 |
Yep. It just sailed right over the ole head.Quote:
Yeah, watch the videos of those peaceful protesters. Would you want them at your birthday party?
Would not be a surprise at all, but it would sure be justice in action if true.Quote:
4 x Emmy Award winning ;3 x Edward R Murrow Award winning reporter Bill Melugin is reporting that according to his ICE sources ; DePape is an illegal immigrants as a longtime visa overstay
Just in --
The man who broke into the home of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and attacked her husband with a hammer told authorities he planned on breaking her kneecaps and he viewed her as “the leader of the pack” of lies told by the Democratic Party, according to court documents.
The man who broke into the home of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and attacked her husband with a hammer told authorities he planned on breaking her kneecaps and he viewed her as “the leader of the pack” of lies told by the Democratic Party, according to court documents.
The Justice Department charged David DePape with the attempted kidnapping of a federal officer and assault of the immediate family member of a federal officer on Monday afternoon.
Authorities allege that DePape broke into Pelosi’s San Francisco residence early Friday morning and assaulted her husband with a hammer. The congresswoman was in Washington, D.C., at the time of the attack, and Paul Pelosi continues to recover from surgery at a local hospital.
In the criminal complaint released Monday, an FBI special agent stated that during DePape’s interview with police, he claimed that he was going to hold Nancy Pelosi hostage and talk to her. If she told the truth, he would let her go, but if she lied, he would break her kneecaps. DePape said his assumption was that Pelosi would lie to him, and he viewed her as the “‘leader of the pack’ of lies told by the Democratic Party,” according to the complaint.
“DePape also later explained that by breaking Nancy’s kneecaps, she would then have to be wheeled into Congress, which would show other members of Congress there were consequences to actions,” read the filing.
So an illegal alien, member of the Green Party, an advocate for public nudity, and reportedly one with decidedly liberal views, determines that he wants NP to tell the truth. Hmmm. Sounds like that sentiment is spreading even to left-wingers! That's good news.
Wrong. Again!Quote:
Originally Posted by tomder55
Almost 1,000 arrests, longest prison term so far 60 months, 14 arrested for seditious conspiracy, 4 cop suicides, 1 rioter dead, 1 cop dead, 150+ police injuries, 80+ charged with deadly weapons. Stated purpose of the insurrectionists was to overthrow the government. Yelled death to Mike Pence and Nancy Pelosi.
Your comment of no firearms is right out of QANON. A deadly weapon does not have to be a firearm, although 4 were photographed carrying firearms. Ever get a fire extinguisher thrown at you? Or be assaulted with a flagpole? Over 80 have been charged with the use of deadly weapons.
I'm curious, tomder. Are you an election denier?
flag poles such is the weapon of an insurgency . Did they forget their pitch forks ?Quote:
80+ charged with deadly weapons
I'm curious, tomder. Are you an election denier?
Nope elections have been stolen in this country before and results accepted . I bet you support election deniers like Evita and Stacy Abrams .
Back to Paulie
Now that DePape has been charged how about releasing
the audio of the 9-1-1 call
the responding officers body cams
toxicology reports
images of the broken door has the shattered glass outside the house and not inside as would normally happen from an outside break in ,
What do security cameras from the Pelosi house or their neighbors show ?
Initial reports say that a 3rd party opened the door for the police . Now we are told only 2 people were there Initial reports say that the police were responding to a "wellness check " not a break in . Why that discrepancy ? Paulie called 9-1-1 from his bathroom . If he felt threatened surely he would've mentioned that to the dispatcher .
Well at least I can figure out how an illegal alien lived in the city for decades . San Fran is a sanctuary city .
Yes. I have a funny feeling there is a reason we haven't seen much of that yet.Quote:
Back to Paulie
Now that DePape has been charged how about releasing
the audio of the 9-1-1 call
the responding officers body cams
toxicology reports
images of the broken door has the shattered glass outside the house and not inside as would normally happen from an outside break in ,
What do security cameras from the Pelosi house or their neighbors show ?
Initial reports say that a 3rd party opened the door for the police . Now we are told only 2 people were there Initial reports say that the police were responding to a "wellness check " not a break in . Why that discrepancy ? Paulie called 9-1-1 from his bathroom . If he felt threatened surely he would've mentioned that to the dispatcher .
zip ties not ok for Pelosi but ok for Kavanaugh
Man with gun, knife arrested near Justice Kavanaugh's house (nbcnews.com)
mum was the word
Media Uninterested in Kavanaugh Assassination Attempt (dailysignal.com)
It took 3 days in the instant information age for officials to clarify and /or retract some "facts "
Paulie did not know his attacker
Paulie and DePape were not wrestling in their underwear.
The door to the Pelosi mansion was not opened by a 3rd party
They were not having a duel of hammers .It was only one hammer.
