration would rather Brazil drill for oil than the U.S.

    I mean what don't you get? Tal and a gazillion other liberals keep whining about corporations sending jobs overseas. Well, what the heck is their incentive to expand in the U.S. under the current uncertainty over regulations, getting a boot on your neck for daring to tell the truth about what Obama policies are doing, or being punished for creating jobs as Boeing is? Hmmm??

    They're going to do what they can to keep making money and taking advantage of opportunities, but where they're welcome, not where they're threatened by the heavy hand of this administration. That means no jobs for us.
  • Aug 5, 2011, 08:09 AM
    excon
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    I mean what don't you get? Tal and a gazillion other liberals keep whining about corporations sending jobs overseas.

    They're going to do what they can to keep making money and taking advantage of opportunities, but where they're welcome, not where they're threatened by the heavy hand of this administration. That means no jobs for us.

    Hello again, Steve:

    You're right in the macro - wrong in the micro (or vice versa? ) I don't whine about corporations. They do what they do, and owe NO allegiance to the US. I don't have a problem with that. I AM that.

    Where you're wrong is, it's NOT Obama or his policies. It's the free trade policies started under Reagan and exacerbated by Clinton. THAT'S where the problem is. But, THAT'S cool, too, because we have the ability to SHIFT our economy to stay ahead of the world. At least, we USED to.

    When the Japanese successfully attacked our car industry, we developed the computer industry. When China and Mexico and the rest of the world HAS, what USED to be our manufacturing industry, we need to SHIFT again. That only happens WITH government support. The computer industry got is seed FROM government. Our NEXT industry will too, if you right wingers would get out of the way.

    This is NOT a time to cut education. This is NOT a time to let our bridges fail. This is NOT a time to CUT subsidy's to companies that CAN foment the next industrial revolution. The Wright Brothers days are long past.

    excon
  • Aug 5, 2011, 08:40 AM
    speechlesstx

    That's all great, ex, but the only "industrial revolution" that this administration is friendly to is a "green" revolution and that's a farce. Otherwise he's created a HOSTILE business environment and he will continue to FAIL at contributing to a growth environment as long as he does so.
  • Aug 5, 2011, 08:46 AM
    Wondergirl
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    That's all great, ex, but the only "industrial revolution" that this administration is friendly to is a "green" revolution and that's a farce. Otherwise he's created a HOSTILE business environment and he will continue to FAIL at contributing to a growth environment as long as he does so.

    I'm sure the tax credits the federal government will give to businesses that hire unemployed vets won't help the economy.
  • Aug 5, 2011, 08:52 AM
    excon
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    That's all great, ex, but the only "industrial revolution" that this administration is friendly to is a "green" revolution and that's a farce.

    Hello again, Steve:

    Speaking as a businessman, I see NOTHING farcical about energy, or the JILLIONS to be made when the investments pan out. And, I have no doubt that they WILL pan out, because NEED is the engine of prosperity. Plus, I'm not ready to move into a yurt.

    Besides, you, yourself complain about how much money the Goricle is making from it. What? You think that's the ONLY opportunity?

    I leave you with this thought... I'm sure way back when, if somebody said that they were going to put transistors on a chip, somebody else called it a farce.

    excon
  • Aug 5, 2011, 09:07 AM
    speechlesstx
    No one can even really define what a "green job" is. This was his bluster in 2008:

    "We'll invest $15 billion a year over the next decade in renewable energy, creating five million new green jobs that pay well, can't be outsourced and help end our dependence on foreign oil."

    How's he doing? So far, $80 billion has been spent on an estimated 225,000 "green jobs" that have been "saved or created" according to his Council of Economic Advisers. That's $355,555 per job if my math is correct. A HUGE waste of taxpayer money. Give me $355,555 and I promise you I can create more than one job.
  • Aug 5, 2011, 09:19 AM
    Wondergirl
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    No one can even really define what a "green job" is.

    Bill Clinton has rattled off a list from time to time. Painting city rooftops white is one of them. City rooftop gardens is another. Urban gardens is another. Want more ideas?

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/newswee...my-stupid.html
  • Aug 5, 2011, 09:21 AM
    excon
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    No one can even really define what a "green job" is. This was his bluster in 2008

    Hello again, Steve:

    Nice change up.

