 |
Seems hypocritical of you to be so happy and enthusiastic to see these guys prosecuted, and yet when we know without question that HC destroyed evidence, you are fine with letting her walk. Strange. As I frequently say, it's all about politics.Quote:
yet like JL, still want to prosecute the so called process crimes of Hillary.
Evidence of what exactly? You don't know do you?
I know exactly what it was and so does everyone else not blinded by liberal bias. She destroyed, by great effort, half of the data on her toy email server which the feds wanted. It could not be any plainer.
She destroyed evidence of what?Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
Well, since she destroyed it, then it would be kind of hard to know what it would have been evidence of. I'm sure it was OK since, after all, she said it was. So we'll never know, will we? But they were able to recover enough to know that she had classified material on her toy server, which is a violation of federal law. I'm sure that when AG Lynch met with Bill Clinton for nearly an hour in private, they did not discuss any of those issues, and the decision to not charge HC four days later had no connection with the meeting.Quote:
She destroyed evidence of what?
How much of this garbage are you prepared to put up with?? Once again, it's all about politics. She supported gay marriage and abortion, so most libs did not care what she did wrong.
Quote:
I find it amusing you defend the wrong doing of these career criminals and con men, yet like JL, still want to prosecute the so called process crimes of Hillary
destroying State dept classified material is not in the league of a process crime . It is more like treason .
Since we haven't seen the classified emails she destroyed then that would be hard to answer. That she destroyed emails that belonged to the State Dept from a server she was illegally using is in itself a felony . But if I was to guess ,it was probably evidence of the pay to play scheme she was using in her position as Sec State enriching the Clinton crime family and laundering the bribes through the Clinton Foundation. That would be a good guess. Under the radar ;multiple FBI offices have been running a pay for play investigation for about a year now .Quote:
She destroyed evidence of what?
tal ;revelations about Comey admittedly watering down his report about Evita's server and conduct at State ;and that he came to a conclusion before any witnesses were questioned will undoubtedly be revisiting by the new Justice Dept regime now that the old guard is finally being shown the door . At this point Evita will probably argue the statute of limitations has passed .
Another unbelievable comment from one who so prizes evidence.Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
Ahhh, the REAL reason HC is so hated by the loony right.Quote:
She supported gay marriage and abortion.
You're not thinking. Yes, I prize evidence, which is why it is alarming that HC destroyed evidence.Quote:
Another unbelievable comment from one who so prizes evidence.
If supporting life and traditional marriage makes me a loon, then I'm loon, but I suspect the shoe is actually on the other foot.
What I don't understand is why we are discussing old accusations against Hilliary, proven or otherwise, when this thread is about Trump attitude to journalists
That's what conservatives do here Clete, when they cannot discuss or debate current issues they dredge up old ones. They have been slinging mud at Hillary so long they just can't stop. They fear the pace of a rapidly changing world. I certainly can understand them being overwhelmed right now.
Evita's past is still relevent in this case since it was her campaign that fabricated the allegations .
It's takes a mud-slinger to know a mud-slinger! (<:Quote:
That's what conservatives do here Clete, when they cannot discuss or debate current issues they dredge up old ones. They have been slinging mud at Hillary so long they just can't stop. They fear the pace of a rapidly changing world. I certainly can understand them being overwhelmed right now.
Thank you JL. So true.
https://media2.s-nbcnews.com/j/newsc...3.fit-760w.jpg
I'll have more flexibility once you win the election. How's the dossier sellingwith the FISA court ?
That's pretty good Tom, but didn't conservatives pay to get that dossier started against the dufus before the HC picked it up?
Where did you get that from? And if you link an article, please make it an accurate and pertinent one.Quote:
That's pretty good Tom, but didn't conservatives pay to get that dossier started against the dufus before the HC picked it up?
Hello the thought police have arrived, thou shat have no opinion but mineQuote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
Just shooting for accuracy. You should try it yourself!Quote:
Hello the thought police have arrived, thou shat have no opinion but mine
No I prefer the shotgun approachQuote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
Great answer! It does tend to guarantee at least hitting something.Quote:
No I prefer the shotgun approach
At worst it changes the subjest
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump–Russia_dossierQuote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
In October 2015, Fusion GPS was contracted by conservative political website The Washington Free Beaconto provide political opposition research against Trump. In April 2016, attorney Marc Eliasseparately hired Fusion GPS to investigate Trump on behalf of Hillary Clinton's campaign and the DNC. The Free Beacon stopped its backing when Trump became the presumptive Republican Party presidential nominee.[2] In June 2016, Fusion GPS subcontracted Steele's firm to compile the dossier. His instructions were to seek answers to why Trump would "repeatedly seek to do deals in a notoriously corrupt police state".[9][10][11]
Clinton campaign officials were reportedly unaware that Fusion GPS had subcontracted Steele, and he was not told that the Clinton campaign was the recipient of his research.Following Trump's election as president, funding from Clinton and the DNC ceased, but Steele continued his research and was reportedly paid directly by Fusion GPS co-founderGlenn R. Simpson.[12] The completed dossier was then handed to British and American intelligence services.[13]
So rather clearly the Clinton campaign's attempt to smear Trump was a completely separate undertaking not related to anything the conservative political website The Washington Free Beacon did. So your own article shows that when you said, "didn't conservatives pay to get that dossier started against the dufus before the HC picked it up?", you were simply not correct. One had nothing to do with the other. Also, your article stated the WFB "contacted" Fusion GPS, but nothing was said about contracting with them or paying them, so that also does not support your allegation.Quote:
In April 2016, attorney Marc Elias separately hired Fusion GPS to investigate Trump on behalf of
Hillary Clinton's campaign and the
DNC
I often wonder how carefully you read your own material.
My statement is accurate as posted and what difference does it make? Your nitpicking AGAIN.
Depends. If what you were saying was that there was a largely inconsequential contact by a conservative newspaper with Fusion GPS that amounted basically to nothing, followed by an enormous and completely unrelated (to the conservative contact) investigation funded by the dems using FGPS, then I would agree with you. That is certainly what the Wiki article reported.Quote:
My statement is accurate as posted and what difference does it make? Your nitpicking AGAIN.
I agree the contact would be unrelated to both sides. That was obvious. FGPS must not be that bad if both sides turned to them. According to Wiki,
Fusion GPS is a commercial research and strategic intelligence firm based in Washington, D.C. The company conducts open-source investigations and provides research and strategic advice for businesses, law firms and investors, as well as for political inquiries, such as opposition research. The "GPS" initialism is derived from "Global research, Political analysis, Strategic insight".
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:15 AM. |