 |
That's only because yours aren't covered on the news most of the time because it would violate the right to privacy of the accused who have not yet been convicted.
You could have a serial rapist living next to you... and not even know it in Canada. Because their rights exceed yours.
Not to mention there are fewer people in Canda to begin with. The State of California has more people living there than the entire Country of Canada....
The right to self defense extends to protection from the government .Quote:
Too many loopholes for my sensibility, and who needs a 30 round clip for a semi automatic rifle? Hunters surely don't. Got no problems with the firing range though.
Did some posts go missing in this thread?
The Democrat Party agenda follows this to a "T"
Attachment 46251
Yep, sounds about right for you.
Defense from the government is best done by vote, and the court. The threat of tyranny of OUR government of the people lies in the corruption bought the old fashion way by the Oligarchs and their MONEY, they extracted (STOLE) through laws they wrote and exploited.
A gun won't change that.
And yet your people keep putting Bargara Fiensteirn, Barbara Boxer,Nancy Pelosi, Harry Ried, Durban and others back into office as they embody that and gained their personal wealth by exploiting it.
And they likely want to exterminate americans jews too, eh smoothy?
Yeah we should have voted for your nuts like Palin, Angle and that witch girl, in Delaware, or the rich guy whose expertise in making money was loading American companies with debt and closing them down for a profit and sending it to offshore safe havens.
"You can't bring a lawsuit to a gunfight" Palin says yesterday, but she thinks she can bring a gun to a lawsuit. Even you guys want her to shut up.
Poll: Americans Want Sarah Palin to Shut Up the Most | Mediaite
I am sure you have a loony right wing rag to quote differentlyQuote:
Notably, four out of every ten Republicans surveyed said that Palin should quiet down. (Two-thirds of Democrats and a “majority” of independents agreed with that sentiment.)
45% of respondents added that they wanted Jesse Jackson to be quiet, too; followed by Cheney (42%), Newt Gingrich (39%), Al Gore (37%), and Bill Clinton (31%).
Only 12% surveyed said that the politicians should keep talking.
Numbers don't lie, people.
Tal, all of them would have been HUGE improvements over any of the lunatics you actually have in offices... But then, look at the mess we have today... thanks to your people who actuallty ARE in office... you can't blame that on ANY of the ones the left likes to bash on... because they weren't responsible for ANY of it...
No... they are trying to exterminate the White race... not the Jews... same philosophy... only a different target group. Under teh Radar is they have been VERY effective at culling the Black race...with most Black pregnancies being terminated via abortions....and a near complete destruction of the Black family in only a few decades.Quote:
And they likely want to exterminate americans jews too, eh smoothy?
THe Liberals have been responsible for the deaths of far more blacks in the last decade alone...than the Nazi's were for the Deaths of every group combined in their final solution from its inception to its end.
They LOST! Thankfully. It would have been worse if they had won.
Ah, I see, thanks for the clarification smoothy.
I take it you're a strong proponent for "white power"?
It's that mindset that makes so many of us believe that places like California, Illinois (including Chicago) and every other place that voted for Obama... deserves the economy they are suffering through right now... because it they got EXACTLY what they voted for... unemployment, misery and poverty... and they deserve every bit of what has happened to them the last 6.5 years.Quote:
They LOST! Thankfully. It would have been worse if they had won.
I could have been a LOT better....but none of you wanted it to be any better.
Why did Rosa Parks need to sit in the front of the bus? Same question.Quote:
who needs a 30 round clip for a semi automatic rifle?
No, not at all.Quote:
Why did Rosa Parks need to sit in the front of the bus? Same question.
Rosa Parks didn't need a 30 clip semi automatic rifle to exercise her rights, why do you?
so you have disenfranchised a whole group of people with a wave of your dismissive hand, what you have shown is the thoughts your ilk have about other peopleQuote:
Those aren't Americans... those are Liberals that do that MOST of the time.
We have the Second Amendment that says we do... whether the lefties like it or not.
that isn't what you said you said lefties arn't americans
There is nothing about a right to 30 shot clips in the constitution. Limits can be set, and they have in the past.
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:49 PM. |