I beg to differ, but so far we have the dufus's own people giving first hand testimony to what they saw. 10 EYEWITNESSES who work for the dufus! That's NOT circumstantial, and they have ALL verified the WB's initial testimony. All you have are the dufus LIES.

The process continues.

Quote:

---

I beg to differ, but so far we have the dufus's own people giving first hand testimony to what they saw.

---

Give one example by name of first hand witness of illegal activity.

We are beyond that debate JL, we have moved to the phase of presenting evidence to the American public, and formal articles of IMPEACHMENT. You may as well just sit and eat popcorn with me and enjoy the fireworks.

Quote:

---

We are beyond that debate JL, we have moved to the phase of presenting evidence to the American public, and formal articles of IMPEACHMENT. You may as well just sit and eat popcorn with me and enjoy the fireworks.

---

In other words, you don't have the slightest idea.

If you wish to characterize it that way, go ahead, but I think I have posted all my opinions with links already. Soliciting a foreign government to get dirt on your political foes is against the law whether it worked or not. You don't agree with that, even thought it started in May, and used taxpayer money for the leverage?

You see nothing wrong with this conspiracy to win an election using a foreign government? Using OUR government for his political purpose?

Quote:

---

You see nothing wrong with this conspiracy to win an election using a foreign government? Using OUR government for his political purpose?

---

If you have any genuine proof that such a thing happened, then bring it forward.

Don't need too. We are about to see if the dems are as incompetent at getting the dufus as the repubs were getting the Clintons or Obama. Pass the popcorn.

Quote:

---

Don't need too. We are about to see if the dems are as incompetent at getting the dufus as the repubs were getting the Clintons or Obama. Pass the popcorn.

---

Amen.