Quote:
Originally Posted by
jlisenbe
The text says, "Theˇ President: I would like you to do us a favor though
because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a
lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with
this whole si�uation with Ukraine, they s_ay Crowdstrike... I guess
you have one of your wealthy people... The server, they say
Ukraine has.it� There - are a lot. of things that went on, theˇ
:whole situation ..I think you 1 re _surrounding yourseˇlf with some
of the same people. I .would like to have the Attorney General
call you or your people and I would like you t� ˇget to the
bottom of it�. As you sa� yest�rday, that whole nonsetise ended
with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mue�le_r, an
incompetent performance -, _but they. say a lot of it started with
Ukraine. Whatever you can do, ˇit's very important thatˇ you. do it
if that's possible."
Oooohhh! Really sounds sinister!! Please do us a favor??
Quote:
According to Politico, "The Trump administration is slow-walking $250 million in military assistance to Ukraine, annoying lawmakers and advocates who argue the funding is critical to keeping Russia at bay.
President Donald Trump asked his national security team to review the funding program, known as the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative, in order to ensure the money is being used in the best interest of the United States, a senior administration official told POLITICO on Wednesday."
Yeah, his ONLY concerns were investigating the Bidens and Ukraine election interference and collusion with the dems. That's a pretty narrow review, and pretty specific and a quid pro quo, THIS for THAT. Or did we miss more favors he requested. The tell here is what he asked for, which by law is illegal, even as a "favor" , and what NSA team?"Generally in
common law courts the "hearsay rule" applies, which says that a trier of fact (judge or jury) cannot be informed of a hearsay statement unless it meets certain strict requirements. However, the rules for admissibility are more relaxed in court systems based on the
civil law system. In the civil law system, the courts, whether consisting only of judges or featuring a
jury, have wide latitude to appreciate the evidence brought before them....Furthermore, even in common-law systems, the hearsay rule only applies to actual trials. Hearsay is admissible as evidence in many other judicial proceedings, such as
grand jury deliberations,
probation hearings,
parole revocation hearings, and proceedings before administrative bodies."
When you don't have a clue then anybody can lie right to your face! Present company excepted. You can quote scripture but concepts like the law escape you and ignorance of the LAW is no excuse. Ever hear that before?
