All the more reason he should show us the real deal. If he wants to be in control of my money, I want to know how he handles his own.Quote:
Originally Posted by speechlesstx
|
All the more reason he should show us the real deal. If he wants to be in control of my money, I want to know how he handles his own.Quote:
Originally Posted by speechlesstx
Then the rumor-monger should do likewise. Next I expect you'll ask Romney when he stopped beating his wife.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wondergirl
Hello again, Steve:
Why do you protect him when there's a LONG list of real right wing dudes who want him to release his taxes too?? I mean, if this were only the loony left... But, it AIN'T.
You disavow the birther crap, but did you ever call for Obama to release his Harvard records, or his passport, or did you ever wonder WHY Obama is spending MILLIONS to keep his records SEALED??
It IS right wing stuff, after all... I'm not going to go back and look.
excon
Protect? I'm not protecting, I just don't care. If Romney is a tax cheat then let the IRS pursue it, that's their job. You guys all about distraction. Obama says he wants to have “important policy debate” but that seems to amount to discussing Romney's dog.
Carney Asked How Citing Romney Dog Is Part Of Lifting Dialogue
Hello again, Steve:
Democrats won't say BankofAmerica Center? Wait. What?
excon
What, you didn't know? They first called it "Panther Stadium" but didn't get away with that, then they just went to "the stadium." So why won't they call it "Bank of America Stadium?" What are they trying to hide?
"trust but verify" - Ronald Reagan.Quote:
Originally Posted by speechlesstx
You keep quoting that as if it's relevant.Quote:
Originally Posted by talaniman
"Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice....................you ain't gonna fool me twice!" - GWB
That should be relevant.
Irrelevant and inaccurate.
Quote:
There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — — shame on you. Fool me — — You can't get fooled again. -GWB
Makes more sense my way, but that was George.
It was funnier George's way.
Can't argue that point.
Just thought we needed more facts for the debate.
HAHAHA,Ooops! - Paul Ryan's SUPPORT For The STIMULUS - Democratic Underground
More right wing hypocrisy, or a hidden agenda. I say BOTH!!
Just flip floppin along
Hey where are all those righties defending their golden boy?? Have they run out of rocks?
How many threads do you want to discuss this on, all of them?
It's a very popular topic all over the internet and other medium. People seem to be shocked by this person.Quote:
Originally Posted by speechlesstx
You just can't resist the fallacies can you, that was an obvious appeal to emotion. The only reason anyone MIGHT be "shocked" by Ryan is because of fear mongering from the left.
Actually it has nothing to do with emotion but straight up facts: Google TrendsQuote:
Originally Posted by speechlesstx
It is part of the current most-searched-topics on Google in the US. It has just recently trended down.
Here's a partial list of the articles:
https://www.google.com/search?q=todd...=m&safe=active
Dude, we're discussing Paul Ryan, not Todd Akin. Akin's an idiot.
They are all related and paint a true picture of what you guys really stand for. Its my duty to connect the dots, even the ones you don't want connected. You can't step to the forefront and be the leader of the free world by just blaming the other guy without tying failure to the agenda of the republicans.Quote:
Originally Posted by speechlesstx
I mean the rich guy is running on a platform that he isn't rich enough, and needs more welfare for him and his so called job creators.
How does he pay for it? His plan is on line,read it for yourself and answer the question. He chose a running mate who was part of the down fall of the economy and has voted to stop the economy and ruin the credit rating of the country.
The government is not a CHURCH, and its NOT a business.
Its job is not to promote GOD or cater to those who do, nor is it its job to promote corporate welfare for the rich and already rich. Its JOB is to promote the general welfare of ALL its people.
You want a weak government that lets churches and corporation write the laws we live under, I DON'T!!
So learn the difference between straw and brick before you buy the house next to a cliff. It may be a great view, but also a dangerous one.
Excellent post sir. I applaud you.Quote:
Originally Posted by talaniman
That would be fine if you didn't fabricate the dots you're connecting.Quote:
Originally Posted by talaniman
and yet that has been the single governing policy of the Obots for 3 1/2 years.Quote:
You can't step to the forefront and be the leader of the free world by just blaming the other guy without tying failure to the agenda of the republicans.
and yet the liberals pray at it's altar .Quote:
The government is not a CHURCH,
Sour grapes
That doesn't even mean anything.Quote:
Originally Posted by tomder55
Hello again,
I'm confused... The Republican party PLATFORM has a plank that says NO abortion exception for rape or incest...
Then Reince Priebus said, "This is the platform of the Republican Party; it's not the platform of Mitt Romney."
How is that, exactly??
excon
The platform has been voted on yet . Most times the party platform is finalized in the convention.In the Republican's case ;it will be a Monday vote .
It is also not unusual for the party standard bearer to not agree to many planks of the platform . Priebus is correct in saying it is the party's platform and not necessarily the candidates.
G.O.P. Approves Strict Anti-abortion Language in Party Platform - NYTimes.comQuote:
But Mr. Romney would hardly be the first Republican nominee at odds with his party's more absolute opposition to abortion. Just four years ago, the Republican Party adopted a platform with a similar plank seeking an unconditional ban on abortion, even though its nominee, Senator John McCain of Arizona, had urged the party in the past to allow certain exceptions.
Simularily ;in 2008 ,the Dems made concessions in their platform to appease the Clintonistas .
Compromise Platform Draft Goes to Democratic Convention - NYTimes.com
What is the point of having a party platform if the candidates are not signed on to it?
They will . But it will be the party platform ;and not something Romney dictates . I imagine there will be some kind of floor fight Monday with the Ronulans trying to introduce some of their planks.
That's funny! Ronulans! So now we have the romulans and the ronulans working together, just like romulus and rhemus, but remember Rome wasn't built in a dayQuote:
Originally Posted by tomder55
It always happens this way. In 2008 the Dem platform supported Gay marriage and their candidate didn't
Ryan supports his party platform already! The battle is half won on the right.
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:13 AM. |