    But, if you'll notice, my posts don't mention Obama or his policies.. Frankly, they represent what I would do, if you put ME in charge. Now, I don't know IF the government will follow my recommendations, or not... But, that's NOT going to stop me from making 'em.

    excon
  • Aug 5, 2011, 09:28 AM
    excon
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Wondergirl View Post
    Want more ideas?

    Hello WG:

    How about hiring a few people to build mirror farms in the desert? Plus, a few smaller ones up North. The sun shines up there too, doesn't it?

    excon
  • Aug 5, 2011, 09:31 AM
    Wondergirl
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by excon View Post
    Hello WG:

    How about hiring a few people to build mirror farms in the desert? Plus, a few smaller ones up North. The sun shines up there too, doesn't it?

    excon

    Tell me more about how that would work. Sounds egotistical.
  • Aug 5, 2011, 09:36 AM
    NeedKarma
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Wondergirl View Post
    Tell me more about how that would work. Sounds egotistical.

    World's Largest Solar Power Plant Coming To CA Mojave Desert | Inhabitat - Green Design Will Save the World
  • Aug 5, 2011, 09:37 AM
    speechlesstx
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by excon View Post
    Nice change up.

    What changeup? It was a continuation of the previous thought.

    Quote:

    But, if you'll notice, my posts don't mention Obama or his policies
    Of course I've noticed. It doesn't change the fact that this administration has been hostile to business.
  • Aug 5, 2011, 09:40 AM
    excon
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Wondergirl View Post
    Tell me more about how that would work. Sounds egotistical.

    Hello again, WG:

    I don't know about ego.. And, I'm using the wrong terminology. I googled mirror farms and it didn't do it.. All I know, is there are power plants in the Southeast desert that use mirrors to concentrate the suns energy to heat up vats of oil that boil water and make steam.. I read that a farm 10 miles by 10 miles could supply enough energy for the entire nation. The problem is that electricity can't be efficiently transported very far. That's why I suggested a few of these plants up north.

    That's all I know, and it ain't much.

    excon
  • Aug 5, 2011, 09:43 AM
    excon

    Hello NK:

    Man, you're Johnny on the spot!

    excon
  • Aug 5, 2011, 09:43 AM
    Wondergirl
    I was afraid cattle and desert creatures would stand in front of the mirrors and admire themselves. :D I'm glad I'm wrong.
  • Aug 5, 2011, 09:49 AM
    excon
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    Of course I've noticed. It doesn't change the fact that this administration has been hostile to business.

    Hello again, Steve:

    Hostile to business?? Dude! If you call making sure the banks don't SCREW their customers any more with those teeny, tiny pieces of paper that they send you in your credit card statement every now and then.. You know the ones.. They're written like that so you DON'T read them. They don't want you to read them, because they're raising your rates or changing your agreement in ways that you WOULDN'T like.

    If you call fixing THAT being hostile to business, sign me up!

    excon
  • Aug 5, 2011, 09:49 AM
    NeedKarma
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Wondergirl View Post
    I was afraid cattle and desert creatures would stand in front of the mirrors and admire themselves. :D I'm glad I'm wrong.

    I wasn't sure if you were making a funny or not. I'd need to hear the inflection in your voice and the smirk on your face. Damn this textual medium! :)
  • Aug 5, 2011, 10:01 AM
    Wondergirl
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by NeedKarma View Post
    I wasn't sure if you were making a funny or not. I'd need to hear the inflection in your voice and the smirk on your face. Damn this textual medium! :)

    I'll virtually smirk and giggle next time. :)
  • Aug 5, 2011, 10:09 AM
    speechlesstx
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by excon View Post
    Hostile to business???

    How about dragging them before Congress for telling the truth about Obamacare consequences? Threatening them with a boot on more than one part of their anatomy? Increased regulation, suing a company for creating jobs, threatening new taxes, slamming CEO's and on and on. The one sector where growth has occurred under Obama is government jobs.

    We've been over this enough, all I did was inform you of what business is saying. If you don't believe them, oh well. If that many businessmen and women say they're holding back because of his policies and the uncertainty, someone should take heed instead of campaign trips across America.
  • Aug 5, 2011, 10:21 AM
    NeedKarma
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    ... all I did was inform you of what business is saying.

