I think most dems are clear we are referring to some rich elites as worshipping profits and are greedy. They sure aren't thinking about those rural poor folks are they?
![]() |
I think most dems are clear we are referring to some rich elites as worshipping profits and are greedy. They sure aren't thinking about those rural poor folks are they?
"It is important to understand the Republicans are basically a monolithic block worshiping profits and greed."Quote:
I think most dems are clear we are referring some rich elites as worshipping profits and are greedy.
Hmm.
Politics make strange bedfellows. Both parties are made up of groups with agendas. The dufus has subverted the republican party. Or polluted and corrupted it for his own agenda.
As opposed to the absolute moral purity of the democrats??? Please. No one is going to buy that. The whole "Green New Deal" lunacy is proof of that. The democrats have accepted an idea concocted by a very dumb and idealistic young person which would completely bankrupt the country and even then accomplish but very little. If I was Trump, I'd make AOC and her buddies the face of the democratic party. I'd run ads with her face and words on them constantly, and then remind everyone that the democrat candidates for pres have bought into her nonsense.Quote:
The dufus has subverted the republican party. Or polluted and corrupted it for his own agenda.
He had help lots of it and all repubs wanted at least the behind the scenes power elite was to shrink government and run their own agenda which is to do as they please, and that's what they got.
The country will be bankrupt all right but not from AOC or any of those young idealists. I see you adopt the spin of the dufus noise machine.
The Republican philosophy of endless greed and acquisition is always couched in platitudes designed to hide their true motivations. They were dog whistling and gaslighting long before those terms were in common usage. There have always been exceptions - Eisenhower, McCain, etc.
If you really think that's true then you plainly don't know the first thing about the Green New Deal.Quote:
The country will be bankrupt all right but not from AOC or any of those young idealists. I see you adopt the spin of the dufus noise machine.
Neither do you, since it was just an idea, and not a plan. Of course you vilify it, and her since you see her as a threat to your agenda and disrupts your status quo. The dufus plans to make her the face of the dems to further add to the fear of minorities taking over your country. That seems to be enough to justify the cruel words and actions directed at them.
You deny his dog whistles and racism, so you are not tarnished by that brush. Too Late! You laid down with the dog and now you have his fleas!
It has been put before the House as a resolution, so it IS a plan.Quote:
Neither do you, since it was just an idea, and not a plan.
https://www.npr.org/2019/02/07/69199...w-deal-outline
A non binding resolution to be discussed and debated and could take YEARS to formulate. I thought you liked a great economy and plenty of jobs for your grandkids and their kids?
To call such a resolution a mere "idea" is ridiculous. You might as well admit it. It is a plan in every sense of the word. Does it contain every detail? No, but no plan starts off by covering every detail.Quote:
A non binding resolution to be discussed and debated and could take YEARS to formulate.
To call the 14 page resolution presented before the house, which was filled with specific goals and many steps to take, simply an "idea" is completely wrong. Tal's initial comment concerned an "idea". You need to learn to read more carefully. He only wanted to run to the non-binding resolution story when it became obvious that it was ridiculous to call that an "idea".Quote:
You brought up the Green New Deal and called it a plan.
Where did I say otherwise? Tal's statement was, "Neither do you, since it was just an idea, and not a plan." And my reply was, and remains, that to call a 14 page house resolution an "idea" is ridiculous political speech. A plan is "a specific project or definite purpose". Yep, it's a plan.Quote:
He called the Green New Deal an idea. YOU called it a plan. Tal referred to the non-binding resolution as just that.
His "idea" referred to the Green New Deal, -NOT the resolution. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Then YOU referred to the resolution as a PLAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Geezawmighty!!! You really really really need to slow down and read. And stop with the silly who said what!
STAY WITH THE ISSUE WHATEVER IT MAY BE!!!! You have a habit of doing this and it gets us nowhere. A touch here and there is ok, but don't go overboard.
Adding exclamation marks does not prove your point.Quote:
His "idea" referred to the Green New Deal, -NOT the resolution. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Then YOU referred to the resolution as a PLAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Geezawmighty!!! You really really really need to slow down and read. And stop with the silly who said what!
STAY WITH THE ISSUE WHATEVER IT MAY BE!!!! You have a habit of doing this and it gets us nowhere. A touch here and there is ok, but don't go overboard.
The resolution identifies itself as the Green New Deal. The resolution is a plan. I was the one who brought it up and Tal tried to excuse it as simply an "idea" to make it, I guess, more politically acceptable. But have it anyway you want. It's a stupid idea/plan that will bankrupt the country.
I give up. You win.
I LIKE exclamation points!!!!!
Evidently so.Quote:
I LIKE exclamation points!!!!!
Call it a plan or call it an idea. I don't care, but you really should read it to see what that non-thinking person is suggesting we do. It would be a nightmare. Just about every democrat running for pres has endorsed it with the possible exception of Biden.
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:34 AM. |