Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tomder55

His generalizations are simular to Clete's "shiftless rich " comments.

---

Hi Tom,

My criticism was in relation to the first part of his post. In other words, it was not a criticism of generalizations. It was actually a criticism of so called, 'evidence' presented by Smoothy. What Smoothy has provided is not evidence to support or deny the proposition one way or the other. Generalizations may well be a issue, but I wasn't addressing that.

My criticism of generalizations related to the next part of his post.

Tut