Photo IDs don't HAVE to be drivers licenses. In fact EVERY state issues Photo ID's to non-drivers and always have. I bet if they needed to see a Doctor they would get out of that house fast enough...
![]() |
Hello again, Carol:
I appreciate your efforts.. But, smoothy will NEVER understand the community that you're talking about. He's no different than the other right wingers here, though. There's NO empathy there - NONE.
OR, they know very well what community it is and they don't WANT them to vote. What do you think?
excon
I know its hard but it helps to read what's already been discussed before bringing it up again. And how much fraud can you prove? I say none on our side, but loads on yours, and your side still lost.
Just for the record, the boys smacked the pack. After your snooze of course.
I mean't Week 10.
We're all just fighting for second anyway.
Practising for the playoffs.
You mean the community of illegals, Felons, Dead people and those that feel they are entitled to vote as many times as they can get away with?
Because you can't do much of anything without a legal ID... there is NO reason someone too lazy to get one should be allowed to vote until they can prove they are who they claim.
She's due for a a$$ kicking... she mocks me for getting a trophy for beating her by 1 pt last time.
Tightening standards is only going to solve one problem. As Tom is right when he points out that things are only going to get worse with the advent of electronic voting. Voter I.D. will be irrelevant when it comes to electronic fraud.
Anyway. I get the message. If your system is ideologically sound but dysfunctional when it comes to delivering a proper result then there is nothing that can be done. There other option that seems popular is to talk around the problem.
Tut
What they need is a good ole about of proportional representation
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:34 AM. |