As long as your country puts wealth as the ultimate prize you will always have this problem.
|
As long as your country puts wealth as the ultimate prize you will always have this problem.
No really... they want government cheese. The moment the President began offering student loan relief ,the movement lost steam. This week was the anniversary of the movement . Where were they ? The news reported "100s" of protesters in NYC . What a joke!Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedKarma
No ,but we will continue to have this problem as long as the government decides winners and losers with tax policy ,law and, regulation .Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedKarma
You realize that the problem had been getting worse during the Bush years, right? Housing bubble, McMansions, Hummers, huge line ups on Black Friday, etc. The government made them do it?Quote:
Originally Posted by tomder55
Yawn... that is the final answer... Bush did it. I have not given Repubics a pass on the direction this country has taken .
It's been going on for a while, regardless of the administration.
It's the system, that marvellous capitalist system that lets the rich take from the poor
It's the increasing deregulation that's been going on. More than 30 years and now there is no way the job creators who have made no jobs in America are giving up there cash cow.
Apples new phone will shift millions of dollars to its overseas subsidiary to escape paying taxes in America, after making profits in America. Does this sound like a rigged economic system or what.
That's part of the uncertainty they speak about, whether they will be forced to pay their far shares or NOT!! And make bookoo bucks still while hiding bookoo bucks.
Well of course it is transfer pricing has been one of the tax evasion tools for decades and the only one's who have the ability to take advantage of it are multinationals, it should be outlawed it isn't as though the IRS don't have enough statistics on what the profit margin of certain industries is. They talk about flat tax, let's have a flat tax but on corporations as well as individuals, I bet that would get the deficit down how does 20% across the board sound?
How about 40% + a 20% swindling fine. But the new trade treaties also call for reporting American business transactions through their banks to the IRS. Previously this has been a closed area between America and foreign banking entities.
And that is part of the uncertainty with the multi nationals, how much loot have they really distributed to safe hiding places around the world. That includes Mitt Romney, our other presidential candidate who has made his loot by showing others how to hide money, and take over assets of other companies, and countries.
Hard to imagine how many trillions are out there.
I would say there are enough trillions squiralled away by american multinations in foreign places to repay the american debt many times over and of course Romney wants them to have the ability to squirrel more away by strengthening US trade with more trade agreements, which of course is Romneyspeak for offshore accounts and screwing anyone stupid enough to enter into one of these agreements. When I say this know that I speak of my own nation who was stupid enough to fall for it during the Bush era. I don't think I can name a single benefit it has brought us. It hasn't allowed us to sell gas to California or beef to the US, our auto industry is virtually shut out of the US. I tell you what we have; some nice kangaroo meat or crocodile meat you can't grow in the US
We have alligator meat here Clete, but do you think a President Romney would be looking for hidden loot from rich guys? I sure don't!Quote:
On March 20, 2007, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service declassified the American crocodile as an endangered species, downgrading its status to "threatened"; the reptile remains protected from illegal harassing, poaching or killing under the federal Endangered Species Act.[33][3
Of course he will hide even more.
And the most transparent president evah just lied and blamed Fast & Furious on Bush. Might I also add he thinks the IG report exonerates Holder and he lied about having "released almost all" of the documents.Quote:
Originally Posted by tomder55
The IG testimony to the House Committee sounded to me like he came real close to accusing the White House of stone-walling the investigation and covering up the facts.
Nothing like the truth is there Tom
By law he couldn't release ALL the documents.
Yeah we know national security and all that jazz, look it's on a need to know basis and you just don't need to know. Who knows it maybe their plan to take over Mexico by destabilising it
Actually the law says ongoing investigations are not subject to public release. Its to eliminate politisizing be either party and tainting the investigations of the DOJ!
Surprisingly(?) all the subjects of Darrell Issas congressional probes have been exonerated and cleared. Maybe he would do better if his partisan witch hunts became BI partisan. Mexico has a gang problem sure enough, but is hardly destabilized.
Hello again,
Speaking as a fellow who DOESN'T believe Fast & Furious was a conspiracy perpetrated by Obama so he could confiscate all the guns during his second term, I don't get the fascination you have with this situation... The outcome was tragic, but it was a low level operation from the git go...
Then again, if I DID believe that stuff, then it would have much broader implications, like you think it does... Does your indignation stem from that belief?
excon
You sound like the Nixonians... what was the Watergate ? "third-rate burglary," ? Had the Holder Justice Dept been up front about it then perhaps it wouldn't have become the scandal it has become . Doesn't the families of Agents Brian Terry and Jaime Zapata deserve to know the truth ?
The conspiracy truth of Issa, or the IG report?
IG Horowitz confirmed Thursday to a House panel that Obama's White House obstructed his investigation .
Some of these things come down to who's the boss, and who's witch hunt you are supporting.
Which law would that really be?Quote:
Originally Posted by talaniman
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31727_162-20115038-10391695.html
Or is this one better for you ?
http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/11/u-s-seals-court-records-border-patrol-s-murder/
Or was it maybe this one ?
http://visiontoamerica.com/4599/democrats-introduce-legislation-to-seal-obamas-presidential-records/
http://roblorinov.wordpress.com/2011/11/30/coverup-obama-admin-seals-records-of-murdered-border-patrol-agent-implicated-in-fast-and-furious-the-weekly-standard/Quote:
Originally Posted by tomder55
You didn't mention the protection of the federal informants in any of those articles that are NOT the law.
?Fast and Furious? Linked to Immunity Deal Between U.S. and Sinaloa Cartel, Trafficking Defendant Alleges in Court Papers | CNSNews.com
Classified Information Procedures Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaQuote:
Nevertheless, the U.S. government last September filed a motion to invoke the Classified Information Procedures Act, which is aimed at assuring that national security information stemming from criminal cases – such as details associated with CIA operations – are not leaked to the public during court proceedings.
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:13 AM. |