Quote:

---

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

instead of leading others to believe things never said or even implied?

---

Hello again, Steve:

Well, of course, you don't like it when they bust down your door. THAT part of the Fourth Amendment you're cool with. But, when it comes to the surveillance state, all I've heard from you is (1) they're not listening to me, or (2) if they are, they're not interested.

That doesn't sound, to me, like you're too outraged about it - certainly not like you are about your front door. If I'm implying incorrectly, straighten me out.

excon

The only thing I have defended that has you in a tizzy is monitoring possible terrorist communications originating from overseas. From that one thing you surmise I don't care about your rights - against all other evidence.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

From that one thing you surmise I don't care about your rights

---

Hello again, Steve:

Uh, huh!

excon

Are you getting calls from terrorists overseas?

What should we do about home grown terrorists??

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

Are you getting calls from terrorists overseas?

---

Hello again, Steve:

Oh, I get it. You TRUST 'em! Doesn't sound very right wing of you... Oh yeah, that's right. These are the COP parts of government that gives you guys thrills up your legs.

excon

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

Are you getting calls from terrorists overseas?

---

But the wiretaps have little to do with terrorism.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by talaniman

What should we do about home grown terrorists???

---

Kill 'em all.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NeedKarma

But the wiretaps have little to do with terrorism.

---

Yeah, so? I addressed you both appropriately.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by excon

Oh, I get it. You TRUST 'em!! Doesn't sound very right wing of you... Oh yeah, that's right. These are the COP parts of government that gives you guys thrills up your legs.

---

Again, try for a change being honest about my position instead of misleading others about it. I would imagine we both get thrills up our leg from the same thing(s) and that doesn't include cops or Obama. Unless maybe it's one hot lady cop.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

Yeah, so? I addressed you both appropriately.

---

Kill 'em all?

Excuse me, [Sarc]Kill 'em all.[/Sarc]

Better?

So that means don't kill them all? Why speak in parables?

You have to find 'em first.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by talaniman

You have to find 'em first.

---

That's why the US gov has to listen in on your phone conversations and your internet traffic.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NeedKarma

So that means don't kill them all? Why speak in parables?

---

That wasn't a parable, it was sarcasm.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by speechlesstx

That wasn't a parable, it was sarcasm.

---

So you often choose sarcasm ("A form of wit that is marked by the use of sarcastic language and is intended to make its victim the butt of contempt or ridicule.") to communicate here. Why not speak to people with a minimum of respect like an adult?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NeedKarma

So you often choose sarcasm ("A form of wit that is marked by the use of sarcastic language and is intended to make its victim the butt of contempt or ridicule.") to communicate here. Why not speak to people with a minumum of respect like an adult?

---

Why do you ask me questions you should be asking yourself?

Oh well, I tried.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NeedKarma

Oh well, I tried.

---

You may be the most trying person speechless knows. ;)