Missing still is
audio of the 9-1-1 call.
bodycams of the responding police
video surveillance from the Pelosi mansion (yeah ok they had an elevator in the house but no security system ...... gimme a break !)
We now know the Trumpie right wing extremist who attacked Paulie lived in a bus with BLM banners and a gay rights flag on it.
I guess in time we will get further 'clarification'
In Arizona, the democrat candidate for governor had her office burglarized. She naturally wanted to blame the repub candidate, Kari Lake. Come to find out that was not the case. "On Thursday, Phoenix Police Department (PPD) arrested a homeless man charged with burglarizing Democratic gubernatorial candidate Katie Hobbs’ office. Hobbs accused her opponent, Kari Lake, of inciting the break-in."
So now that it's apparent that her initial attack on Lake has gone up in smoke, she wants to change the subject. "Katie Hobbs when asked about the campaign office burglary & what items were taken/if there’s reason to believe it was politically motivated: 'I’m not talking about it.'"
At campaign event, Lake mocks attack.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/arizona-g...034544263.html
In the wake of Friday’s attack on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband, Paul, at the couple’s San Francisco home, some Republicans have seen fit to either joke about the incident or promote unfounded conspiracy theories about it.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/prominent...214138311.html
This was the quote in your article.
So did she say something untrue? What was "mocking" about that observation?Quote:
"Asked about school security, Lake suggested the protection afforded to federal lawmakers should be available to students, as well."Nancy Pelosi, well, she’s got protection when she’s in D.C. — apparently her house doesn’t have a lot of protection," Lake said at a campaign event in Scottsdale, Arizona, sparking laughter from many in attendance.
Lake then said, "If our lawmakers can have protection, if our politicians can have protection, if our athletes, then certainly the most important people in our lives — our children — should have protection."
First paragraph, jl:
"The Republican nominee for governor of Arizona, Kari Lake, made light of the attack on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband in remarks at a campaign event Monday, drawing laughter from the audience."
As to your other link, I don't care for the suggestions about PP supposedly being engaged in some sort of sexual arrangement, but that's why we are calling for the police bodycam footage to be released as well as the 911 calls. It does seem strange that they have not done so.
Yes, that's what your left-wing journalist observed. That was her opinion, but I asked you about the remarks actually made by Lake. So I'll ask again. Did she say something that was untrue? In what way did she mock or make light of the attack???Quote:
"The Republican nominee for governor of Arizona, Kari Lake, made light of the attack on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband in remarks at a campaign event Monday, drawing laughter from the audience."
Paul Pelosi is 82 years old (will be 83 in April), was sound asleep at break-in time a bit after 2 a.m. Um, let me know, jl, when you get to be that age as to how many sexual arrangements you have at 2 a.m. And yes, undoubtedly he had to pee.
That's all fine and good, but you still are evading the question, so I'll ask again. Did she say something that was untrue? In what way did she mock or make light of the attack???
I ask that secure in the knowledge that, as is nearly always the case, you will dodge the uncomfortable question.
How do you know he was sound asleep at the time of the breakin?Quote:
was sound asleep at break-in time a bit after 2 a.m
I haven't suggested or even hinted that I believe that was the case. It would be nice if you would stop making it up as you go along,Quote:
sexual arrangements
You missed the mock, O Cherry-Picker!Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
If he wasn't asleep, it was because he was reaching for his urinal next to the bed.Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
Oh well. You don't have the courage to answer, preferring instead to resort to your tiresome and childish "cherry-picking" absurdity, and I don't have the patience to ask a FOURTH time, so I'll leave it with you.
Oh well. You don't have the courage to reread the article, preferring instead to resort to your tiresome and childish downputting, and I don't have the patience to wait any longer for a response, so off I go to do something important -- I've got cornbread to bake, a client's vampire romance to edit, "Jeopardy" to watch, and my primary doctor's wellness questionnaire to fill out and return.
And yet another strange development in a strange case.
Not exactly another big win for the Capitol Police.Quote:
Officers from the U.S. Capitol Police have live video surveillance outside the Pelosi's San Francisco residence, but weren't watching it when David DePape, 42, allegedly attacked Paul Pelosi, the husband of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, sources tell Fox News.
The officers were monitoring a live-feed of many cameras, which include surveillance of the capitol complex, but also monitor some points away from the capitol, which include the Pelosi residence.
According to sources, an officer was monitoring the feeds and saw police lights on a dark street outside the Pelosi's residence. When going through surveillance footage, the officer saw the alleged attack on Oct. 28, when DePape allegedly struck Paul Pelosi, people briefed on the incident said, according to the report.
it was lunch break
I wonder if they will stop watching video surveillance of Depape's prison cell ala Jeffrey Epstein ?
I doubt we will ever see Depape publicly again.... like many of the Jan 6 protesters who are held in GITMO like conditions .
