 |
Hello again, smoothy:
Look. I'm NO apologist for Bill Clintoon. YOU, on the other hand, appear to be apologizing for the systematic rape of 1,000's and 1,000's of innocent children..
In my view, to compare the two is OUTRAGEOUS. But, that's just me.
excon
Geez smoothy because catholics are afraid to challenge the Pope, how does that compare with what repubs did to Clinton? Now when I see the pope in court, then we can compare it. Fact remains though, no matter who is at fault, the catholic church has little credibility when it comes to protecting children, and women.
But they are great at protecting themselves, I will concede that.
Look, if you guys want to distract from the issue at hand and attack the Catholic church why not start a new thread? None of us support child abuse, all of us expect accountability, but it is irrelevant to protecting OUR right to religious freedom.
I thought it was settled Speech because YOUR rights are for you to decide. I have already decided no church will stand between me and the God that I understand and MY rights to protect me and mine and pursue MY happiness through Good Orderly Direction.
I really don't have a problem with YOU, or the church pursuing YOUR rights, be it on Sunday, or a court date. Just don't expect ME to let YOUR rights interfere in MINE. Then we have a problem.
As the spirit moves you.
Let me start by stating I'm not a Catholic (but my wife is)... but the Pope hasn't been charged much less convicted of anything.Quote:
Originally Posted by talaniman
And there are plenty of crooks in any slice of the population you might chose to pick... even among the Law Enforcement community.
The Catholics don't have that market cornered by any definition of the word. And in fact I could argue certain other groups are far worse than they are..
Not sure what any of that has to do with the government violating religious freedom but OK.Quote:
Originally Posted by talaniman
What movie ? Send me a link . I'm sure it treats Catholics as fair as most of the media .Quote:
Originally Posted by excon
He would be referring to this.
Father Lawrence Murphy molested deaf boys in Milwaukee in the 1950s,and Pope Benedict is responsible and should go to jail ? I can tell you that when the revelations started to come out ,Pope John Paul II asked Cardinal Ratzinger (now the Pope) to investigate the various reports . If anything this Pope has shed sunshine on the problem. He was not involved in covering it up.
You see ;covering up pedophilia should be the exclusive domain of the MSM... and the Obama DHS .Quote:
Originally Posted by smoothy
ABC news knew of allegations involving Senator Menendez on May 2, 2012, and sat on the story.. and DHS covered up their investigation of an illegal alien child abuser that Menendez hired until after the elections.
Right, I believe the words ex used were the Catholic church is "a CRIMINAL organization."
No I think he said it is an organisation used by criminalsQuote:
Originally Posted by speechlesstx
I specifically remember the actual words Criminal organization used... on more than one occasion... but I think that might have been other threads.
Hello again,
What significant difference does it make what I called it? It's an organization RIFE with criminals, RIFE with enablers, and RIFE with people who kept it secret...
Now, I don't care WHAT you want to call it, but it should be DISBANDED and PROSECUTED.
excon
I think the same about the Democrat Party... you just described them perfectly.Quote:
Originally Posted by excon
Hello again, smoothy:
I don't know WHY you think child molesters are wonderful people... I don't know WHY you keep defending them.. You HATE Democrats, and you HATE illegal aliens, but you LOVE baby rapers...
I don't understand it. But, I'll NEVER understand right wing thinking.
excon
Remember Barney Frank... Know who Menendez is.. (the drive by media is in a near full coverup mode with him right now) .they are part of the democrat party.Quote:
Originally Posted by excon
Another case of someone being factually incorrect for whatever reason. The Catholic Church has undoubtedly harboured persons who are criminals and have committed criminal acts, this is misguided for whatever reason. For some reason, known only to themselves, the molesting of children doesn't register in their mind as a criminal act and those who have harbour criminals don't see themselves as criminal but by some stupid twist as trying to restore the individual and protect the reputation of the Church without realising it is impossible to do either. When you serve God he will ensure truthQuote:
Originally Posted by smoothy
And right now the Democrat party and their cohorts in the Media are avoiding the very REAL topic of Democrat Senator Menendez and child prostitutes in the Dominican republic...Quote:
Originally Posted by paraclete
Robert Menendez Scandal Unfolds - NYTimes.com
And its not the first Democrat caught in sex scandals.
Look deep enough and you are going to find something rotten in every segment of society... even in your own home country.
Smoothy look deep enough and you are likely to find politicians of any hue caught is sex scandals. The left aren't the only ones with such tendencies, just those stupid enough to get caught
Hello again, smoothy:
Your attempt at moral equivalence falls just as flat as the others did...
I ask you again, what is it about child molesters that you find so appealing? Why do you find the need to apologize for them?
excon
Menendez was doing exactly what with Children in the Dominican Republic... and HE hasn't been thrown under the bus yet... and its CURRENT. THey covered for Barney Frank stretching the sphincter of an underage male intern for a very long time.Quote:
Originally Posted by excon
When the Dems clean up their own house first... then we can talk...
The only problem smoothy is the left celebrates their perverts.
The right puts their pervert on a pedestal and worships them as godly. If they are rich enough to payoff the victims, and stay out of jail.
Of course they are rich enough to hide their scandals.
The liberals call theirs Mr. President. Congressman or Senator.Quote:
Originally Posted by talaniman
Bam !Quote:
Originally Posted by smoothy
So you guys think Obama is a pervert?
I believe the reference is to Clinton.Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedKarma
He was referring to all liberal presidents, congressmen or senators.
Quote:
Originally Posted by smoothy
No, he wasn't Mr Grammar guy. There was no number stated or inferred let alone all inclusive. The reference is to status and position, not quantity.Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedKarma
So you think Clinton is a pervert then?
Yes and a rapist;and so is Menendez
So Clinton is a rapist too now? Interesting.
What is your criteria for someone to get the "pervert" and "rapist" labels?
Mine is to be a pervert and a rapist.
Oh I don't know... a pattern of abusing women including Paula Jones, Kathleen Wiley ,Gennifer Flowers , Juanita Broaddrick (who he raped ) ,Monica Lewinsky... and probably other unnamed women he's raped abuse or taken advantage of .
Edit.. Eileen Wellstone... I knew I forgot one rape victim.
Juanita Broaddrick - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Doesn't look like rape to an awful lot of people including people are are smarter than you.
Also:
Quote:
The Clinton White House released details of 15 letters and 12 telephone messages that Willey had sent to Clinton after the alleged incident. In all of these, she appeared friendly and eager for more contact with Clinton.
LOL, you'd make a terrible lawyer.Quote:
Mine is to be a pervert and a rapist.
Yeah all the women are lying .Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedKarma
Or maybe it's Clinton who's the liar
Mr. Clinton's Disbarment Case - NYTimes.com
Guess it depends on what the meaning of the word "is " is.
Wasn't trying to be, Mr Grammar King.Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedKarma
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:16 AM. |