If that is not Hunter's signature on the invoice for the work on the computer let Quid say so tonight. If Quid is not the "big guy" referenced in emails and the texts let Quid deny it tonight.

Maybe he was setting up his retirement job for after politics like they all do. Are we going to investigate the dufus debts too or foreign accounts?

If that is what he was doing ,let him tell the country that tonight too .

Love to hear it myself if the dufus doesn't interrupt, as if a turned off mic will stop him.

What I want Trump to do is refer to Quid as 'the big guy ' every time he addresses him .

Quote:

---

What I want Trump to do is refer to Quid as 'the big guy ' every time he addresses him .

---

That would make it more interesting.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tomder55

What I want Trump to do is refer to Quid as 'the big guy ' every time he addresses him .

---

Trump's the "big guy." How much does he weigh now?

Oh my. Fat shaming now??

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

Oh my. Fat shaming now??

---

Reality.

As expected ,Quid says he didn't take any Russian money but doesn't mention Hunter. Nor does he deny the validity of the emails or the evidence coming out. Says it all Russian disinformation.

Anybody notice the dufus kid is a head taller than the old man at 14? Wow.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tomder55

As expected ,Quid says he didn't take any Russian money but doesn't mention Hunter. Nor does he deny the validity of the emails or the evidence coming out. Says it all Russian disinformation.

---

Nice answer.

Again he did NOT said that the emails are fake or that the laptop wasn't Hunter's

It's amazing how pols promise to spend money when we have accepted that it can all be done with borrowed money. It's a politician's dream, but it should be our nightmare.

We agree. Seems foolish to give money to rich guys who don't need it when we really don't have it to give.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by talaniman

We agree. Seems foolish to give money to rich guys who don't need it when we really don't have it to give.

---

when did not having money stop anyone, just print more

Quote:

---

We agree. Seems foolish to give money to rich guys who don't need it when we really don't have it to give.

---

Amazing how you consider taxing less to somehow amount to "giving money" to people. You do realize that it is their money to begin with?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

Amazing how you consider taxing less to somehow amount to "giving money" to people. You do realize that it is their money to begin with?

---

No socialist or liberal will ever admit to that

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

Amazing how you consider taxing less to somehow amount to "giving money" to people. You do realize that it is their money to begin with?

---

That's what conservatives say and always have so no surprise you echo the sentiment over the common national good. A weak central government is an old concept but a government strong enough to serve and protect it's people is my idea of a priority.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by paraclete

No socialist or liberal will ever admit to that

---

And no capitalist conservative will ever admit to equal protection under the law, or equality in general. Profits over people is the rule.

I disagree.

Conservatives say that because it’s true.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jlisenbe

Conservatives say that because it’s true.

---

I disagree. Unregulated capitalism is a sure path to corruption and inequality. Giving the richest economic power over the least, is the very example of slavery since we shed blood to eliminate it, so why go down that path which I submit we already have?

Trading chains and whips for dollars and cents isn't progress, nor is it as voluntary as advertised.