Originally Posted by
excon
Hello again, tom:
The Constitutional distinction is a declaration of war. You can't have the benefits of a war without declaring it..
Therefore, there is no such distinction in the law as "enemy combatants. Without a declaration of war, there are only criminals. That would endow them with Constitutional rights. These criminals committed their crime in NY City. Seems to me, they should be tried in NY City.
Bush had a chance to follow the Constitution. He could have asked for a declaration of war. He would have gotten it. He chose not to. There's repercussions for doing that.
excon