    That seems more important to you than what people are saying, being screwed over by insurance companies or not being able to offer any health insurance at all. Are you more concerned with corporations than people?
  • Aug 5, 2011, 10:37 AM
    speechlesstx
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by NeedKarma View Post
    That seems more important to you than what people are saying, being screwed over by insurance companies or not being able to offer any health insurance at all.

    That's the problem with you, NK, you base your opinion of me on assumptions.
    Quote:

    Are you more concerned with corporations than people?
    Right, I'm the one who's been asking people to give a child a chance and you think I'm more concerned abut corporation than people? See? You don't pay attention to what I actually say.

    What I will say is this, a corporation pays my salary and pays 100 percent of my health insurance. I SHOULD be concerned for it, and with the uncertainty Obamacare is creating and the way it's driving up costs I'm concerned I may not have insurance in the next year or two.
  • Aug 5, 2011, 11:02 AM
    speechlesstx
    Here you go. Unlike the guy that robbed a bank because he needed health care, the guy who hoped he'd be shot for scaling the White House fence because he couldn't find a job seems to have been missed by the major networks.

    Quote:

    WASHINGTON (WUSA) -- The man who jumped a White House fence Tuesday night talked to us Wednesday after a court appearance.

    James Dirk Crudup told 9NEWS the move was a cry for help because he can't find a job in this economy. Crudup says he jumped the fence with partial hopes of being shot by police because he has six kids with two women and felt like a deadbeat dad.

    "Any real man would want to provide for their children and in today's economy it is so hard that especially when you have labors you can not make those achievements and the ridicule that I received and feel, you can't imagine," said Crudup.
    As he president pivots to jobs for the 15th time maybe his "singular focus" on jobs could start with this fellow.
  • Aug 5, 2011, 11:55 AM
    talaniman

    He wouldn't have to keep pivoting to jobs if the congress would do there job. We wouldn't be unemployed if the job creators would do there jobs, and we would have to blame one person if everybody was working instead of whining, especially the job creators who are complaining about uncertainty, who didn't whisper a peep about uncertainty when they tanked the economy, and are still making money hand over fist. Yeah they would be who I would listen to, (sarcasm)!!

    So you whine about one guy whose trying, and keep giving money to the guy that really screwed you, and keeps screwing you, because fact is your paycheck is still the same as it was 15 years ago when your job creators ran overseas, and started creating jobs there. And still are.

    Simply amazing how you rather put down one lousy guy who is trying to put a band aid on your booty for 3 freakin' years, because they one you worshiped has been screwing you for 15 YEARS. Fact is if it weren't for the Tea party, and republicans (right wing ones not the ones who have sense, and can see beyond their own nose), this recession would be behind us.

    Now you can sit and be satisfied with the way things were done, but sooner or later you will have to evolve and grow to a better way of doing things. Doing nothing is not an option, and just so you know, Gore isn't the only on investing in a GREEN future, all the energy money guys are. Just ask T Boone Pickens what he is doing with his tax break money. Texas has more wind farms than any state, except California, but repubs are sitting on all his infrastructure, and grid upgrades. All you righties know is whine, obstruct, and blame every body but yourselves.

    Too bad we ain't buying it no more. Now shut up and let us put that band aid on your butt, so we can debate about doing more, not less.

    I got even more on the hypocrisy of your health care position, but that can wait.
  • Aug 5, 2011, 12:21 PM
    speechlesstx
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by talaniman View Post
    Too bad we ain't buying it no more. Now shut up and let us put that band aid on your butt, so we can debate about doing more, not less.

    Tell me how you really feel, tal. And while you're at it, whine about how Democrats thought more minorities should own homes so they forced lenders to loan money to people who weren't credit-worthy. Then you can whine about Democrats who repeatedly ignored Bush's 17 warnings about Freddie and Fannie and said NOTHING was wrong with them.

    P.S. I wouldn't whine about one guy had it not been for the constant beating you guys gave Bush over jobs, Obama's repeated bluster about all the jobs he's "saved or created," the 5 million "green jobs" he's going to create, the joke that was "recovery summer," the stupid claims about how the economy is turning around and the fact they're still blaming Bush.

  • All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:16 PM.