Face it... if the Indiana law was up for debate today ,the left would oppose it. .
![]() |
Face it... if the Indiana law was up for debate today ,the left would oppose it. .
Come on... you told us 100 excuses why it would be unfair to ask some people to get id ;even when I pointed out that Pa made provisions for alll who would have difficulty . It doesn't impress me that some liberal judge disagrees . I expected it .
And rightfully so since you guys have a LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG history of grand ideas and no thought to process!!
Thats how Indiana got a FAIR voter ID law. Obviously the concept of fair goes against your thinking!! Or you just can't grasp details.
No wonder your guy you want to win doesn't need details of his process to turn you guys on!
As opposed to your guys jigging up a convoluted Health care law for the whole nation and shoving it up our keisters .What process they they follow ?
Took two years to pass and two years to implement. You have your own insurance and a doctor, so its not your keister being affected. RIGHT?
Indiana's laws may well be fair, but that is just one state. That leaves 49 other states to adopt fair or unfair voting practices.
As I said before, Indiana may well be a fair blue print for voter law but there is next to no chance every other state adopting the blueprint. How does the SCOTUS decision help one way or the other in this regard? I don't think it does.
I know of at least least one state ( Wisconsin ) that has been cited here that won't be adopting voter ID laws because the proposed ID laws were ruled unconstitutional by that state. Is SCOTUS going to rule that Wisconsin's voter laws are unconstitutional because of the process they used in formulating their voter laws?
Tut
that remains to be seen.What we have here is a stalling tactic by the Dems so that voter ID laws won't have an affect on the outcome of the 2012 elections . In other words ;they don't care that the current systems can corrupt the outcome because it works in their favor.Quote:
Is SCOTUS going to rule that Wisconsin's voter laws are unconstitutional because of the process they used in formulating their voter laws?
All Wisconsin had to do was change their state Constitution. They didn't. I Doubt they will try it either. And its presumptuous to even think dems will let the repubs do anything to suppress their votes.
Prevent changes ? Your side is the one that is blocking needed changes in the process.
We have to block the changes YOU want because they are not well thought out or practical.
What you think we should go along with the rights program and sacrifice our own rights, just so you get the black guy out of the white house and let your guy extract what little money is left to redistribute it his way, and pee on our heads and call it rain?
I don't think so!
We haven't forgotten, or forgiven GWB. You have though.
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:35 AM. |