I wasn't mocking you personally. You have your finger on more political pulses than I do. I happen to feel defensive about this one for some reason.
So Obama is more open about attacks than Bush was. Bush struck me as someone who didn't even know when he was being attacked (or even when the twin towers were being attacked). He went through life being handed Yale and politics and the CIA and oil and it was easier for him to not care because someone else was always taking care of it for him.
In the larger view I see Democrats as all about being open (transparency, blah blah) and Republicans as being secretive. Republicans are secretive about everything from big banks to invisible cloaks.
For this matter at hand, it's down to open snitching vs. secretive intel gathering, sensitive president vs. couldn't care less president. The first uses the internet for free, the second used everyone from the CIA, FBI, NSA, SS, and who knows who else to gather the same info, using a lot more sophisticated means at taxpayer expense.
Snitch or intel, which is your preference?