You never know what to expect from those extreme right-wing Capitol Police. Next thing you know, they'll be letting a group of Trump supporters take over the Capitol Building and then start calling it an insurrection!
It just gets curiouser and curiouser.
Quote:
NBC News caused a firestorm on social media after it retracted its explosive reporting on last week's attack of Paul Pelosi. On Friday's installment of "Today," NBC News national correspondent Miguel Almaguer went viral for stunning revelations of what apparently transpired when police arrived to Pelosi's San Francisco home.
"Sources familiar with what unfolded in the Pelosi residence now revealing when officers responded to the 'high priority call,' they were seemingly unaware they've been called to the home of the Speaker of the House," Almaguer told viewers. "After a 'knock and announce,' the front door was opened by Mr. Pelosi. The 82-year-old did not immediately declare an emergency or tried to leave his home but instead began walking several feet back into the foyer toward the assailant and away from police. It's unclear if the 82-year-old was already injured or what his mental state was, say sources."
Paul and Nancy Pelosi on April 25, 2015, in Washington, D.C.; Image shows FBI agents outside the home of Nancy and Paul Pelosi on Oct. 28, 2022. (Dimitrios Kambouris/VF15/WireImage ; Fox News)
"According to court documents, when the officer asked what was going on, defendant smiled and said 'everything's good' but instantaneously a struggle ensued as police clearly saw David DePape strike Paul Pelosi in the head with a hammer. After tackling the suspect, officers rushed to Mr. Pelosi who was lying in a pool of blood," Almaguer continued.
Paul was correct to act friendly-ish with a home invader who was wielding a hammer. I would have offered him a snack and "plotted" with him for when Nancy returns home.
JL, message me when you are 82.
The curious aspect was why NBC posted the story and then, a few hours later, decided to take it down. I'm not saying there is definitely something being hidden, but it does look suspicious. Where is the body cam footage from the police or the 911 tapes?
If I was fearful for my life and the cops finally showed up, I'd go out the door quickly and let them deal with the perp. To smile and say, "Everything's good," just strikes me as very strange.
None of it adds up. He supposedly broke a window to gain entrance. This is the Speaker of the House's residence, and yet there is no security to detect that break in? The house was not being actively monitored? It just has a lot of strange aspects.
Evidently PP was not armed and thus was unable to defend himself. There is a lesson to be learned there for sure.
There ARE live cameras. This particular one at the break-in site wasn't manned at the time. The cop was on a potty break?Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
Yes, I had mentioned that earlier. That no one was bothering to man the monitor is pretty curious itself.Quote:
There ARE live cameras. This particular one at the break-in site wasn't manned at the time.
Who wants to sit behind a camera all night??? Boring, boring, boring. We have security cameras and use them to watch for the arrival of our late-night dinner guests (Sally Skunk, Ricky Raccoon, Randy Raccoon, and little Peter Possum). They enjoy the Temptation treats and cat food that Mattie the Cat (our indoor cat) won't eat.Quote:
Originally Posted by jlisenbe
We certainly don't keep our eyes glued to EZ-VIZ (the cameras) otherwise.
Yeah. After all, it's only the residence of one of the most powerful people in our government and the person second in line to the presidency. Why would anyone bother to consider that job to be important? They could say, "Hey! WG doesn't monitor her home camera all the time, so why should we do this?" [SARC EXTREME]Quote:
Who wants to sit behind a camera all night???
I could tell them how to attract wildlife for late-night dinners -- so there'd be fun activity to watch. Or do like my husband did. Set up a computer monitor (or a tv) next to the security screen, so they can easily watch both. This is NOT difficult!
If I ever have the opportunity, I'll tell the Capitol Police to go by your house for a little instruction. Then the Speaker could really sleep well at night, knowing that the cops were monitoring the house while they were watching a replay of the Super Bowl at the same time.
As long as they aren't watching an x-rated movie that they've torrented. And I would instruct them in how to psych out any trespassers!
Huh?Quote:
an x-rated movie that they've torrented.
Maybe they could watch the latest porn movie from Stacey Abrams!! "The Naughty Governor"
And definitely don't give Paul a gun to keep under his mattress or on his nightstand. In suddenly awakened grogginess, who knows who or what he'd shoot -- Nancy returning early? A guard doing a check?
Yeah. Not having a gun sure worked out well, didn’t it?
He wudda shot hisself in his foot.
As opposed to being hit in the head with a hammer. Great plan you got there. I tell you what. You can count on the police who aren't there, and I'll count on a firearm that is here.
That whole "hit on the head with a hammer" adventure has some weirdnesses in it too.
I'll count on my knowledge of and experience with mentally ill people.
Right.Quote:
I'll count on my knowledge of and experience with mentally ill people.
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:14 AM. |