Ask Me Help Desk

Ask Me Help Desk (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forum.php)
-   Current Events (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forumdisplay.php?f=486)
-   -   Another nanny state ban? (https://www.askmehelpdesk.com/showthread.php?t=519183)

  • Jul 12, 2011, 04:33 AM
    tomder55

    Meanwhile Michelle sets another fine example .

    Michelle Obama orders 1,700-calorie meal at Shake Shack - 44 - The Washington Post

    Guess the example was the diet coke .
  • Jul 12, 2011, 04:54 AM
    NeedKarma
    What did Michelle eat for her other 1008 meals this year? Can you please give us the breakdown? Everything in moderation is my mantra.
  • Jul 12, 2011, 05:09 AM
    tomder55

    She should be the example ,the exception.
  • Jul 12, 2011, 05:16 AM
    NeedKarma
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by tomder55 View Post
    She should be the example ,the the exception.

    That's kind of the point I'm making, you're pointing out the exception.
  • Jul 12, 2011, 05:25 AM
    tomder55

    Nope... she has admitted her 'addiction' to French fries .
    The point is that she has made healthy eating and anti-obesity her signature moral crusade. Add onto this the attempt by various nanny states to outright ban the burgers and fries she regularly and publicly consumes ;it undermines her otherwise good message.
    Yesterday's presser was perfect for the Obama's
    "let them eat peas .....we'll eat grezzy burgers and fries "
  • Jul 12, 2011, 05:43 AM
    NeedKarma
    Ah I see. That's really important stuff there. Of course no one wants to outright ban burgers. Do you have a link for that?
  • Jul 12, 2011, 06:00 AM
    tomder55

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/us...food.html?_r=1

    Forest Green ban burgers and sausages (From Stroud News and Journal)

    Christine Quinn Weighs the Possibility of a Fast-Food Ban - New York Restaurants and Dining - Fork in the Road


    Also in North Carolina you can no longer order rare or medium rare burgers.
  • Jul 12, 2011, 06:11 AM
    NeedKarma
    The first link refers to the city council in East L.A.
    The second is a private stadium in England.
    The third is the same as the first: putting a max limit on the number of fast food outlets.

    a) No one is trying to ban hamburgers.
    b) None of it has anything to do with the Obamas.

    Do you read the stuff you link to?
  • Jul 12, 2011, 06:14 AM
    tomder55

    Do you have a reading problem ?

    Add onto this the attempt by various nanny states to outright ban the burgers and fries she regularily and publically consumes ;it undermines her otherwise good message.
  • Jul 12, 2011, 06:19 AM
    NeedKarma
    No one is trying to ban burgers. Do you have a reading problem?
    A stadium in England is not a state. LOL!

    Just stating it over and over does not make it true. It just makes you another conservative talking point repeater.
  • Jul 12, 2011, 06:20 AM
    tomder55

    The point is that whenever they go anywhere in public, they always seem to eat ice cream and junk food. So while she may be eating like a rabbit in the White House ,she sets a bad example in public ,especially with the public position she takes .
  • Jul 12, 2011, 06:30 AM
    speechlesstx

    They will never admit to her poor example, tom. There's some inexplicable blind spot when it comes to the Obamas with these people, even when it comes to the horrible mixed messages they're sending children.
  • Jul 12, 2011, 06:35 AM
    NeedKarma
    No blind spot, they talk about it here:
    Michelle Obama Shake Shack Burger Indulgence Defended by Nutritionists - ABC News

    Quote:

    But Katz of the Yale Prevention Center had advice for those who sought to make an example of the first lady's lunch.

    "I invite only those whose diets are housed with no walls of glass to hurl a burger in the first lady's direction on the basis of this one lunch," Katz said.
  • Jul 12, 2011, 06:50 AM
    speechlesstx

    Katz clearly missed her admitting she "can't stop" eating french fries. That's pretty clear unless in your Orwellian existence "can't stop" means "one lunch."
  • Jul 12, 2011, 06:55 AM
    NeedKarma
    Is she obese in your eyes?
  • Jul 12, 2011, 06:55 AM
    excon

    Hello again, Steve:

    I don't know why you're on her case soooo much... She's TYPICAL of most mothers in this country... She struggles between what she KNOWS is the best way to feed her family, and what the food industry is TELLING us is the best way to feed her family...

    I know you expect her to be supermom, but she's just a regular person... In fact, being a regular person is BETTER for the nation, rather than her playing a role that nobody believes...

    excon
  • Jul 12, 2011, 07:12 AM
    speechlesstx
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by NeedKarma View Post
    Is she obese in your eyes?

    That's irrelevant, one doesn't need to be obese to have dangerous cholesterol levels.
  • Jul 12, 2011, 07:15 AM
    speechlesstx
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by excon View Post
    I know you expect her to be supermom, but she's just a regular person... In fact, being a regular person is BETTER for the nation, rather than her playing a role that nobody believes..

    I'm 100 percent certain if this were a Bush you'd let them off the hook just as quickly, yes?
  • Jul 12, 2011, 07:20 AM
    tomder55
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by NeedKarma View Post
    Is she obese in your eyes?

    She doesn't look like she misses any meals .
  • Jul 12, 2011, 07:23 AM
    excon
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
    I'm 100 percent certain if this were a Bush you'd let them off the hook just as quickly, yes?

    Hello again, Steve:

    My disdain for George DOESN'T extend to his family... I LOVE Laura Bush.

    excon

  • All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:50 AM.